Conceptual review and meta-analysis of school effectiveness
JAAP699
Factors
| |
Components | |
Achievement, orientation, high expectations |
|
Educational leadership |
|
Consensus and cohesion among staff |
|
Curriculum quality/ opportunity to learn |
|
School climate |
|
|
|
Evaluative potential |
|
Parental involvement |
|
Classroom climate |
|
Effective learning time |
|
re 5) Studies on instructional effectiveness
As the most relative strands of research on teaching and classroom processes for the topic at hand are studies on characteristics of effective teachers, and studies that go under the label of “process-product studies”. This latter category of studies was also inspired by Carroll’s (1963) model of teaching and learning and off-springs of this model, such as the models of mastery learning (Bloom, 1976) and “direct teaching” (e.g. Doyle, 1985).
The research results have been reviewed by, among others, Stallings (1985), Brophy and Good (1986), and Creemers (1994) and quantitatively synthesized in meta-analyses by Walberg (1984), Fraser et al. (1987) and Wang, Haertel and Walberg (1993). These latter authors incidentally have also included variables outside the classroom situation, like the student’s relationships with peers, and the home environment (e.g. television viewing) in their analyses which they label under the heading of “educational productivity”.
In the sixties and seventies the effectiveness of certain personal characteristics of teachers was particularly studied. Medley & Mitzel, 1963; Rosenshine & Furst, 1973 and Gage, 1965 are among those who reviewed the research findings. From these it emerged that there was hardly any consistency found between personal characteristics of the teacher like warmheartedness or inflexibleness on the one hand, and pupil achievement on the other. When studying teaching styles (Davies, 1972), the behavioural repertoire of teachers was generally looked at more than the deeply-rooted aspects of their personality. Within the framework of “research on teaching” there followed a period in which much attention was given to observing teacher behaviour during lessons. The results of these observations, however, in as far as they were related to pupil achievement, seldom revealed a link with pupil performance (see Lortie, 1973, for instance). In a following phase more explicit attention was given to the relation between observed teacher behaviour and pupil achievement. This research is identified in the literature as “process-product studies”. Variables which emerged “strongly” in the various studies were the following (Weeda, 1986, p. 68):
-
Download 235,5 Kb.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2025
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling