Article in Asian Social Science · March 014 doi: 10. 5539/ass v10n8p210 citations 170 reads 4,239 authors: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects
Download 261.72 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
The Improvement of Students Academic Performance
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kamenetz, A. (2011). Gates Foundation bets on Facebook app to help kids graduate. Fast Company. Retrieved www.ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol. 10, No. 8; 2014 220 from http://www.fastcompany.com/1725665/gates-foundation-bets-on-facebook-app-to-help-kids-graduate Kear, K. (2010). Online social networking communities: A best practice guide for educators. London: Routledge. Kirkup, G. (2010). Academic blogging: Academic practice and academic identity. London Review of Education, 8(1), 75-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14748460903557803 Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237-1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 Kolek, E. A., & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NAPSA J., (1), 1-25. Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationship between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research. Laird, T. F. N., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y Leask, B. (2004). Internationalization outcomes for all students using information and communication technologies (ICTs). Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(4), 336-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315303261778 Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J. G., & Decker, S. (2010). Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC, US, 2010. Liu, T., Liang, J., Wang, H., Chan, T., & Wei, L. (2003). Embedding educlick in classroom to enhance interaction. International conference computers in education (ICCE), 117-125. Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 207-216. Luzon, M. J. (2009). Scholarly hyper-writing: The function of links in academic weblogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 75-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20937 Mack, D., Behler, A., Roberts, B., & Rimland, E. (2007). Reaching students with Facebook: Data and best practices. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8(2). Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: It is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923606 Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18). Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook. London, UK: Routledge. Matney, M., & Borland, K. (2009). Facebook, blogs, tweets: How staff and units can use social networking to enhance student learning. Annual meeting of the National Association for Student Personnel Administrators, Seattle, WA. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 709-734. McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction and communication, user control and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674 Medlin, B., & Green, K. W. Jr. (2009). Enhancing performance through goal setting, engagement, and optimism. Industrial Management dan Data Systems, 109(7), 943-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570910982292 Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2012). Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: How today’s higher education faculty use social media, 2012. (Babson Survey Research Group). Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions. www.ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol. 10, No. 8; 2014 221 Nalwa, K., & Anand, A. P. (2003). Internet addiction in Students: A cause of concern. Cyber psychology and Behavior, 6(6), 653-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725441 Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Liu, S., & Hughes, A. L. (2010). Crisis in a networked world: Features of Computer mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 467-480. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002 Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C., & Welsh, A. (2011). Enabled backchannel: Conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of Documentation, 67(2), 214-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411111109449 Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110306 Rutherford, C. (2010). Using Online Social Media to Support Preserves Student Engagement. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). Selwyn, N., & Grant, L. (2009). Researching the realities of social software use: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902921907 Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. F. H. (2006). Use of classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879802 Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research ECAR. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ecar So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Students’ perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 Yanli, J., Yi, Z., & Yuli, L. (n. d.). Effects of System Characteristics on Users' Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites. Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 2010 Seventh International Conference on, (12-14), 529-533. Zhu, C. (2012). Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning. Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, R. (2010). Collaborative Strategic Reading with University EFL Learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67-94. Copyrights Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). View publication stats Download 261.72 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling