Case study (illustration de-aliasing)
DUAL DOPPLER RETRIEVAL Po Valley-radars and terrain analysis
Data Gridding Radar data - Polar data
- 4 elevation angles(deg) 0.5, 1.4, 2.3, 3.2
- ray resolutions 0.25km x 440 bins, beam width: 0.9 deg
Three Fundamental Equations: - Radial Velocities (from each radar)
- Mass Continuity
Iterative method: Boundary conditions: - zero vertical velocity on ground
- zero horizontal velocity gradient on ground (optional: simplify computation w/o loss of accuracy)
Velocity-Azimuth Display (VAD)
Interpolation of the model wind vector to the observation location. Projection of the wind vector on the slanted direction of the radar beam. Broadening of the radar beam: Gaussian averaging kernel. Bending of the radar beam: Snell's law.
One-month (January 2002) comparison of Swedish radial winds and HIRLAM model equivalents Figure: rms difference as a function of measurement range. Rms difference for thinned raw data is significantly higher than for SOs. Method used to deter-mine optimal averaging length scales 10 km for 22 km model)
WP 3: Data assimilation
WP 3: Data assimilation
WP 3: Data assimilation
WP 3: Data assimilation
WP 3: Data assimilation
Covariances of innovation vectors (v=y-Hxb):
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |