Foci of a Green Economy
Natural Capital
Following from scientific proof of ecological degradation and the logic that capital was pre-
viously misallocated in economies, Green Economy reasoning understands this misallocation to
be the result of a failure by markets to recognize the true value of biodiversity ecosystem services
(ten Brink et al. 2012). The solution for correcting this short-sightedness, as proposed by Green
Economy orators, is for the recognition, efficient allocation and fair distribution cost and bene-
fits of the caretaking or damaging of natural benefits (ten Brink et al. 2012). Essentially, what is
needed is a structural transformation of the economy. For this, efforts to financially account for
and price nature must be made, allowing a better integration into the market structure and main-
streaming it in the financial sector – recognizing the value of “natural capital” (Pearce et al. 1989,
ten Brink et al. 2012, UNEP 2011).
Hence, nature in many Green Economy texts is discussed in terms of exchangeable, public
ecosystem services and goods. Attempts to put a price to the range of provisioning, regulating,
cultural and supporting services (e.g. freshwater, pollination, recreation and nutrient cycling re-
spectively) abound (ten Brink et al. 2012). Nature therefore is mainly viewed as the base of the
Green Economy - a provider and supplier that must be maintained, built up and invested into as
it not only sustains human well-being but is also a source of employment in the long run. For the
Green Economy, forestry, agriculture, freshwater and fisheries are the most important natural
capital sectors to undergo ‘greening’ so as to ensure its successful achievement, particularly for
rural areas in developing countries with high poverty indices. Thus, embarking on path of refor-
estation, sustainable agriculture, temporary reduced fishing effort and efficient water manage-
ment are among the main recommendations made (UNEP 2011).
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |