1. In May 1997, the Turkish army invaded the Kurdish Autonomous Region of Iraq. As a result of this act, a large number of people died, including civilians, thousands of people became refugees

1. In May 1997, the Turkish army invaded the Kurdish Autonomous Region of Iraq. As a result of this act, a large number of people died, including civilians, thousands of people became refugees. The reaction of the foreign ministries of several countries was as follows: "The government has received with concern the announcement of the start of a major operation of the Turkish army in northern Iraq. We cannot agree with actions that violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of another state - Iraq ..." The reaction of the Parliaments of these countries: "Our Parliament strongly condemns the actions of the Turkish army and calls on the Turkish leadership to immediately stop the repression against the Kurdish people and withdraw Turkish troops from the territory of sovereign Iraq."

2. By the law enforcement agencies of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the person V., accused of terrorism committed in the city of Tashkent, that is, of a crime under part 1 of Article 155 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, was put on the international wanted list. Soon he was discovered on the territory of the Russian Federation.
The Prosecutor General of the Republic of Uzbekistan appealed to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation with a request for the extradition of a citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the law enforcement agencies of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
The Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation decided to extradite V. to the law enforcement agencies of the Republic of Uzbekistan, and notified him in writing.
V. filed a complaint with the court against the decision of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, stating that he was not subject to extradition, since he had USSR citizenship, arrived to reside in the Russian Federation from a state that was part of the former USSR, registered at his place of residence in the Russian Federation, renounced the citizenship of the Republic of Uzbekistan and applied for admission to citizenship of the Russian Federation.
According to the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Republic of Uzbekistan, V. is a citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan, and has not applied for renunciation of citizenship. According to the Omsk Region Police Department, V. is indeed registered at his place of residence in the Russian Federation and has applied for the acquisition of citizenship of the Russian Federation.

3. B., a citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan, has been working as a labor migrant in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 5 years. 2021 On November 15, the Turkestan city criminal court of the South Kazakhstan region sentenced him to 6 years in prison for slandering a citizen of the Republic of Kazakhstan G.

Citizen B. informed his wife Z., who lives in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Citizen Z. applied to the prosecutor's office of the Pakhtakor district of the Jizzakh region with a statement on the continuation of the execution of the sentence to her husband in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The prosecutor's office of the Pakhtakor region rejected the citizen's application, stating that "everyone should be punished for their crimes and punished at the scene of the crime." Citizen Z. applied to the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan for legal assistance in organizing the continuation of her husband's sentence in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The International Legal Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan replied to the citizen that "such legal assistance is impossible, since we do not have an agreement with the Republic of Kazakhstan on the transfer of prisoners."

4. Ali Muhammad al-Abd-Rahman, born in 1949, is from Sudan. He was the head of the police system in Sudan's Darfur region from 2003 to 2004. During his military service, he inhumanly treated his subordinates and ordered the killing of those who did not follow his commands. In addition, during his leadership, police officers carried out such actions as violence against the population, intimidation, torture, and murder. The prosecutor of the International Court of Justice opened a criminal case against Ali Mohammed al Abd-Rahman and his subordinates on these actions. The prosecutor formed a commission of inquiry and issued a mandate to conduct an investigation and conducted an investigation in the Sudan.

5. During the post-flight inspection and customs control at the Tashkent International Airport, employees of the Internal Affairs and Customs Service seized 2.5 grams of heroin hidden in a camera case from a Pakistani Citizen P., who arrived on a U-Tair flight from Pakistan. Citizen P. In response, a citizen named P. stated that he was a member of the diplomatic mission and had diplomatic immunity, and that he used heroin for his own consumption. During the investigation, it turned out that he was not a representative of any diplomatic mission and did not have immunity, and also that his diplomatic passport was forged.

6. Ahmed al-Faki is a citizen of Mali. He was considered a very active member of the al-Qaeda movement. He was actively involved in the movement's activities in the Timbuktu region, and in June 2012 was involved in the destruction of more than 10 cultural sites and one religious institution in the Timbuktu region due to his religious animosity. Al-Faki, who was later arrested by the state, was found guilty of war crimes in the country and is due to appear before the International Criminal Court.

7. When an Italian citizen entered Uzbekistan through Pakistan, during a search at the airport, customs officers found a large consignment of drugs in his possession. The Pakistani government demanded the extradition of the perpetrator, as the drugs were smuggled out of Pakistan. The perpetrator also claimed that the drugs were supposed to be distributed in Italian territory and that the Italian government also requested his extradition, since the perpetrator was an Italian citizen.

8. In 2000, there was a military coup in State A. When the military came to power, they tried to take the lead because of the oil fields in the region. A military regime was established in the country, and the new government opposed foreign investment in the oil sector. The military seized all the property of oil companies with foreign investment on the orders of the commander in chief. The management of foreign companies was subjected to arrests and ill-treatment. Dissatisfied with the actions of State A, State B, which has many oil companies on its territory, withdrew all its companies and demanded that the international community cut off all economic and political ties with State A. As a member of the International Criminal Court, State B also applied to the International Criminal Court with a request on the prosecution of actions taken by the military government of State A on charges of war crimes, one of the international crimes specified in Article 5 of the Rome Statute. State A complained to the Security Council about State B's unlawful request and argued that State B was not a member of the International Criminal Court and that State B did not have jurisdiction over the International Criminal Court. State B was not a war crime, but the goal of preventing and combating crime in the country. According to State B, it was State A's government representatives who paid the large bribes in order to acquire more oil fields in State B's territory and not to interfere with the distribution of drugs in the country through the oil company.

9. A subsidiary of the international pharmaceutical corporation was convicted of paying bribes to representatives of the Ministry of Health of State A and heads of institutions providing medical services for the distribution of medicines produced by the Pharmaceutical Corporation.

The prosecution was able to prove only that the money transferred as bribes came from subsidiaries, but it was not possible to identify a single individual who committed acts of corruption.
As a result, the investigative body decided that the corporation should be investigated in connection with its subsidiary activities. Then the head of the regional investigation body appealed to the investigative body of the state in which the corporation is located, with a request to "provide practical assistance in investigating the activities of the corporation, depending on the situation." The investigative body of the country in which the corporation is located objected and replied that “the corporation is not responsible for the branch,” arguing that there is no mutual bilateral agreement on the provision of legal assistance. In response, the Government of State A accused the State in which the corporation is located of non-compliance with its international contractual obligations. Because both states are members of the UN Convention “Against corruption.” In accordance with the norms of the Convention, it is established that the member States of the Convention can jointly “provide mutual legal assistance" in the fight against corruption. That is, if there is no agreement regulating relations between the members of the agreement, the rules of the universal agreement apply.
The ministers accused of bribery used the right to refuse to testify, but were convicted. The following sanctions were applied to them: 1) Confiscation of instruments of crime that were used or planned to be used to commit a crime; 2) Confiscation of proceeds from crime; 3) Confiscation of property whose legal origin they could not prove. They objected to these sanctions, claiming that they contradict the principle of humanity.
National legislation on corruption and liability of legal entities fully coincides with the Council of Europe Convention on Criminal Liability for Corruption, its Protocol, the UN Convention against Corruption (2003).

10. Saidov M., citizen A, in 2000 committed a crime in A. In 2001 he acquired the citizenship of B. In 2002, A request was received from A for his extradition for criminal prosecution.

11. The Prosecutor General's Office of A has requested the extradition of Sharipov for criminal prosecution. It follows from the decision of the city court of State A that Sharipov was accused of committing war crimes. The acts of which Sharipov is accused are criminally punishable under the criminal law of both A and State B. The Criminal Code of State B provides for these crimes to be punished by imprisonment for a period of more than 10 years. The materials contain guarantees of the Prosecutor General's Office that Sharipov will be brought to criminal responsibility only for those crimes for which he was extradited.
Deputy Prosecutor General B issued a decree on the extradition of Sharipov to State A for criminal prosecution. After that, Sharipov filed a complaint with the court, citing the lack of grounds for his extradition, asked to cancel the court's ruling and the decision to extradite him to State A, pointing out that he is innocent of the acts for which he is being prosecuted.

12. The armed forces of State A. invaded the territory of State B. When bombing the objects of State B., the air bases of State B. were used. They were provided at the request of State A. State B. qualified the actions of State B. and A. as committing aggression and appealed to the UN Security Council with a request to apply sanctions to these states. State B. stated that raising the issue of sanctions against him was unlawful, since his armed forces did not participate in military operations against State B.

13. In 1999, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia sentenced Dusko Tadic to 20 years in prison for committing serious violations of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and crimes against humanity. In 2002, Dragan Kolyungia was sentenced to 3 years in prison for committing crimes against humanity and violating the laws and customs of war. In 2004, Moroslav Tadic and Simo Zaric were sentenced to 8 and 6 years in prison, respectively. In 2000, the Trial Chamber of the Tribunal sentenced Croatian General Tihomir Blaskic to 45 years in prison for crimes against humanity, violation of the laws and customs of war and serious violations of the Geneva Conventions of 1949. But in 2004, the appeals chamber overturned this sentence, commuting the sentence to 9 years in prison and releasing Blazhkich from prison.

14. The International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia has opened a criminal case against the current head of State. In connection with the events in Kosovo, former FRY President Slobodan Milosevic, against whom an international arrest warrant was issued, was accused of crimes against humanity, including organizing mass killings. The charges against Milosevic as commander-in-chief of the Yugoslav army were brought on the basis of the principle of "commander's responsibility" for crimes committed by his subordinates. Similar charges were brought against former Serbian President Milan Milutinovic, Deputy Prime Minister of the Federal Government Nikola Sainovic, Chief of the General Staff of the Yugoslav Army Dragoljub Oidanich and Serbian Interior Minister Vlajko Stojilkovic. The Chief Prosecutor of the Tribunal, Louise Arbour, had evidence of the involvement of all five leaders in the deportation of 740 thousand people and the murder of at least 340 Kosovo Albanians. However, the Albanian president counted on immunity from criminal prosecution.

15. On February 15, 2011, a series of peaceful protests began in Libya, which Gaddafi's security services tried to suppress. Within a week, the uprising had spread across the country, and Gaddafi was struggling to maintain control. Gaddafi responded with military force, including bombs aimed at civilians, and other measures such as censorship and blocking communications. The international community has taken a number of measures to stop Gaddafi.
UN Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011) forms the legal basis for military intervention in Libya, demanding an “immediate ceasefire” and authorizing the international community to establish a no-fly zone and use all necessary means, except foreign occupation, to protect civilians. A coalition of 17 States supports a no-fly zone and a naval blockade. The international coalition is also targeting ground units belonging to the Libyan Government in order to prevent attacks on civilians. During one of the missions, a Danish fighter jet bombs a military barracks. The barracks is part of the base from where attacks on the civilian population are carried out. Later it turns out that there were more than a hundred child soldiers in the barracks, who are now dead. The children were forcibly recruited by Gaddafi, who pumped them with alcohol and drugs to force them to fight.

16. Supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad carried out an armed attack on the US and French embassies in Damascus, as a result of which three employees of the French embassy were injured. The attack on the embassies followed the meeting of the American and French ambassadors with participants of anti-government demonstrations in the city of Hama on 16. At the US Embassy, the attackers smashed windows and CCTV cameras, installed a Syrian flag on its roof and painted the building with anti-American graffiti.

17. On August 19, 1990, a group of convicts disarmed a convoy and hijacked a TU-154 plane while escorting them to the place of serving their sentence. Threatening the passengers with violence, they forced the crew to change the route. Following the order of the terrorists, the crew flew to Tashkent, then to Karachi (Pakistan), where the terrorists surrendered to local authorities. In 1991, a Pakistani court sentenced them to 25 years in prison for hijacking an airplane.
The Republic of Uzbekistan protested, and the Government of Pakistan insisted on the extradition of prisoners to Uzbekistan.

18. An unknown virus has spread in State A. The symptoms of the virus are similar to those of the common cold and are transmitted from person to person through the air. State A did not disclose such information. By this step State A has committed a crime at the international level. Since there was no cure for the disease caused by the virus, citizens of State A illegally crossed the border with neighboring State B and left State A. As a result, the spread of an unknown virus in State B accelerated, and all areas of State B bordering State A were infected. In this case, State B accused State A of forcibly spreading the virus and, as a member of the International Criminal Court, asked the court to prosecute State A for crimes against humanity. Notably, State A is not a member of the International Criminal Court.

19. The liberation movement, whose base is located in a neighboring state, intends to overthrow the government of its own country and change its political system. To carry out its plans, it resorts to the services of mercenaries from different countries. The mercenaries are developing an operation to overthrow the government on the territory of a foreign state whose authorities are aware of their plans. An armed group manages to get on board a civilian aircraft departing for the country where the coup is to be carried out. When the plane lands at the airport, the police discover the weapon. The mercenaries forcibly seize another aircraft and force the pilot to deliver them to their designated destination.

20. On June 28, 1994, one of the field military commanders in Rwanda verbally ordered his subordinates not to take any illegal or inhuman actions against the local population. But drunken soldiers, a senior lieutenant and two ordinary soldiers sexually assaulted a woman and an underage girl and raped them. One of the soldiers also seriously injured the woman, leaving her paralyzed. Another ordinary soldier snatched valuables belonging to the victim.

One of the local elders complained to the commander about their actions. But the commander ignored the appeal.