Content introduction chapter-i assessing learner's writing skills according to cefr scales

REFERENCES

1. 
   Adams, R. J. 2006. Reliability as a measurement design effect. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31: 162–172. [Google Scholar]
   
2. 
   Adams, R. J. and Wu, M. L. 2009. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10: 355–370. [Google Scholar]
   
3. 
   Alderson, J.C., Figueras, N., Kuijper, H., Nold, G., Takala, S. and Tardieu, C. 2006. Analysing tests of reading and listening in relation to the common European framework of reference: The experience of the Dutch CEFR construct project. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3: 3–30. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
   
4. 
   Alderson, J. C. and Huhta, A. 2005. The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22: 301–320. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
   
5. 
   Beck, B. and Klieme, E., eds. 2007. Sprachliche Kompetenzen – Konzepte und Messungen. DESI Studie [Linguistic competences—Constructs and their measurement. DESI –Study], Weinheim, , Germany: Beltz. [Google Scholar]
   
6. 
   Brennan, R. L. 2001. Generalizability theory, New York, NY: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
   
7. 
   Brennan, R. L. 2007. An NCME instructional module on generalizability theory items. Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement, : 225–232. [Google Scholar]
   
8. 
   Briggs, D. C. and Wilson, M. 2007. Generalizability in item response modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44: 131–155. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
   
9. 
   Brindley, G. 2000. “Task difficulty and task generalizability in competency-based writing assessment”. In Studies in immigrant English language assessment, Edited by: Brindley, G. Vol. 1, 125–157. Sydney, , Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University. [Google Scholar]
   
10. 
    Brindley, G. 2001. “Investigating rater consistency in competency-based language assessment”. In Studies in immigrant English language assessment, Edited by: Brindley, G. and Burrows, C. Vol. 2, 59–80. Sydney, , Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University. [Google Scholar]
    
11. 
    Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R. and Yule, G. 1984. Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment, Cambridge, , UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
    
12. 
    Cambridge ESOL: Handbook for teachers. (n.d.) Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge. https://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/109740_cae_hb_dec08.pdf (https://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/109740_cae_hb_dec08.pdf) [Google Scholar]
    
13. 
    Chiu, C. W. T. and Wolfe, E. W. 2002. A method for analyzing sparse data matrices in the generalizability theory framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26(3): 321–338. [Google Scholar]
    
14. 
    Cizek, G. J., Bunch, M. B. and Koons, H. 2004. Setting performance standards: Contemporary methods. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(4): 31–50. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
    
15. 
    Congdon, P. J. and McQueen, J. 2000. The stability of rater severity in large-scale assessment programs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37: 163–178. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
    
16. 
    Council of Europe. (2001). Common European reference framework for languages. Strasbourg, France: Author. http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/?L=E&M=/documents_intro/common_framework.html (http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/?L=E&M=/documents_intro/common_framework.html) [Google Scholar]
    

1^ Adams, R. J. 2006. Reliability as a measurement design effect. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31: 162–172. [Google Scholar]

2^ Alderson, J.C., Figueras, N., Kuijper, H., Nold, G., Takala, S. and Tardieu, C. 2006. Analysing tests of reading and listening in relation to the common European framework of reference: The experience of the Dutch CEFR construct project. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3: 3–30. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]

3^ Brennan, R. L. 2001. Generalizability theory, New York, NY: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]

4^ Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R. and Yule, G. 1984. Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment, Cambridge, , UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]