Английского
§ 2. The category of primary time, as has just been stated, provides
Download 5.01 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
theoretical gr Блох
§ 2. The category of primary time, as has just been stated, provides for the absolutive expression of the time of the process denoted by the verb, i.e. such an expression of it as gives its evaluation, in the long run, in reference to the moment of speech. The formal sign of the opposition constituting this category is, with regular verbs, the dental suffix -(e)d [-d, -t, -id], and with irregular verbs, phonemic interchanges of more or less individual specifications. The suffix marks the verbal form of the past time (the past tense), leaving the opposite form unmarked. Thus, the opposition is to be rendered by the formula "the past tense — the present tense", the latter member representing the non-past tense, according to the accepted opposi- tional interpretation. The specific feature of the category of primary time is, that it di- vides all the tense forms of the English verb into two temporal planes: the plane of the present and the plane of the past, which af- fects also the future forms. Very important in this respect is the structural nature of the expression of the category: the category of primary time is the only verbal category of immanent order which is expressed by inflexional forms. These inflexional forms of the past and present coexist in the same verb-entry of speech with the other, analytical modes of various categorial expression, including the future. Hence, the English verb acquires the two futures: on the one hand, the future of the present, i.e. as prospected from the pre- sent; on the other hand, the future of the past, i.e. as prospected from the past. The following example will be illustrative of the whole four-member correlation: Jill returns from her driving class at five o'clock. At five Jill returned from her driving class. I know that Jill will return from her driving class at five o'clock. I knew that at five Jill would return from her driving class. An additional reason for identifying the verbal past-present time system as a separate grammatical category is provided by the fact that this system is specifically marked by the do-forms of the in- definite aspect with their various, 141 but inherently correlated functions. These forms, found in the inter- rogative constructions (Does he believe the whole story?), in the negative constructions (He doesn't believe the story), in the ellipti- cal response constructions and elsewhere, are confined only to the category of primary time, i.e. the verbal past and present, not com- ing into contact with the expression of the future. Download 5.01 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling