Dual Contrast Molecular Imaging Allows Noninvasive Characterization of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury After Coronary Vessel Occlusion in Mice by mri running title


Download 1.2 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet6/7
Sana23.12.2017
Hajmi1.2 Mb.
#22870
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

Figure Legends: 

Figure 1. Static and flow chamber adhesion assays showing strong binding of LIBS-MPIOs on 

activated platelets. A: Representative microscopy images of MPIOs attachment under static 

conditions. Attachment of LIBS-MPIOs was significantly higher than for non-targeted control-

MPIOs. (MPIO exemplarily depicted by arrows) B: Representative microscopy images of flow 

chamber adhesion assays demonstrating that more LIBS-MPIOs attach to the microthrombi 

under flow as compared to control-MPIOs. Time point assessment for optimal myocardial 

platelet imaging is demonstrated in C. For staining of platelets, a rat anti-mouse CD41 antibody 

was used, which then was detected by a biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IgG. Red staining was 

obtained by alkaline phosphate with a corresponding substrate kit. Platelet aggregates with 

bound LIBS-MPIO were quantified at different time points after reperfusion (10min, 2h, 4h, 6h, 

8h, 10h, and 12h). Maximum amounts of absolute LIBS-MPIO-platelet-aggregates were found 

clinically relevant field strengths. Mol Imaging. 2008;7:59-67.



Figure Legends: 

F

Figu

u

gu

re 1. Stat

t

ic



ic

a

an



nd

nd

f



f

f

lo



l

w



ch

ch



cham

am

am



be

be

e



r

r



ad

ad

a



h

he

he



s

sion


n

n

a



a

ssay


y

ys

s



show

ow

ow



in

in

g



st

stro



ro

o

n



ng

g b


b

in

in



in

d

di



ing

ng

g



o

of

f



f LI

LI

I



BS

BS

BS



-M

-M

MPI



PI

PI

Os



Os

Os

o



o

on 


ac

c

ti



ti

tiva


va

vate


te

te

d



pl

pl



pl

at

at



at

el

elet



et

ts.


.

 

A:



A:

R

R



Rep

ep

re



e

se

se



s

nt

nt



nt

at

at



at

iv

iv



iv

e

e



mi

mi

mi



cr

cr

cr



o

os

os



co

co

opy



py

py i


i

ma

ma



ma

ge

ge



ges

s

s



of

o

of M



M

MP

PI



PIOs

Os

Os



a

at

tt



tt

ac

ac



chm

hm

men



en

nt 


un

un



und

d

der 



r

st

t



at

at

a



ic

ic 


conditions. At

At

t



ta

ta

ta



ch

ch

h



me

me

m



nt

nt

n



o

o



f

LI

LI



LI

BS

BS



BS

-M

-M



M

PI

PI



P

Os

Os



Os

w

w



w

as

as



as

s

s



s

ig

ig



g

ni

ni



n

fi

fi



f

ca

ca



c

nt

nt



t

ly

ly



ly

h

h



h

ig

ig



ig

he

he



he



r

th

h



h

an

an



an

f

f



f

or

or



or

n

n



n

on

on



o

-t

-t



ar

ar

ar



ge

ge

ge



te

te

te



d

control-



 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 


DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008157 

28 


2h after reperfusion, with significant differences compared to all other time points (p<0.05). A 

representative image of a LIBS-MPIO-platelet-aggregate is shown in the inlay (platelets = red, 

MPIOs = round/brown structure, see arrows, x100 magnification). 

Figure 2. Dual imaging with LIBS-MPIO and gadolinium. Representative sections of a short 

axis image from the medial ventricular areas are depicted. For animals injected with LIBS-MPIO 

(A, upper row) and control-MPIO (B, lower row), baseline scans are shown on the left. After 

contrast agent injection, a continuous signal decrease can be seen in ischemic areas of animals 

with LIBS-MPIO-injection (red arrows) as the typical susceptibility artifact induced by MPIOs. 

No signal effect is visible in animals with control-MPIO-injection. After imaging for 37min, 

gadolinium was injected to observe the LGE for detection of myocardial necrosis, which is 

present in both treatment groups (see yellow arrow). 

 

Figure 3. Quantification of myocardial necrosis, inflammation and platelet accumulation. LGE 

was not influenced by the injection of LIBS-MPIO and control-MPIO (A). Simultaneous staining 

for platelets (CD41, red) and neutrophils (Gr1, black) shows  platelet-neutrophil-conjugates (B

20x magnification; C, negative control omitting primary antibody; D, 100x magnification, with 

an example of bound MPIOs (arrows)), with comparable amounts of such conjugates in both 

groups (E). For quantification and characterization of platelet accumulation (F) depicts a 

representative myocardial section with platelet aggregates stained by anti-CD41 

immunohistochemistry and direct visualization of bound MPIOs (G; arrows). No platelet 

accumulation can be observed in non-ischemic myocardium such as the septal wall (H). 

Microthrombi are equally distributed in both groups (I), whereas MPIO-binding was 

No signal effect is visible in animals with control-MPIO-injection. After imagin

n



g

g fo


fo

o



37

37

37



mi

mi

min,



n,

n,

 



ff

gadolinium was injected to observe the LGE for detection of myocardial necrosis, which is 

pr

r

es



es

s

en



en

ent


t

in



in

in

b



b

b

ot



ot

ot

h tr



tr

r

ea



ea

eatm


t

ent groups (see yellow arr

r

ow

ow



o

)

). 



Fi

Fi

gu

gu

gure

re

re 3

3

.

Qu

Qu



Qu

an

an



t

ti

ifi



i

ica


ca

ti

ti



i

on

on



n o

o

f m



my

my

oc



oc

oc

ar



ar

ar

d



di

dia


al

al n


n

nec


ec

ec

r



ro

r

si



si

sis,


s,

i

i



n

n

f



fla

am

am



ma

ma

ma



t

tion


on

on a


a

and


nd

d p


p

p

la



la

a

te



e

le

le



t

ac



ac

a

cu



cu

c

mu



mu

mu

l



lati

ti

ion



n

n. L


LG

LGE


was not influe



ue

e

nc



nc

nc

ed



ed

d

b



b

b



th



th

h

e in



in

in

je



je

je

ct



t

t

io



io

io



n

of

o



o

L

L



L

IB

IB



B

S-

S-



S

MP

MP



MP

IO

IO



IO

a

a



a

nd

nd



c

c

c



on

on

on



tr

tr

tr



ol

ol

ol



-M

-M

M



PI

PI

PI





(

(

(



A

A

A

).

).



).

S

S



im

m

m



ul

ul

ul



ta

ta

ta



ne

ne

ne



ous stainin

ng

g



 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 


DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008157 

29 


significantly higher in animals injected with LIBS-MPIO than with control-MPIOs (J). A 

significant correlation between the amount of bound LIBS-MPIO and microthrombi in ischemic 

areas is evident (K).

Figure 4. Molecular MRI noninvasively characterizes platelet adhesion/aggregation and 

myocardial necrosis. Signal quantification is pooled for the anterior and anterolateral segments, 

representing the areas of ischemia (A, arrows), as described in detail in “Methods”. After LIBS-

MPIO-injection, a significant signal decrease as the typical MPIO-induced effect can be 

observed (B, red line), suggesting effective binding of LIBS-MPIO to platelets. After 

gadolinium-injection, the signal in LIBS-MPIO-injected mice increases above baseline 

(p<0.003). Mice injected with control-MPIO demonstrate no MPIO-induced signal decrease (B

blue line). CA = contrast agent; Gd = Gadolinium.



Figure 5. P2Y

12

-/-



 

mice demonstrate reduced platelet and neutrophil infiltration. No signal 

increase can be observed after injection of LIBS-MPIO (A), similar to animals with control-

MPIO (B). However, the presence of myocardial necrosis can be confirmed after the injection of 

gadolinium in both groups (right, yellow arrows). 

 

Figure 6. MR signal quantification in P2Y

12

-/- 


mice. The area of LGE is significantly smaller in 

P2Y


12

-/-


 mice (A). As a potential consequence of the expected lower platelet accumulation in 

P2Y


12

-/-


 mice, no significant difference in the MR signal after MPIO injection was observed 

between control-MPIO (green line) and LIBS-MPIO (yellow line) in these animals (B). Infarct 

size was significantly smaller in P2Y

12

-/-



 mice in TTC staining (C) and echocardiographic 

gadolinium-injection, the signal in LIBS-MPIO-injected mice increases above b

b

a

a



asel

el

l



in

in



e

p<0.003). Mice injected with control-MPIO demonstrate no MPIO-induced signal decrease (B

bl

l

ue



ue

e

l



l

l

in



in

in

)



e)

e). CA


CA

CA

=



=

c

c



c

o

on



ontrast agent; Gd = Gadolinium

um

m.



Fi

Fi

gu

gu

gure

re

re 5

5

.

P2

P2



P2Y

Y

Y



12

12

2



-

-/-


mi

mi

m



c

ce

ce



d

d

d



em

em

o



on

on

st



st

st

ra



ra

ra

te



te

te

r



r

e

ed



educ

uc

uced



ed

ed

p



p

pla


la

l

te



te

e

le



e

et 


t

a

a



a

nd

nd



d n

n

n



eu

eu

eu



tr

tr

tr



op

op

phi



hi

hil


in



in

f

fi



l

lt

lt



ra

rati


ti

tion


on

n

.



. No

No

No



 sig

ig

gna



na

al 


l

ncrease can b

b

b

e



e

e

ob



ob

b

se



se

se

rv



rv

v

ed



ed

e

a



a

a

ft



ft

f

e



e

e



r

r

in



in

n

je



je

je

ct



ct

ct

io



i



of

of



of

L

L



L

IB

IB



IB

S-

S-



S

MP

MP



MP

IO

IO



(

(

(



A

A

A

),

),



),

s

s



im

im

im



il

i

i



ar

ar

r



t

t



o

an



an

an

im



im

im

al



al

s

s



s

wi

wi



wi

th

th



h

c

c



c

ontrol-


 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 


DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008157 

30 


assessment demonstrated a trend towards better preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction 

in P2Y


12

-/-


 mice (D) compared to WT.

 

Figure 7. Quantification of platelet accumulation and inflammation in P2Y

12

-/-


 mice. Only 

minimal platelet accumulation was found in ischemic/reperfused areas (A, anti-CD41 staining), 

and the number of platelet-neutrophil-aggregates decreased (B, CD41/Gr1-stain). Comparison of 

WT versus P2Y

12

-/- 


mice confirms a significantly smaller number of microthombi (C), and the 

number of bound MPIOs was significantly reduced in all P2Y

12

-/-


 mice, towards the level of WT 

mice (D). When adding the data obtained with the P2Y

12

-/-


 mice to the data obtained with the 

WT-animals, correlation between bound MPIOs and microthrombi remains highly significant 

(E; orange = P2Y

12

-/-



-animals), whereas the amount of platelet-neutrophil-aggregates was 

reduced in P2Y

12

-/- 


animals (F). 

Figure 8. Quantification and correlation of myocardial necrosis, LIBS-MPIO and LGE effects: 

In H&E-staining, the proportion of myocardial necrosis was not significantly different between 

LIBS-MPIO and control-MPIO- injected animals, whereas the myocardial necrosis was lower in 

P2Y


12

-/-


 mice (A/B). The extent of the area with a LIBS-MPIO-induced effect in MRI correlated 

well with the extent of the LGE area of the left ventricle (C), and with the area of necrosis in 

histology (D). When pooling these data with the results from the P2Y

12

-/-



 mice, the area of 

necrosis correlated well with the LGE-area (E).

 

 

WT-animals, correlation between bound MPIOs and microthrombi remains highl



hl

l



y

si

si



s

gn

gn



gn

if

if



if

ic

ic



ican

an

an



t



E; orange = P2Y

12

-/-


-animals), whereas the amount of platelet-neutrophil-aggregates was 

e

e



du

du

u



ce

ce

e



d

d



in

in

in P



P

P

2



2

2Y

12



12

2

-/-



-/-

 

a



animals (F). 

Fi

Fi

gu

gu

gure

re

re 8

8

.

Qu

Qu



Qu

an

an



t

ti

ifi



i

ica


ca

ti

ti



i

on

on



n a

a

nd



nd

d

c



c

or

or



orre

re

re



la

la

la



ti

ti

on



on

on

o



o

o

f



my



my

myoc


oc

o

ar



ar

d

dia



al

al n


n

nec


ec

ec

ro



ro

osi


si

si

s,



s,

L

L



LIB

IB

IB



S

S-

S-



M

MP

MPI



I

I



O an


an

a

d



d L


L

LGE


E

e



ef

effe


fe

c

cts



s

s: 


n H&E-stain

n

in



in

in

g,



g,

g

t



t

t

he



he

he

p



p

p

ro



ro

r

po



po

o

rt



rt

t

io



i

i



n

of



of

o

m



m

m

yo



yo

yo

ca



ca

ca

rd



rd

d

ia



ia

a



ne

ne



e

cr

cr



c

os

os



o

is

s



s

w

w



w

as

as



as

n

n



n

ot

ot



ot

s

s



ig

g

g



ni

ni

ni



fi

fi

fi



ca

ca

ca



nt

nt

nt



ly

ly

l



d

d

d



if

if

if



fe

fe

fe



re

re

re



nt

n

n



 between 

 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 



Figure 1

10 μM

10 μM

B

A



Control

LIBS


0

200


400

600


800

Control


LIBS

0

200



400

600


***

***


MPIO

C

0

10 m

10 m


10 m

MPIO

10 m


10 m

p<0.05

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

LIBS-MPI

Os

bound to pla

tel

et

s

Time of reperfusion

LIBS-

MPIO

control-

MPIO

600

400

200

0

Numbe

r of MPI

Os

p<0.0001

p<0.0001

800

600

400

200

Numbe

r of MPI

Os

LIBS-

MPIO

control-

MPIO

B

C



C

C

10 m



0

10 m


m

m

p<



<

0

05

05

p<0 05

5

p<

p<

0.05

05

10

10

0

0

12

12

0

0

a

a

e

te

e

le

le

le

s

ts

MP

MP

IO

IO

MP

MP

MP

IO

IO

O

p<

p<

p

0.

0.

0.

00

00

00

01

01

01

80

0

0

0

600

400

0

20

20

0

0

0

Nu

Nu

u

mb

mb

m

er

e

of

MPI

Os

Nu

mb

mb

m

er

e

of

MPI

Os

Nu

mb

mb

m

er

e

 of

 MPI

Os

LI

LI

S

BS

B

-

MP

MP

MP

IO

IO

IO

o

co

co

nt

o

ro

ro

l-

MP

MP

PIO

IO

IO

 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 



control-

MPIO


LIBS-MPIO

pre control-MPIO

15‘ post control-MPIO

30‘ post Gd

22‘ post control-MPIO

37‘ post control-MPIO

pre LIBS-MPIO

15‘ post LIBS-MPIO

22‘ post LIBS-MPIO

37‘ post LIBS-MPIO

30‘ post Gd

O

A



B

Figure 2


re LI

LI

BS



BS

BS

-M



-M

-M

PI



PI

PI

O



1

O

5‘ post LIBS-MPIO



22‘ post 

LI



LI

LI

BS



B

B

-MPIO



37‘ pos

s



LI

LI



LI

BS

B



B

-MPIO


30‘ post 

 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 



A

B

A



B

CD41/Gr1-IHC of ischemic areas; x20



p=0.0047

R

2

=0.8244

p=0.0047

R

2

=0.8244

CD41-IHC of ischemic areas; x20

100 m

CD41-IHC of non-ischemic areas; x20



100 m

C

D



E

F

G



H

I

J



K

100 m


100 m

control-IHC of ischemic areas; x20



bound MPIOs

p=0.0034

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

LGE-Area in %

 of 

left 

ve

ntri

cl

e

LG

E

n.s.

CD41/Gr1-IHC of ischemic areas; x100

20 m

0

5

10

15

20

25

Pl

atel

et-n

eutrophil-conjugate

s

n.s.

5

0

10

15

20

25

30

CD41-IHC of ischemic areas; x100

20 m

n.s.

Pl

atel

ets in i

schemi



are

a

Figure 3


20

40

60

80

100

120

140

G

G



H

H

C of is



is

ch

ch



em

em

ic



i

a

re



re

as; x100


20 m

el

et-ne

u

G

G



Pl

at

e

5

0

10

 by guest on December 22, 2017

http://circ.ahajournals.org/

Downloaded from 



Figure 4

A

B



CA-injection

* LIBS-MPIO vs. control-MPIO for all post CA-values: p<0.02

§ signal increase of mean values in LIBS-MPIO before vs. after Gd-injection: p<0.03

Gd-injection



WT control-MPIO

WT LIBS-MPIO

*

§




Download 1.2 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling