Guide to spelling, punctuation and grammar

A
NALYSIS
Answer to question 1
The answer specifically deals with the intermediate conclusions drawn
and counter-assertions made in the given text and refers to the relevant
sections. The reasons for the intermediate conclusions are analysed and
specific examples given. The final conclusion that is drawn is identified
and the reasons for the conclusion. 
Answer to question 2
The flaws in the argument are stated as being lack of hard evidence and
empty assertions without back-up evidence. The counter-arguments are
characterised as prejudiced and using emotional language. It is pointed
out that there are many dissenting voices but only one scientist is
referred to. The analysis pinpoints the assumption that environmentalists
care more about trees than human beings. Overall, the judgement is
113
13 –S
AMPLE ESSAY
8:
WRITING IN RESPONSE TO A CRITICAL THINKING TASK

---

made that the piece is very partial and polemical rather than objective. 
Answer to question 3
Specific details of ecological disasters are given to assert that global
warming is a definite threat to the planet. An assertion is made about the
majority of scientific opinion backing that analysis. In addition, an
argument is made that almost all nations now acknowledge the danger,
although some of the larger nations are dragging their feet in doing
something about reducing emissions. Specific examples of the effect of
global warming are presented to back the argument that is being made.
U
SEFUL WORDS AND PHRASES FOR USE IN
C
RITICAL
T
HINKING TASKS
argument
drawing an
analogy
making an
assumption
bias
conclusion
conflict
consistency
context
corroboration
counter-
argument
credibility
criterion
data
definition
dilemma
evidence
expertise
hypothetical
inference
inconsistency
intermediate
conclusion
interpretation
irrelevant
judgement
language
neutrality
perception
principles
relevance
reputation
vested
114
H
OW TO WRITE ESSAYS

---