Ignoring and denying: Acting as though nothing is wrong and as though our face has
not been threated when it has might be one of the more common strategies we use. When we
make a mistake or
do something embarrassing, we might continue maintaining the same face. At
times when riding my bike through campus, I have taken a spill. Students in the area hurry over
and ask if I’m okay. I usually get up right away, say I’m alright and ride away almost as though
my spill was intentional (part of my acrobatic face). After a block or two I check
my injuries and
wince at my skinned hands, but I’ve protected my face of being a competent bike rider.
Similar to ignoring, we can also deny that a given failure that would cause us a loss of
face has occurred when challenged by someone else. When a failure is
pointed out that would
cause us to lose face, we might claim it wasn’t really a failure, or it wasn’t our failure. We might
simply deny we did something that causes us face loss (“I’m
not late,” or “I didn’t say I’d do the
dishes”) or we might indicate it wasn’t our fault and instead blame someone else (“I’m not late,
you’re early,” or “John said he’d
do the dishes last night, not me”).
Diminishing: Goffman sees a variety of ways in which people work to make the failure
less significant or insignificant. Among the ways the face threat can be diminished are by
claiming the face-threat or failure was: an
unintentional act, a meaningless event, a joke and not
to be taken seriously, not really him or herself when it happened (thus
not reflective of the
person’s claimed face), or unavoidable because of external circumstances (“Heavy traffic made
me late”). The use of these strategies can help restore face or at least reduce the level of face
loss.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: