Comment 3: Page 3 row 36 there is a double ’,’ Please, remove ”Such a platform could provide an energy-efficient, resilient, scalable, flexible,, and dynamic network for sustainable DCs [18].”
Response: The issue highlighted by the reviewer has been corrected. Moreover, the entire manuscript has been recheck to remove all such occurrences.
Comment 4: Page 4 row 6 the acronym RES is never explained
Response: The issue highlighted by the reviewer has been corrected in the revised manuscript.
Comment 5: Change the background color to white of figures 5, 6 and 7
Response: All the concerned figures have been removed in the revised manuscript and they have been replaced by separate algorithms (Section 5, page 7-10).
Comment 6: Enlarge the size of Figure 10
Response: The text size in the concerned figure 10 (Figure 6 in revised manuscript) has been enlarged in the revised manuscript (Fig. 6, page 11).
Comment 7: Add more updated references. Ref 14 authors are missing, please verify it.
Response: The references have been updated as suggested by the reviewer. More updated and latest references have been added in the revised manuscript.
RESPONSE: The authors want to thanks the reviewer as the comments provided have allowed us to transform the entire manuscript to improve the quality and presentation. The authors have reworked on each and every section, re-framed them and added suitable and significant content to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Comment 1: The topics proposed in this paper are very interesting, but I would like to suggest you to improve the abstract of the paper, making it more concise and clear.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |