Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by 
increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this 
would have little effect on public health and that other measures are 
required. 
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 
It is often argued that expanding the number of leisure amenities is the most 
appropriate way of boosting the health of the general public, while others feel 
that this is not a viable solution and believe other steps are needed. This essay 
will argue that sports complexes are not the best answer and education is a 
more suitable option. 
A greater availability of recreation facilities might help some become healthier 
but it is unlikely to have an effect on the unhealthy masses. Most health 
problems do not stem from a lack of opportunities, but from a lack of 
motivation. For example, Cambridge University found in a recent study that 
62% of men and women who paid for an annual gym membership failed to 
go entirely after just one month. 
A public awareness campaign about the dangers a sedentary lifestyle can have 
on one’s fitness would affect not only people’s well-being but also their 
understanding of the issue. This is because most men and women are unaware 
of the harm they are doing to themselves by not exercising regularly and warning 
them about the risk factors would have a motivating effect. For instance, the ‘Go 
walking’ campaign in Northern Ireland in 2006 led to obesity-related illnesses, 
like heart disease and stroke, falling by almost a quarter. 
In conclusion, although an increased availability of sports centres can 
influence the wellness of the public to a certain extent, it is only through 
education that the real benefits can be realised. 

---

12