Environmental Management: Principles and practice
BOX 3.4 A selection of treaties, agreements, etc., relating to
Download 6.45 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
5 2020 03 04!03 12 11 PM
BOX 3.4 A selection of treaties, agreements, etc., relating to
environmental management Internationally shared resources In 1972 the USA and Canada signed the Great Lakes Transboundary Agreement for the comprehensive management of the water quality of the Great Lakes. Protection of endangered species 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. 1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). 1979 Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife. Protection of environmentally important areas There are many areas agreed by scientists, social scientists and other specialists to be in need of formal protection. Protection may be supported by a state; privately funded by a group or individual; or by an international body or bodies. For example, there is a worldwide scatter of Biosphere Reserves; the UK has state-protected Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs); many countries have reserves and national parks. Some conservation areas are established and watched over by international treaty—the 1971 Ramsar Convention (Convention on Wetlands of International Importance) provides a framework for protection of wetland habitats, especially those used by migrating birds. The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) supports and oversees many sites of special cultural value. The Antarctic In Antarctica territorial claims have been put aside (but not eliminated) under the Antarctic Treaty which came into force in 1960 (signed 1959) (Theutenberg, 1984) (see Figure 3.3). Basically this is an international treaty by which signatories have agreed to keep Antarctica and its surrounding seas open for scientific research by all nations deemed to be pursuing scientific exploration south of 60°S. The treaty requires demilitarization, no nuclear weapons and a commitment to conservation (Triggs, 1988; Holdgate, 1990). (For a review of Antarctic law see Auburn, 1982; Beck, 1986.) While it has been quite a flexible treaty, modified as need arose, it has been put under some pressure as interest in resource development (notably oil, minerals, krill, squid and fish) comes into conflict with its conservation requirements. There are also demands from non-treaty nations (basically those which have not maintained a significant research presence there) and some NGOs for there to be changes to give the whole world (probably through the UN), not just signatory nations, control of Antarctica (a coalition of over 200 NGOs and non-treaty nations—the Atlantic and Southern Ocean Coalition— has been seeking such a goal). There have been some moves which in theory could allow mineral resources to be used—the 1988 Convention on the BUSINESS AND LAW 53 FIGURE 3.3 The Antarctic: (a) territorial claims; (b) possible economic zones to 200 nautical miles, and limit of Antarctic Treaty (60°S lat) continued . . . CHAPTER THREE 54 Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities allows exploitation only if very stringent environmental assessments are made and accepted by treaty nations. The Falklands conflict is a warning that if potentially attractive mineral resources are identified territorial claims may reappear in Antarctica. Transboundary pollution In 1965 Canada and the USA became involved in the Trail Smelter pollution case. The outcome was acceptance that no state has the right to permit use of its territory in such a way as to injure another territory. The 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm was in part called for by Sweden, because of concern about acid deposition generated by other countries. In 1979 the Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution addressed the problem of transboundary sulphur dioxide atmospheric emissions, but did not lay down firm rules. By the late 1980s the resolution of transboundary impacts had become an increasingly active field of diplomacy (Carroll, 1988). The 1991 UN Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context obliged signatory states to act to control transboundary environmental impacts from proposed activities. Controls on global warming The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (signed at UNCED 1992) obliged signatories to stabilize CO 2 emissions at 1990 levels by AD 2000. The 1997 Kyoto Conference was intended to settle details of CO 2 reduction and to see that targets were enforced by international law. However, a coalition of USA industries was opposed to any limit on greenhouse gas emissions, and lobbied to hinder agreements. Finally agreements were made by the EU to make an 8 per cent cut in emissions by AD 2010 and arrangements for Tradeable Emissions Quotas (TEQs) were approved (with Russia able to sell its unused quotas to the USA) (see chapter 12 for discussion of TEQs). Ozone damage controls Efforts to phase out and if possible ban the use of CFCs were made at the 1985 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer. The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer—revised 1990—derives from the Vienna Convention. The protocol aimed for a 50 per cent cut in CFCs over a short period (24, mainly developed nations signed—by 1994 this had increased to 74, including some developing countries) and was signed in the face of considerable uncertainty about ozone damage. The protocol is a landmark, in that for the first time nations agreed to impose significant costs on their economies in order to protect the global environment. India and China held out, seeking agreement for funding to assist with ozone controls. BUSINESS AND LAW 55 The Law of the Sea In 1954 the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships was undertaken to try to reduce the discharge of waste oil from oil-tankers and other ship-related discharges (with limited success). For ocean pollution control to be effective, agreements that cover rivers, effluent outfalls, air pollution, etc. are required, because pollutants arrive in the sea from such sources (Boyle, 1992). In 1958 the First Conference on Law of the Sea took place (the second was in 1960), and in 1959 the UN established the International Maritime Organization to deal with marine safety, law, pollution control, etc. From the early 1970s some of the nations with coastlines began to declare extensions of their territorial waters from the accepted 3 to 12, or even 200 nautical miles. The 1950 Continental Shelf Convention was largely behind this trend towards extension of exclusive sovereign rights to continental shelf or seabed resources. To try to formalize these trends the Third Conference on Law of the Sea was held in 1974. The UNEP’s Regional Seas Programme has brought together coastal states of a number of marine regions, resulting in several Regional Seas Treaties, covering: the Mediterranean; the Gulf; West Africa; Southeast Pacific; Red Sea; Caribbean; East Africa; and the South Pacific. These treaties led to the development of Environmental Action Plans and then co-ordination to fight pollution, etc. In 1977 the North Sea ceased to be ‘high seas’ as far as fish and mineral exploitation were concerned, when the EC established zones laying claim to the continental shelf. A number of the regional seas, e.g. the North Sea, Japan’s Inland Sea, the Baltic and the Mediterranean have been the subject of convention or treaty agreements in addition to the efforts of the UNEP to try to control pollution more effectively. Meeting in Jamaica in 1982, the UN launched the Convention on the Law of the Sea (with agreements effective to 2500 m depth from the shore). Some developing countries are keen to see the oceans, like Antarctica, declared common heritage, rather than becoming de facto possessions of those countries with the wealth and technology to exploit the resources. extended state sovereignty over natural resources (especially apparent in respect to ocean territorial limits). There has been some progress, e.g.: the EU is developing a form of supranational legislation, and the UNEP argues that international law should deal with protecting the world’s life support systems. Download 6.45 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling