Английского
§ 4. The category of development, unlike the categories of person
Download 5.01 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
theoretical gr Блох
§ 4. The category of development, unlike the categories of person, number, and time, has a verbid representation, namely, it is repre- sented in the infinitive. This fact, for its part, testifies to another than temporal nature of the continuous. With the infinitive, the category of development, naturally, ex- presses the same meaningful contrast between action in progress and action not in progress as with the finite forms of the verb. Cf.: Kezia and her grandmother were taking their siesta together. ------It was but natural for Kezia and her grandmother to be taking their siesta together. What are you complaining about?——Is there really anything for you to be complaining about? But in addition to this purely categorial distinction, the form of the continuous infinitive has a tendency to acquire quite a special meaning in combination with modal verbs, namely that of probability. This meaning is aspectual in a broader sense than the "inner character" of action: the aspectuality amounts here to an outer appraisal of the denoted process. Cf.: Paul must wait for you, you needn't be in a hurry. Paul must be waiting for us, so let's hurry up. The first of the two sentences expresses Paul's obligation to wait, whereas the second sentence renders the speaker's supposition of the fact. The general meaning of probability is varied by different additional shades depending on the semantic type of the modal verb and the corresponding contextual conditions, such as uncertainty, incredu- lity, surprise, etc. Cf.: But can she be taking Moyra's words so personally? If the flight went smoothly, they may be approaching the West Coast. You must be losing money over this job. The action of the continuous infinitive of probability, 162 in accord with the type of the modal verb and the context, may re- fer not only to the plane of the present, but also to the plane of the future. Cf.: Ann must be coming soon, you'd better have things put in order. The gerund and the participle do not distinguish the category of development as such, but the traces of progressive meaning are in- herent in these forms, especially in the present participle, which it- self is one of the markers of the category (in combination with the categorial auxiliary). In particular, these traces are easily disclosed in various syntactic participial complexes. Cf.: The girl looked straight into my face, smiling enigmatically. → The girl was smiling enigmatically as she looked straight into my face. We heard the leaves above our heads rustling in the wind. → We heard how the leaves above our heads were rustling in the wind. However, it should be noted, that the said traces of meaning are still traces, and they are more often than not subdued and neutral- ised. Download 5.01 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling