Discuss both views and give your opinion

Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The protection of wildlife has become a frequent subject of the debate with arguments for and against. Personally, I believe that we are giving too much attention and money to secure all wild animals, as now will be explained.
There are several reasons why authorities should not be spending their time and money to protect all species of wildlife. First of all, public money is limited. Protection of all species would cost more than governments can afford. Secondly, we do not have to save all of wild species. If we allow some species to disappear, it is not a totally disaster. For example, disappearance of dinosaurs did not cause any harm to other species of wildlife but slightly triggered emergence of other species like the mammal.
From my perspective, governments can simply protect wildlife without spending too much money. Authorities can raise awareness of people by imposing stricter punishments on people who harm wild species or can impose heavy fines for people who hunt wildlife for food or joy and this can discourage other people from hunting wildlife.
In conclusion, while I think we should spend money for wildlife and provide them with good food and shelter, I believe we do not have spend too much money on these actions.