A01 cohe4573 01 se fm. Qxd
Download 1.95 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
1. Teaching and Learning pragmatics, where language and culture meet Norico Ishinara & Andrew D. Coren
4 3
F I G U R E 3 . 2 tude of the imposition in this case) may affect the way that the request is crafted (see Figure 3.2, below). Data elicitation, such as through DCTs and role-play, tends to be a quick and convenient way to collect a relatively large amount of language data. At the same time, pragmatics researchers have pointed out repeatedly that elicited data, particularly written tasks such as the written DCT, do not accurately reflect the way we actually speak. 11 For example, the speakers providing language data may not be familiar with the situations described in the scenarios. Or even if they are, real-life consequences (consequentiality 12 ) are lacking in such imagined contexts, and we may be testing their acting skills along with pragmatic ability. The number of studies that researched effects of the DCT in fact have questioned the validity of DCT-elicited data and have recommended caution in using these data. 13 Data collected from DCTs may reflect the speakers’ knowledge of pragmatics rather than their online productive skills. 14 Speakers providing pragmatic language use might consider the social desirability of what should be said and how it should be said, and demonstrate more of what they perceive as appropriate behavior than what they would actually say in interactive contexts. Also, DCTs may be a valid source of pragmalinguistic 15 (language-focused) data, but might not be reflective of the sociopragmatic (culture-focused) aspects of the speech act. 16 Some have argued that the effects of the DCT may differ depending on 11 Kasper and Dahl (1991); Kasper and Rose (2002). Also see Golato (2003); Kasper (2000) for more discussion. 12 Bardovi-Harlig and Hartford (2005). 13 See for example, Beebe and Cummings (1996); Golato (2003); Hartford and Bardovi-Harlig (1992); Kasper and Rose (2002). 14 Golato (2003). 15 Though somewhat overlapping, sociopragmatics deals with sociocultural norms for linguistic behavior in a given context while pragmalinguistics refers to the actual language forms used to convey the intended meaning (Thomas, 1983). 16 Nelson et al. (2002). |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling