116 References

Sana	27.01.2018
Hajmi	149.64 Kb.
	#25416

116

References

Adhikari, B. and J. C. Lovett, 2006, Transaction costs and community-based natural resource

656 management in Nepal, Journal of Environmental Management 78: 5-15.

Allen, D.W., 1991, ‘What are transaction costs?’ Research in Law and Economics 14: 1-18.

Alston, L.J., and K. Andersson, 2011, ‘Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by forest

protection: The transaction costs of implementing REDD’, Climate Law 2: 281-289.

Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Sims KRE, Healy A, Holland MB, 2010. Protected areas reduced

poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9996–10001.

Antinori, C. and J. Sathaye, 2007, ‘Assessing transaction costs of project-based greenhouse

gas emissions trading’, Report: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National

Laboratory.

Asia Regional Biodiversity Conservation Program (ARBCP), 2010. Socio-economic survey

for assessing the Vietnam government pilot policy on payment for environmental

services for Lam Dong province. Working paper. (ARBCP. Ho Chi Minh City).

Asquith, N.M., Vargas, M. T., Wunder, S., 2008. Selling two environmental services: in-kind

payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological

Economics 65, 676–685.

Atmadja S, Verchot L, 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in

addressing leakage from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest

degradation (REDD+). Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change, 17: 311-336.

Bellassen, V., Gitz, V., 2008. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in

Cameroon - Assessing costs and benefits. Ecological Economics 68: 336-344.

Bellù LG, Liberati P, 2006. Inequality Analysis The Gini Index, prepared for the Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, Rome).

Benecke, G., L. Friberg, M. Lederer, and M. Schröder, 2008. ‘From public-private partnership

to market. the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as a new form of governance

in climate protection’, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 10, Research

Center (SFB) 700, Berlin.

Bennett K., 2010. Additionality: the next step for ecosystem service markets. Duke Environ

Law Pol Forum 20: 417–38.

Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den, K.J. Button, P. Nijkamp, and G.C. Pepping, 1997. Meta-Analysis in

Environmental Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

117

Blaser, J., Robledo, C., 2007. Initial analysis on the mitigation potential in the forestry sector.

Prepared

for

the

UNFCCC

Secretariat,

https://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/application

/pdf/blaser.pdf (accessed 10.04.2012)

Boer, R., 2001. Economic Assessment of Mitigation Options for Enhancing and Maintaining

Carbon Sink Capacity in Indonesia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global

Change 6: 257-290.

Boerner CS, Macher JT, 2002. Transaction cost economics: an assessment of empirical

research in the social sciences. Walter A. Haas School of Business working paper:

Berkeley, CA.

Börner, J., Wunder, S., 2008. Paying for Avoided Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon:

from Cost Assessment to Scheme Design. International Forestry Review 10: 496-511.

Boucher, D., 2008. Out of the Woods: A Realistic Role for Tropical Forests in Curbing Global

Warming. Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), UCS Publications, Cambridge MA,

http://www.eanth.org/Policy/UCS-REDD-Boucherreport.pdf

(accessed

10.04.2012)

Bouma, J., Bulte, E. and van Soest, D., 2008. Trust and cooperation: Social capital and

community resource management. Journal of Environmental Economics and

Management, 56: 155-166.

Brander, L.M., Florax, R.J.G.M., Vermaat, J.E., 2006. The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A

Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Environmental and

Resource Economics 33: 223-250.

Brouwer, R., I. H. Langford, I. J. Bateman, T. C. Crowards and R. K. Turner, 1999. A Meta-

Analysis of Wetland Contingent Valuation Studies. Regional Environmental Change

1: 47-57.

Brouwer, R., A. Tesfaye, P. Pauw, 2011. Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors

explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services.

Environmental Conservation 38: 380–392.

Brown, D., Seymour, F., Peskett, L., 2008. Chapter 11 How do we achieve REDD co-benefits

and avoid doing harm? In Angelsen, A. (Ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues,

Options and Implications. CIFOR Bogor, Indonesia.

Bryant D, Nielsen D, Tangley L, 1997. The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies

on the Edge (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC).

Buitelaar, E, 2008. Institutions and Transaction costs. The Cost of Land Use Decisions,

Blackwell Publishing Ltd: i-viii.

Bumpus A.G. and D. M. Liverman, 2008, ‘Accumulation by decarbonisation and the

governance of carbon offsets’, Economic Geography 84: 127-156.

118

Busch J et al., 2012 Structuring economic incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation

within Indonesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 1062–1067.

Butler RA, Laurance WF, 2008. New strategies for conserving tropical forests. Trends Ecol

Evol 23: 469-472.

Butler, R. A., Koh, L. P., Ghazoul, J., 2009. REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine

carbon payment schemes. Conservation Letters 2: 67-73.

Cacho, O. J., L. Lipper and J. Moss, 2013, ‘Transaction costs of carbon offset projects: A

comparative study’, Ecological Economics 88: 232-243.

Chadwick, B. P., 2006, ‘Transaction costs and the clean development mechanism’, Natural

Resources Forum 30: 256–271.

Challen, R., 2000, Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Environmental Policy. Institutional

reform for water resources, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Check, JW, Schutt, RK, 2012. Chapter 8: Survey research. Research methods in Education.

Sage Publications, pp 440.

Chen X, Lupi F, He G, Liu J, 2009. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment

in payments for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:11812–11817.

Chomitz, K. M., Kumari, K., 1998. The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: A Critical

Review. The World Bank Research Observer 13: 13-35.

Claassen, R., Cattaneo, R., Johansson, R., 2008. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental

payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics 65,

738–753.

Corbera E, Soberanis González C, Brown K, 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for

ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry program. Ecological

Economics 68: 743–761.

Coggan, A., S. M. Whitten and J. Bennett, 2010, ‘Influences of transaction costs in

environmental policy’, Ecological Economics 69: 1777-1784.

Coggan, A., E. Buitelaar, S. Whitten and J. Bennett, 2013, ‘Factors that influence transaction

costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? Ecological Economics 88:

222-231.

Commune People’s Committee of Lam Dong Province (Lam Dong CPC), 2014, Evaluating

report on the 3 year implementation of Payment for Environmental Services in Lam

Dong Province from 2010 to 2013 (Lam Dong).

Coomes, O., Grimardb, F., Potvinc, C., Simad, P., 2008. The fate of the tropical forest:

Carbon or cattle? Ecological Economics 65: 207-212.

119

Corbera E, Soberanis González C, Brown K, 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for

ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry program. Ecol Econ 68:

743–761.

Coria, J and J. Jaraitė, 2015 ‘Carbon Pricing: Transaction Costs of Emissions Trading vs.

Carbon Taxes’, Paper presented at the Annual European Association of

Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) conference in Helsinki, 24-27

June 2015.

Curtis PS and Wang X, 1998. A meta-analysis of elevated CO

effects on woody plant mass,

form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299–313.

Dahlman, C. J., 1979, ‘Problem of externality’, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 141–162.

Daniels AE, Bagstad K, Esposito V, Moulaert A, Rodriguez CM, 2010. Understanding the

impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: are we asking the right questions? Ecol Econ 69: 2116–

2126.

De Alessi, L., 1983, ‘Property rights and transaction costs: a new perspective in economic

theory’, The Social Science Journal 20: 59 – 69.

Diaz, M . D. C., Schwartzman, S., 2005. Carbon offsets and land use in the Brazilian Amazon.

In Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S. (Eds.), Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change.

IPAM: Belem, Brazil and Environmental Defense: Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.

Dixon PM, Weiner J, Mitchell-Olds T, Woodley R, 1987. Bootstrapping the Gini Coefficient

of Inequality. Ecology 68: 1548-1551.

Douglas, W. A and D. Lueck, 1993. ‘Transaction Costs and the Design of Crop share

Contracts’, The RAND Journal of Economics 24: 78-100.

Dran Forest Management Board (Dran FMB) 2014. Evaluating report on the 3 year

implementation of Payment for Environmental Services in Don Duong District from

2010 to 2013 (Lam Dong).

Ebeling, J., Yasué, M., 2008. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and

its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, 1917-

1924.

Eliasch, J., 2008. Part I: The challenge of deforestation. Climate change: financing global

forests. The Eliasch Review. Earthscan, London.

Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in

theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, 663–675.

Falconer, K., M. Whitby, 1999, ‘Transactions and administrative costs in countryside

stewardship policies: An investigation for eight European member states’, Research

Report. University of Newcastle, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development.

120

FAO, 2003. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 - An FAO perspective. In Bruinsma, J.

(Ed.). Rome, FAO and London, Earthscan.

FAO, 2005. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. FAO, Rome.

FAO, 2007. The State of Food and Agriculture. Part I: Paying farmers for environmental

services. FAO, Rome.

FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. FAO, Rome.

FAO, 2010. State of the world’s forests 2011. FAO, Rome.

Farley, J., Costanza, R., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global.

Ecological Economics 69 2060–2068.

Fearnside, P. M, 2005. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, rates, and

consequences. Conservation Biology 19: 680–688.

Fisher, B., Edwards, D. P., Giam, X., Wilcove, D. S., 2011. The high costs of conserving

Southeast Asia's lowland rainforests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:

329-334.

Fitzherbert, E.B., Struebig, M.J., Morel, A., Danielson, F., Bruhl, C.A., Donald, P.F. et al.,

2008. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution

23: 538–545.

Frost, P.G.H., Bond, I., 2008. The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for

wildlife services. Ecological Economics 65, 777–788.

Fullerton, D., 2001, ‘A framework to compare environmental policies’, Working Paper, vol.

8420. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Garrick, D., L. McCann and D. J. Pannell, 2013, ‘Transaction costs and environmental policy:

Taking stock, looking forward’, Ecological Economics 88: 182-184.

Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical

deforestation. BioScience 52: 143–50.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., Smith, M. L., 1981. Meta-analysis in social research. Sage

Publications, Beverly Hills.

Grieg-Gran M, Porras I, Wunder S, 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest

environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World

Dev 33: 1511–1527.

Grieg-Gran, M. and C. Bann, 2003, ‘A closer look at payments and markets for

environmental services’, in Gutman, P. (ed.): From goodwill to payments of

environmental services, a survey of financing options for sustainable natural resource

management in developing countries, WWF MPO.

121

Grieg-Gran, M., 2009. The Cost of Avoided Deforestation as a Climate Change Mitigation

Option. In Palmer, C., Engel, S. (Eds.), Avoided Deforestation. Prospects for

Mitigating Climate Change. Routledge Explorations in Environmental Economics

Series. pp. 11-38.

Guo S, Fraser MW, 2009. Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications

(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

Hansen MC et al., 2003, Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters:

First results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm (Earth Interact).

Heckman J, Vytlacil E, 1999. Local instrumental variable and latent variable models for

identifying and bounding treatment effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 4730–4734.

Hope, C., Castilla-Rubio, J. C., 2008. A first cost benefit analysis of action to reduce

deforestation. Judge Business School, University of Cambridge. New work

commissioned for the Eliasch Review.

Hosonuma N, Herold M, De Sy V, De Fries RS, Brockhaus M, Verchot LV, Angelsen A,

Romijn JE (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in

developing countries. Environmental Research Letters 7: 1-12.

Houghton, R. A., 2005. Tropical deforestation as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. In

Mountinho, P., Schwartzman, S. (Eds.), Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change.

IPAM: Belem, Brazil and Environmental Defense: Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.

Huang C et al., 2009. Dynamics of National Forests Assessed Using the Landsat Record:

Case Studies in Eastern United States. Remote Sense Environ 113: 1430-1442.

Ingram, J. C., and D. Wilkie, 2008, ‘Governance of the global carbon market: does scale

matter?’ in K. Redford, and C. Grippo (eds.), WCS Working Paper 36: Protected

Areas, Governance and Scale.

IPCC, 2000 - Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J.,

Dokken, D. J. (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 375.

Irawan, S., Tacconi, L., Ring, I., 2011. Stakeholders’ incentives for land-use change and

REDD+: the case of Indonesia. Working Paper #2, Asia Pacific Network for

Environmental Governance, The Australian National University.

Jack BK, Kousky C, Sims KRE. 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons

from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. ProcNatlAcadSci USA

105:9465–9470

Jindal R, Kerr JM, Carter S, 2012. Reducing Poverty Through Carbon Forestry? Impacts of

the N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Dev 40: 2123–

2135.

122

Jindal, R., B. Swallow, and J. Kerr, 2008, ‘Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in

Africa: Potential benefits and challenges’, Natural Resources Forum 32: 116-130.

Kindermann, G. E., Obersteiner, M., Rametsteiner, E., McCallum, I., 2006. Predicting the

deforestation trend under different carbon prices. Carbon Balance Management 1, 1–

15.

Kindermann, G. E., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner,

E., Schlamadinger, B., Wunder, S., Beach, R., 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing

carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 105,10302–

10307.

Kosoy N, Martinez-Tuna M, Muradian R, Martinez-Alier J 2007 Payments for environmental

services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central

America. Ecol Eco 61: 446–455.

Kossoy, A. and Ambrosi, P. 2010 State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010. Carbon

Finance. World Bank. Washington DC.

Kremen, C., Niles, J. O., Dalton, M. G., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Fay, J. P., Grewal, D.,

Guillery, R. P., 2000. Economic Incentives for Rain Forest Conservation Across

Scales. Science 288: 1828-1832.

Krey, M. 2005, ‘Transaction costs of unilateral CDM Projects in India - results from an

empirical survey’, Energy Policy 33: 2385-2397.

Kronenberg, J., and K. Hubacek. 2013. Could payments for ecosystem services create an

"ecosystem service curse"? Ecology and Society 18: 10.

Krutilla, K, Krause, R, 2011 Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment

framework and literature review. International Review of Environmental and

Resource Economics 4, 262–354.

Kumar, R, 2005. Chapter 9: Selecting a method of data collection. Research methodology –

A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications, pp331.

Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist H, Agbola S, Angelsen A, et al (2001) The causes of land-use

and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11:

261–69.

Lam Dong Forest Development and Protection Fund (Lam Dong FPDF) 2014 Annual report

on Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Lam Dong (Lam Dong)

Landell-Mills, N and Porras, TI 2002 Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets

for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. Instruments for

sustainable private sector forestry series. International Institute for Environment and

Development, London.

123

Lasco, R. D., Pulhin, F. B., 2001. Climate Change Mitigation Activities in the Philippine

Forestry Sector: Application of the COMAP Model. Mitigation and Adaptation

Strategies for Global Change 6: 313-334.

Lederer, M. 2011, ‘From CDM to REDD+ -What do we know for setting up effective and

legitimate carbon governance?’, Ecological Economics 70: 1900-1907.

Li J, Feldman M, Li S, Daily GC 2011 Rural household income and inequality under payment

for ecosystem services: The Sloping Land Conversion Program in Western China.

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 7721–7726.

Liu J, Yang W 2013 Integrated Assessments of Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs.

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 16297–16298.

Locatelli B, Rojas V, Salinas Z 2008 Impacts of payments for environmental services on local

development in northern Costa Rica: a fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Forest Policy

Econ 10: 275–285.

Loomis, JB and White DS (1996) Economic benefits of rare and endangered species:

summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18: 197–206.

Lubowski, R. N., 2008. Chapter 3 What are the costs and potentials of REDD? In Angelsen,

A. (Ed.) Moving Ahead with REDD Issues, Options and Implications. CIFOR Bogor,

Indonesia.

Luttrell, C., K. Schreckenberg, and L. Peskett 2007, ‘The implications of carbon financing

for pro-poor community forestry’, Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Forestry

Briefing 14. London: ODI.

Makundi, W. R., Okiting'ati, A., 1995. Carbon flows and economic evaluation of mitigation

options in Tanzania's forest sector. Biomass and Bioenergy 8: 381-393.

Mann, C., 1990. Meta-analysis in the breach. Science 249: 476–480.

Matthews, R.C.O 1986, ‘The economics of institutions and the sources of growth’, The

Economic Journal 96: 903–918.

Mburu, J., Birner, R., Zeller, M., 2003. Relative importance and determinants of landowners

transaction costs in collaborative wildlife management in Kenya: an empirical

analysis. Ecological Economics 45, 59–73.

McCann, L. 2013, ‘Transaction costs and environmental policy design’, Ecological

Economics 88: 253-262.

McCann, L., Colby, B., Easter, K.W., Kasterine, A., Kuperan, K.V., 2005. Transaction cost

measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecological Economics 52: 527-

542.

McElwee, P., 2012. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest

conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem? Geoforum 43 (3).

124

McElwee, P.D., T. Nghiem, H. Le, H. Vu, and N. Tran. 2014. “Payments for Environmental

Services and Contested Neoliberalisation in Developing Countries: A Case Study

from Vietnam.” Journal of Rural Studies.

Meshack, C. K., B. AhdikarI, N. Doggart, and J. C. Lovett 2006, ‘Transaction costs of

community-based forest management: empirical evidence from Tanzania’, African

Journal of Ecology 44: 468-477.

Mettepenningen, E., A. Verspecht, and G. van Huylenbroeck 2009, ‘Measuring private

transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes’, Journal of Environmental

Planning and Management 52: 649-667.

Mettepenningen, E., and G. van Huylenbroeck 2009, ‘Factors influencing private transaction

costs related to Agri-environmental Schemes in Europe’, in F. Bruwer, M. van der

Heide (eds.), Multifunctional Rural Land Management: Economics and Policies, pp.

145-168.

Milder JC, Scherr SJ, Bracer C 2010 Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem

services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecol Soc 15 (Art. No. 4).

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis

(Island Press, Washington, DC).

Milne, M. 1999, ‘Transaction costs of forest carbon projects’, Centre for International

Forestry Research (CIFOR) Bogor, Indonesia.

Mundaca, L., M. Mansoz, L. Neij, and G. R. Timilsina 2013, ‘Transaction costs of low-carbon

technologies and policies: The diverging literature’, Policy Research Working Paper

Series, No.6565, World Bank.

Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H. 2010 Reconciling theory and

practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for

ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 69: 1202–1208.

Muradian, R. and Rival, L. M., 2012. Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services. New

York: Springer.

Murphy, J.J., P.G. Allen, T.H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead, 2005. A meta-analysis of

hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Environmental and Resource

Economics 30: 313-25.

Murray, B.C., 2008. Leakage from an avoided deforestation compensation policy: Concepts,

empirical evidence, and corrective policy options. Nicholas Institute for

Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, NC. 32p.

Nabuurs, G.J. et al. 2007, ‘Chapter 9: Forestry’, in B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R.

Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working

Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on

125

Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New

York, NY, USA.

Naeem S et al 2015 Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science 347:

1206-1207.

Naidoo R et al. 2008 Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc

Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9495–9500.

Nelson, J., Kennedy, P., 2009. The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and

Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment. Environmental and Resource

Economics 42, 345-377.

Nepstad, D., Merry, F., Rodrigues, H. O., Schwartzman, S., Almeida, O. 2007. The Costs

and Beneﬁts of Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation and Forest

Degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA.

Nepstad, D., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F., Lima, A., Moutinho, P., Carter, J., Bowman, M.,

Cattaneo, A., Rodrigues, H., Schwartzman, S., McGrath, D. G.,. Stickler, C. M.,

Lubowski, R., Piris-Cabezas, P., Rivero, S., Alencar, A., Almeida, O., Stella, O., 2009.

The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 326: 1350-1351.

Nguyen TYL 2013 Evaluating the pilot implementation of Payment for Forest

Environmental Services in Lam Dong, Vietnam. Working paper (Economy and

Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), Philippines.

Nguyen, QT, 2008. The household economy and decentralization of forest management in

Vietnam. In: Colfer, C.J.P., Dahal, G.R., Capistrano, D. (Eds.), Lessons from Forest

Decentralization: Money, Justice and the Quest for Good Governance in Asia-Pacific.

Earthscan/CIFOR, London, pp. 187–209.

Nguyen, QT, 2011. Payment for environmental Services in Vietnam: An Analysis of the Pilot

Project in Lam Dong Province. Forest Conservation Project. Occasional Paper No. 5

(Institute for Global Environmental Strategies).

North, D.C., 1990, ‘Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance’,

Cambridge University Press.

Osafo, Y. B., 2005. Reducing emissions from tropical forest deforestation: applying

compensated reduction in Ghana. In Moutinho, P. and Schwartzman, S. (Eds.),

Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change. IPAM: Belem, Brazil and Environmental

Defense: Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.

Osborne, T., C. Kiker, 2005. Carbon offsets as an economic alternative to large-scale logging:

a case study in Guyana. Ecological Economics 52: 481-496.

Pagiola S, Arcenas A, Platais G, 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce

poverty? An exploration of the issues and evidence to date from Latin America. World

Dev 33: 237–253.

126

Pagiola, S., 2002. Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica. In:

Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., Landell-Mills, N. (Eds.), Selling Forest Environmental Services:

Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation. Earthscan, London, pp. 37–61.

Pagiola, S., Ramírez, E., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., Ruíz, J.P., 2007.

Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Special

Issue on Ecosystem Services and Agriculture, Ecological Economics 64: 374–385.

Palm, M., M. Ostwald, G. Berndes, and N. H. Ravindranath, 2009, ‘Application of Clean

Development Mechanism to forest plantation projects and rural development in

India’, Applied Geography 29: 2-11.

Pascual, U., et al., 2010. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for

environmental services: A conceptual approach. Ecological Economics 69: 1237–1244

Pattayanka SK, Wunder S, Ferraro PJ, 2010. Show me the money: do payments supply

environmental services in developing countries? Rev Environ Econ Policy 4: 254–274.

Pham TT, Moeliono M, Nguyen TH, Nguyen HT, Vu TH, 2012. The Context of REDD+ in

Vietnam: Drivers, Agents, and Institutions. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International

Forestry Research.

Pham, TT, Bennet K, Vu TP, Brunner J, Le ND, Nguyen DT, 2013. Payments for forest

environmental services in Vietnam: From policy to practice. Occasional Paper 93

(CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia).

Pham, TT, Campbell BM, Garnett S., Aslin H., Hoang, MH, 2010. Importance and impacts

of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental

services in Vietnam. Environmental Conservation 37: 64–72.

Potvin, C., Guay, B., Pedroni, L., 2008. Is reducing emissions from deforestation financially

feasible? A Panamanian case study. Climate Policy 8: 23-40.

Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover:

Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem Cycles 13:997–1027.

Ravindranath, N. H., Sudha, P., Rao, S., 2001. Forestry for sustainable biomass production

and carbon sequesteration in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global

Change 6: 233-256.

Ray, B., and R. N. Bhattacharya, 2011, ‘Transaction costs, collective action, and survival of

heterogeneous co-management institutions: case study of forest management

organizations in West Bengal, India’, Journal of Development Studies 47: 253-273.

Richards, K. R., Stokes, C., 2004. A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A

Dozen Years of Research. Climatic Change 63: 1-48.

Rindfleisch, A. and J. B. Heide, 1997, ‘Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future

applications’, Journal of Marketing 61: 30-54.

127

Ring I, Barton DN, 2015. Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity

conservation and ecosystem governance. In: Martinez-Alier J, Muradian R. (Eds.):

Handbook of Ecological Economics. Edward Elgar.

Robalino J et al., 2007 Deforestation Impacts of Environmental Services Payments: Costa

Rica’s PSA Program 2000–2005. Resource for the Future and EfD Working Paper

Series DP24 (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future).

Roe D., 2008 The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: are view of key

literature, events and policy processes. Oryx 42: 491–503.

Rørstad, P. K., A. Vatn, and V. Kvakkestad, 2007, ‘Why do transaction costs of agricultural

policies vary?’, Agricultural Economics 36: 1-11.

Ruslandi, Venter, O., Putz, F. E., 2011. Overestimating conservation costs in Southeast Asia.

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 542-544.

Sánchez-Azofeifa A, Pfaff A, Robalino JA, Boomhawer J, 2007 Costa Rica’s payment for

environmental services program: Intention, implementation, and impact. Conserv

Biol 21:1165–1173.

Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Chan., P., 2011. Emissions scenarios, costs, and implementation

considerations of REDD-plus programs. Environment and Development Economics

16(Special Issue 04), 361-380.

Sayer J. et al., 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture,

conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 8349–

8356.

Schomers S, Matzdorf B, 2013. Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison

of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosyst Serv 6:122–132.

Sedjo, R. A., Wisniewski, J., Sample, A. V., and Kinsman, J. D., 1995. The economics of

managing carbon via forestry: Assessment of existing studies. Environmental and

Resource Economics 6: 139-165.

Shackleton, C.M., 1996. Potential stimulation of local rural economies by harvesting

secondary products: a case study of the central eastern Transvaal lowveld, Ambio 25,

pp. 33–38.

Shackleton, C.M., Shackleton, S.E., Buiten, E., Bird, N, 2007. The importance of dry

woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa.

Forest Policy and Economics 9: 558–577.

Sierra R, Russman E, 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest

conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecol Econ 59:131–41.

Sikor, T.: 1995, ‘Decree 327 and the restoration of barren land in the Vietnamese highlands’,

in A.T. Rambo, R.R. Reed, Le TrongCuc and M.R. Di Gregorio (eds.), The Challenges

128

of Highland Development in Vietnam, East-West Center, Hawai; Center for Natural

Resources and Environmental Studies, Hanoi University; Center for Southeast Asia

Studies, University of California, pp. 143–156.

Silberston, A., 1972. Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice. The Economic Journal 82:

369-391.

Silva-Chávez, G. A., 2005. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from tropical deforestation

by applying compensated reduction to Bolivia. In Moutinho, P. and Schwartzman, S.

(Eds.), Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change. IPAM: Belem, Brazil and

Environmental Defense: Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.

Simon, H.A., 1947, Administrative behavior, New York, NY: Macmillan.

Slangen, L. H. G., L. A. Loucks, and A. H. L. Slangen 2008, ‘Institutional economics and

economic organization theory’, Wageningen Academic Publishers.

Smith, V.K., Kaoru, Y., 1990. Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit

estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 419–433.

Soares-Filho, B.S. et al., 2009. Role Of Brazilian Amazon Protected Areas In Climate Change

Mitigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 10821-10826.

Sodhi, N.S. et al., 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends in

Ecology & Evolution 19: 654–660.

Sohngen, B., 2009. An analysis of forestry carbon sequestration as a response to climate

change. Copenhagen Consensus on Climate.

Sohngen, B., Beach, R. H., Andrasko, K., 2008. Avoided Deforestation as a Greenhouse Gas

Mitigation Tool: Economic Issues. Journal of Environmental Quality. 37: 1368-1375.

Sommerville M, Milner-Gulland EJ, Rahajaharison M, Jones JPG, 2010. Impact of

community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in

Menabe, Madagascar. Conserv Biol 24: 1488–1498.

Stanley, T.D., 2001. Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review.

Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 131-150.

Stern, N., 2006. Part VI: International Collective Action. The Economics of Climate Change:

The Stern Review Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Stickler, C., Nepstad, D., Coe, M., Macgrath, D., Rodrigues, H., Davidson, E., Soares-Filho,

B., 2009. The potential ecological costs and co-benefits of REDD: A critical review

and case study from the Amazon region. Global Change Biology 15, 2803–2824.

Strassburg, B., Turner, R. K., Fisher, B., Schaeffer, R., Lovett, A., 2009. Reducing emissions

from deforestation - The combined incentives mechanism and empirical simulations.

Global Environmental Change 19: 265-278.

129

Strassburg, B.B.N., Rodrigues A.S.L., Gusti, M., Balmford, A., Fritz, S., Obersteiner, M.,

Turner, R.K., Brooks T.M., 2012. Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from

deforestation on global species extinctions. Nature Climate Change 2, 350–355.

Suhardiman, Diana, Dennis Wichelns, Guillaume Lestrelin, and Chu Thai Hoanh. 2013.

“Payments for Ecosystem Services in Vietnam: Market-Based Incentives or State

Control of Resources?” Ecosystem Services, 6: 64–71.

Tacconi, L., 2012. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics,

73 (15): 29-36.

Taylor, M., and S. Singleton, 1993, ‘The communal resource: transaction costs and the

solution of collective action problems’, Politics and Society 21: 195-214.

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), 2010. Mainstreaming the economics

of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.

Thomas, S., P. Dargusch, S. Harrison, and J. Herbohn, 2010, ‘Why are there so few

afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects?’, Land Use

Policy 27: 880-887.

Thompson, O. R. R., J. Paavola, J. R. Healey, J. P. G. Jones, T. R. Baker, and J. Torres, 2013,

‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+):

Transaction costs of six Peruvian projects’, Ecology and Society 18: 17-29.

To, PX 2007 Forest property in the Vietnamese uplands: An ethnography of forest relations

in Three Dao Villages. Berlin and London: LIT Verlage/Transaction Publishers; 2007.

To, PX et al. 2012 The prospects for payment for ecosystem services in Vietnam: a look at

three payment schemes. Human Ecology 40: 237–249.

Tomich, T. P., de Foresta, H., Dennis, R., Ketterings, Q., Murdiyarso, D., Palm, C., Stolle,

F., Suyanto, van Noordwijk, M., 2002. Carbon offsets for conservation and

development in Indonesia? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17: 125-137.

Townshend JRG, Carroll M, Dimiceli C, Sohlberg R, Hansen M, DeFries R 2011. User Guide

for the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Field. Collection 5 Version 1 (University of

Maryland, College Park, Maryland).

Turpie, J.K., Marais, C., Blignaut, J.N., 2008. The Working for Water Programme: evolution

of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and

ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics 65, 789–799

van Kooten, G. C., Eagle, A. J., Manley, J., Smolak, T., 2004. How costly are carbon offsets?

A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks. Environmental Science & Policy 7: 239-251.

van Kooten, G. C., Laaksonen-Craig, S., Wang, Y., 2009. A meta-regression analysis of forest

carbon offset costs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 2153-2167.

130

Vatn A 2010 An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ

69: 1245–1252.

Vatn, A. 2005, Institutions and the environment. Institutional economics: different

positions. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Venter, O., Meijaard, E., Possingham, H., Dennis, R., Sheil, D., Wich, S., Hovani, L., Wilson,

K., 2009. Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals.

Conservation Letters 2:, 123-129.

Wang, N. 2007, ‘Measuring transaction costs: diverging approaches, contending practices’,

Division of Labour and Transaction Costs 2: 111–146.

Wangwacharakul, V., Bowonwiwat , R., 1995. Economic evaluation of CO

response options

in the forestry sector: The case of Thailand. Biomass and Bioenergy 8: 293-307.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. 2006, ‘Payments for environmental services – A solution for

biodiversity conservation?’, Working paper N° 12/2006, RessourcesNaturelles.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff¬, S., 2008. Estimating the costs of reducing forest emissions A review

of methods. Working paper No.42. CIFOR Bogor, Indonesia.

Williamson, O. E. 1985, ‘The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational

contracting’, Free Press, New York.

Williamson, O. E. 2000, ‘The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead’,

Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595-613.

Williamson, O.E. 1979, ‘Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual

relations’, Journal of Economic Issues 22: 233-261.

Williamson, O.E. 1996, ‘The mechanisms of governance’, Oxford University Press, New

York.

Williamson, O.E. 1998, ‘Transaction cost economics: how it works: where it is headed’, De

Economist 146: 23–58.

Winrock International (2011) Payment for Forest Environmental Services: A Case Study on

Pilot Implementation in Lam Dong Province Vietnam from 2006 - 2010.

Woerdman, E. 2004, ‘Chapter 5: Transaction costs of market based climate policy’, The

Institutional Economics of Market- Based Climate Policy. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp.

326.

Wolf, F.M. ,1986. Meta-analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

Woodward RT, Wui YS, 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis.

Ecological Economics 37: 257–70.

World Bank, 2011. Estimating the Opportunity Costs of REDD+ A training manual

131

Wunder S, 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. Occasional

Paper No. 42 (CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia).

Wunder, S, 2008. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and

preliminary evidence. Environ Dev Econ 13: 279-297.

Wunder, S., 2008. How do we deal with leakage? In: Angelsen, A. (Ed.), Moving Ahead with

REDD. CIFOR, Bogor, pp. 65–76.

Wunder, S., and M. Alban. 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The

cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 65: 685-698.

Wunder, S., S. Engel, S., S.Pagiola, S. 2008 Taking stock: lessons learnt for the design of

payments for environmental services programs. Ecological Economics 65, 834–852.

Yamamoto, Y., Takeuchi, K., 2012. Estimating the break-even price for forest protection in

Central Kalimantan. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 14, 289–301.

Zandersen M and Tol RSJ, 2009. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe.

Journal of Forest Economics 15: 109–130.

Zheng H et al., 2013. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for

ecosystem service program. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 110:16681–16686.

138

Acknowledgements

And so the long journey has finally reached its destination, marking itself one of the most

unforgettable chapters in my life, filled with lots of emotions, (un-)expectations, and the

inevitably frustrations. It is the journey I enjoy very much, the one where I saw my normal

self growing, transforming, getting lost and finding the way back at the same time. One

thing I know for sure, that I could have not finished my PhD without the incredible supports

from many people, some of them I would like to thank in particular.

First and foremost, my promotor Roy Brouwer and co-promotor Marc Davidson, I

am very grateful for having you as both my scientific and mental supervisors. Working with

you has given me the opportunities to learn new things with an open-minded attitude. I

used to be a risk-averse person who is afraid of stepping out of her comfort zone. And you

two have shown me that it is always worthy to try, to gain and to fail. After all, it takes only

one’s courage to become an inspirational explorer.

Roy, I enjoy all the discussions we had and I deeply appreciate how you always encouraged

me to think bigger and be more critical. The way you approach your students gives them

motivations and confidence to carry on their “immature and oftentimes overambitious”

research ideas. It was your calmness and trust that pulled me back every time I found myself

totally lost and hopeless. Since I became a (non-experienced) mom, you never minded

listening to my personal parenting life. Still I remember you told me “this is a new exciting

phase in your life, and it is completely normal that you talk about this”. That means a lot to

me, Roy!

To my co-promotor, Marc. Thank you so much for solely giving me the freedom to develop

my own research, and so importantly, for your generous financial support that enabled me

to go to conferences as well as the fieldtrip in Vietnam. You are the one that helps me realize

how important it is to pursue your dream with true passion, determination, and rationality.

Together with Roy, you made my PhD journey more memorable with your kind,

enthusiastic, and optimistic personality! It was always fun and gezellig to talk about our

daily life and the cooking recipes we shared over lunch time.

In addition to my supervisors, this PhD research also received substantial supports

from the FPDFs’ people in Lam Dong and Son La, especially the two directors: chú Thọ Võ

and anh Thắng Phạm. Their helps greatly support the accomplishment of my fieldtrips in

139

Lam Dong and Son La. I had a great time working with the Fund’s staff, especially anh Quang

and em Thảo. During the two continuous weeks of surveys, valuable lessons had been shared

between us. Topics range from how to gain trust from the interviewees to what to do when

get lost in the villages. Furthermore, I sincerely thank bác Chu Thái Hoành, former senior

researcher at the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) for his useful, timely

feedbacks on my research as well as his enthusiasm in sharing knowledge with me. Having

the chance to discuss with him about my research has strengthened me with more

confidences to continue my PhD journey, especially when I was in doubt.

To my colleagues from the CGE group (IBED, UvA) and the Department of

Environmental Economics (IVM, VU), I am lucky to get to know: Hector, Wouter, Lourens,

Kenneth, Majelle, and Bianca. Our coffee-and-tea-fuelled discussions made my PhD

unforgettable. Sometimes they ended up as parts of my scientific work, sometimes as

sparkling memories, I treasure them all. Hector and Wouter, I thank you two for always

being passionate, especially about writing and bird-watching, as your passions motivate me

to try harder! To the lovely secretaries Marjolijn Staarink and Maria Dolorita, and chị Trúc

Ngô (HR) thank you for always being so kind and supportive to me!

To my friends in the Netherlands, there are a few of them I would like to mention

in particular. Ko, the “opa” who understands me really well, thank you a lot for always

listening to me, bringing me pretty flowers and chocolate every time you come over! Baukje,

I enjoyed every lunch, dinner, the walks, and the talks we have had together, so calm and

relaxing! Nai, I believe in your theory about “energy based connectedness” and your letters

are definitely a great source of inspiration for me. Michal and Yonqi, thanks to this PhD we

got to know each other five years ago and I am so delighted to have you two as my

paranimphs!

To my Vietnamese friends, especially Nha Đam, Hương, and Mai Anh with whom a

great part of my life has been shared. Although we are an ocean apart from each other, your

mental supports during the ups and downs of my PhD have always been indispensable to

me! Those summer days when we had dinners together at our home in Amsterdam Oost are

beautiful. Chị Chung, Vân Anh, and Tú Anh thank you for being my dear companions in my

motherhood and PhD journey. It is amazing to witness all of us becoming mothers (of boys)

within just a few years!

To my beloved family in Vietnam, especially my parents, my grandmother, and my

parents in law, thank you for your unconditional love and support! Without your great help

during my two pregnancies, it could not have been possible for me to continue my PhD. Bố

140

mẹ yêu quý, con cảm ơn bố mẹ đã dành cho con rất nhiều tình yêu, sự hi sinh, tin tưởng và

động viên trong suốt thời gian qua! Con cảm ơn mẹ Khanh, bố Thành đã luôn ở bên và đồng

hành cùng gia đình nhỏ của chúng con trong những dấu mốc quan trọng của cuộc đời! Con

cảm ơn bà và dì vì những cảm giác ấm áp và vui vẻ khi ở bên, từ bé và đến tận bây giờ…

Long, Duy, and little Đan, I would love to finish this acknowledgement with the

three of you. My little boys, Duy and Đan, thank you for making me the mother I am now!

Long, our ten years together have seen us taking on different roles, as classmates, close

friends, lovers, and now parents. Every single path in my life, the moments when I am weak

or strong, the moments when I am wise or lost, I feel loved and safe when you are around.

Thank you for your love, your patience, and your very own self. All I need is love, and you’ve

got it all…

Download 149.64 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: