Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 58, No. 4, Winter 2013, 634-656
Download 0.65 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
admin, AJER-58.4-634-656-Poth
methods (pp. 117-139). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association and the Gerontological
Society of America. Manitoba Education, Citizenship & Youth. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. Retrieved from http://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf Mertler, C.A. (1999). Assessing student performance: A descriptive study of the classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Education, 120, 285–96. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/index.html Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment on professional development. Improving Schools, 12, 101-113. doi:10.1177/1365480209105575 Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 175-185. doi:10.1080/13562511003620001 Murtagh, L., & Baker, N. (2009). Feedback to feed forward: Student response to tutors’ written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3, 20-28. Retrieved from http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/prhe/index Murtagh, L., & Webster, M. (2010). Scaffolding teaching, learning and assessment in higher education, Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 1(2). Retrieved from http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/TEAN/issue/view/17 Overbaugh, R. & Schultz, L. (n.d.). Bloom’s taxonomy. Retrieved from http://www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom/blooms_taxonomy.htm Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18, 238–250. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Poth, C. (2011). The untapped potential of developmental evaluation in teacher education programs. In T. Falkenberg & H. Smits (Eds.), The question of evidence in research in teacher education in the context of teacher education program review in Canada (pp. 205-214). Winnipeg, MB: Faculty of Education of the University of Manitoba. Rezaee, Z., Lambert, K., & Ken H., (2006). Electronic commerce education: Analysis of existing courses. Accounting Education, 15, 73-88. doi:10.1080/06939280600579370 Rogers, W. T. (1991). Educational assessment in Canada: Evolution or extinction? The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 37, 179-192. Retrieved from http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/ Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. doi:10.2307/1176145 Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18, 23-27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1999.tb00004.x Stiggins, R. J. (2008). Assessment manifesto: A call for the development of balanced assessment systems. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, CA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Volante, L. (2006). Essential elements in teacher education: Preservice student perspectives. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52, 167-180. Retrieved from http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/ What assessment knowledge and skills do initial teacher education programs address? 655 Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749-770. Retrieved from http://www.csse-scee.ca/CJE/ Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11, 49–65. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994 Notes 1 Although reasonable measures were taken to ensure inclusion of all available courses and course syllabi, there were instances when course syllabi could not be obtained for all teacher education programs. For example, Vancouver Island University, Concordia University, and Campus Saint Jean at the University of Alberta. Thus, the included course syllabi must be viewed as a sample of existing assessment education courses. 2 The exclusion of seven teacher education programs was beyond the researchers’ control where access to course syllabi was not provided. Three programs were under review and four programs were non- responsive to researchers’ requests. Cheryl-Anne Poth, PhD, is a faculty member of the Center for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation within the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Alberta. In this role, she teaches as well as coordinates the mandatory undergraduate classroom assessment course in the pre- service teacher education program. Cheryl brings over a decade of experience including working as a teacher, evaluation consultant and researcher with school boards, post-secondary institutions, and Federal organizations in the areas of Educational programs and Health Services. She brings expertise in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodologies. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling