History or Immediacy?


Download 101.43 Kb.

Sana10.01.2019
Hajmi101.43 Kb.

5

Wang Anshi and the Origins of  

Modern Public Management in  

Song Dynasty China



Wolfgang Drechsler

History or Immediacy?

T

his paper deals with one of the key texts of Chinese public man-



agement, the great Song Dynasty statesman, philosopher and poet 

Wang Anshi’s Wan Van Shu, or ‘memorandum of a myriad words’, of 

1058 – a proposal to radically reform the Chinese civil service. While Wang 

has remained famous across a millennium, the explicitly public managerial 

dimension of his work has been neglected, especially as regards its standing 

as a ‘global classic’.

In this paper, after briefly putting the memorandum into context, I 

explain its proposals from today’s globalized Western public management 

perspective, rather than from an historical one. I treat the memorandum as 

an ancient text with contemporary relevance – surely the Confucian way, 

and one that also Wang Anshi employed. My aim is to show, without doing 

any injustice to the text, that Wang argues on a very high level even from 

the perspective of the 2013 public management discourse, by addressing 

both context-specific problems and perennial ones in public management. 

My approach here is based on Gadamer’s (1960) hermeneutics – the full 

reconstruction of the meaning of the original, or of the author’s intent, is 

impossible, even if such a meaning did exist. Almost ironically, we therefore 

can assume a possible immediacy of such fundamental, classical texts as the 



Source: Public Money & Management, 33(5) (2013): 353–360.

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   81

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM


82  History of Public Administration

present one, to the extent that we realize the context as much as is necessary 

to understand the text.

Current history of science theory has largely given up on tracing the 

history of success only, but it is highly difficult not to judge historical 

processes in light of one’s own current existence and therefore one’s views 

and those of one’s time. Keynes looked very different in 1988 from the way 

he does in 2013, and Marx as well. For this reason, relatively recent changes 

in the public management discourse have been very conducive to the study of 

Wang Anshi, because the end of the New Public Management (NPM) as the 

global theoretical paradigm (see Kattel and Drechsler, 2009) and the post-

NPM situation of ‘paradigmettes’ – such as the old NPM and a new one (a 

response to the global financial crisis), the old ‘Weberian’ state, New Public 

Governance and its various permutations, and especially the Neo-Weberian 

State (see Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2011) – may lead to an easier recognition of 

his qualities. Wang’s thoughts correspond to tenets of more than one of these 

‘paradigmettes’, but as precisely this amalgamation of views is the current state 

of the art of public management, we can see that his thoughts directly relate to 

a very immediate, contemporary set of insights, institutions and tools.

Wang Anshi and the Wan Yan Shu

Wang Anshi (1021–1086) was the leading statesman in the China of his 

time, and his time, the Song Dynasty (960–1279), is usually regarded as one 

of the great cultural periods of Chinese (see Williamson, 1937, p. 71) and – 

therefore, one might say – human civilization. If we follow Fukuyama (2011, 

p. 18), assuming that the modern state started in China and not in the ‘West’; 

and if this is a state understood to be very different from the Western one 

(Jacques, 2011), this is even more interesting:



China alone created a modern state in the terms defined by Max Weber. That 

is, China succeeded in developing a centralized, uniform system of bureau-

cratic administration that was capable of governing a huge population and 

territory. . .China had already invented a system of impersonal, merit-based 

bureaucratic recruitment that was far more systematic than Roman public 

administration (Fukuyama, 2011, p. 21).

And this state was enormously successful – so successful that it was not chal-

lenged until the early 19

th

 century as regards organization.



One would therefore expect the main administrative-theoretical work of 

a man like Wang Anshi to be of major importance, and so indeed it is. The 



Wan Yan Shu,  the ‘memorandum of a myriad [10,000] words’ (in reality, 

8567 according to Franke, 1932, p. 269; or 8565, according to Williamson, 

1935, p. 48), is a well-structured text, addressing the emperor of China, 

Renzong (1010–1063), not as a rhetorical device, but it was really written 

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   82

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  83

for and also read by him, even if he did not seem to have followed up on it 

(Franke, 1932, p. 275). It was also surely written with further distribution 

and perhaps even some historical dimension in mind – and it did form the 

basis for the far-reaching public management reforms its author was able to 

launch as the emperor’s chancellor (see Smith, 2009, pp. 360–361).

Since the book’s most controversial point was that it would break with a 

highly regarded tradition – that of basing civil service access on the knowl-

edge and handling of canonic texts, which was in the interest of the literati 

bureaucrats (Franke, 1932, p. 264; see generally Elman, 2000), the central 

device of that part of the text is the classical rhetorical one of many reforms, 

including the Reformation itself, to ‘purify’ the present from the aberrations 

of the recent past in order to restore the good old slate of earlier centuries 

(see Higashi, 1970, pp. 921, 935–937). As has often been observed, it is 

therefore irrelevant whether the past actually was as Wang tells it, because 

that is not the point (Mote, 1999, p. 139; on Wang’s sophisticated under-

standing and use of the classics, Bol, 1993, pp. 163–165).

Like his antagonists, including his nemesis, the conservative statesman 

and historian Sima Guang (1019–1086; see Bol, 1993), Wang was a (Neo-) 

Confucian as well, with a special liking for Mencius (Franke, 1932, p. 271; 

Higashi, 1970, p. 937); however, he was not an uncritical one. By now, many 

have come to recognize that it is wrong to say, as Fukuyama still does, that 

‘Confucianism is an intensely backward-looking doctrine that roots legiti-

macy in ancient practices’ (2011, p. 119; see rather Bell, 2010: especially pp. 

xiii–xv, xxvii, 148–162, from today’s perspective and Smith, 1993 for the his-

torical context), especially as Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism are again 

legitimized by the success of the (New) Confucian countries that employ 

it. Following Bell, we may indeed call Wang Anshi a ‘left Confucian’ (2010, 

p. xxix). Specifically, I would say that Wang wanted to make Confucianism 

work and therefore needed to make the Confucian scholar-bureaucrats work.

The memorandum made its author ‘famous for its powerful ideas and 

gained him a kind of leadership among reformers’ (Mote, 1999, p. 139). It 

formed the basis for Wang’s reforms, but even after those had been rescinded 

to a good extent, the memorandum remained a much-debated classic. (See 

the opinions in Meskill, 1963.

1

)

Wang’s polite yet still very candid point is to suggest that the emperor is 



willing but that his support is weak. The empire is badly administered and 

therefore soon existenially threatened. (Wang was proven correct, but was 

made a scapegoat for this himself; see Williamson, 1935: pp. vii–viii.) Yet 

the emperor cannot easily change the situation. Why? ‘My reason for saying 

that the realization of your object is impossible is that there is an insufficient 

number of capable men to help you. Without these it is not feasible to reform 

the government’ (WYS, pp. 50–51).

‘Producing’ good people is therefore the key to administrative reform – this 

is not about innate or cultivated virtue, or not only, but about the structures, 

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   83

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM


84  History of Public Administration

institutions and processes that will eventually produce these men (WYS, p. 51; 

see Liu, 1968, p. 47). In other words, Wang’s focus, quite in line with the clas-

sical development-policy concept of Nurkse (1952; 1964; see also Drechsler, 

2009), is clearly on administrative capacity, without which any further reform 

is impossible (see WYS, p. 52; Liu, 1968, p. 45).



The Text

Wang divides the pillars of a well-functioning civil service into four catego-

ries, which could be replicated today without any change:

 Training.



  ‘Nurturing’ meaning remuneration (Bol, 1993, p. 161). 

 Selection. 



  Appointment (WYS, p. 54).

These are first enumerated (WYS, p. 54), then briefly discussed (WYS, pp. 

54–60) and then dealt with in some detail (WYS, pp. 60–76). In other words, 

and this has rarely been recognized, the first short discussion forms an exec-

utive summary. In the following discussion, however, I have combined the 

respective arguments from both sections, as well as pertinent ones from the 

general parts.

Training

Key to the training of good civil servants is to have both high-quality instruc-

tors (a basic point of Wang) and a relevant curriculum (WYS, pp. 54–55). In 

this regard, Wang is famously opposed to the traditional curriculum, which 

in the end prevailed over the centuries, as the basis for the civil service exam-

ination, because it largely consisted of the formal discussion, recitation and 

interpretation of the great Confucian classics (WYS, p. 61; on the exam, see 

overall Elman, 2000; briefly still Miyazaki, 1976; and the case study of a 

much later cohort by Man-Cheong, 2004).

Actually, this system also had its very good sides, because it objectivized 

selection and hence was much better than nothing; it was a meritocratic test 

and thus potentially the only way to counteract the practice of corruption 

and nepotism which Wang decried (WYS, pp. 71–72), which has always been 

seen as a problem in China (until today) and which is, if one will, a side-

effect of strong family ties. As Fukuyama says, ‘the natural human propensity 

to favor family and friends . . . constantly reasserts itself in the absence of coun-

tervailing incentives’ (2011, p. 17). Overall, the story of the Chinese civil ser-

vice exam is a giant success story – ‘it is safe to say that the Chinese invented 

modern bureaucracy, that is, a permanent administrative cadre selected on 

the basis of ability rather than kinship or patrimonial connection’ (2011, 

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   84

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  85

p. 113). That objectification, any objectification, of selection would be the 

only possible path thither is as obvious as that the exceedingly strong Chinese 

notion of family might have actually been the reason for the emergence of 

such a model.

In addition, that the examination was done with the personal involve-

ment of the emperor himself, who personally graded the final top essays (see 

Miyazaki, 1976, pp. 81–83), unthinkable in the West, shows its centrality for 

the state system and the esteem in which the process, and thus civil service 

selection, was held. And, finally, if there had to be standard texts upon which 

to base the exam, the Neo-Confucian Four Books (see Gardner, 2007 for a 

handy selection) were not the worst choice. The potentially quite subversive 

nature of these texts – especially of Wang’s favourite, the Mencius – towards 

any oppressive, irresponsible regime, such as through the concept of the 

‘Mandate of Heaven’, is very clear even for the casual reader.

However, today, one would generally be more in sympathy with Wang, 

and the argument would be that while a standardized test of any sort is and 

was better than no test at all, a test or examination mechanism which would 

actually select the best candidates suited to the office (rather than to the 

studies, which generally is the case with academic admissions exams today) 

would be better still.

What is interesting here is that Wang takes one further step in his argu-

mentation – if I see it correctly, this point is made for the first time in what 

can be called testing theory. Not only is the test not beneficial, he claims, 

it actually is bad because it makes the cadres worse by preventing early 

specialization:

Not only does the present teaching fail to produce the type of man that is 

required, it actually ruins them so that they cannot become capable adminis-

trators. . .[In the olden days] each man. . .had the opportunity of specializing 

in his own line, and did not study anything extraneous to the actual task of 

preparation for a particular job (WYS, p. 61).

Subject-wise, Wang’s idea why there should not be generalists is the notion 

that people are suited to different tasks, and thus that they should fulfil 

exactly those (WYS, pp. 58–59). It is therefore important that, early on, pub-

lic management candidates focus on the policy field(s) in which they will 

later work – a point that has been emphasized by Pollitt (2005) and one 

that has classically been made for the current Western discourse by Mosher 

(1982). Meskill called it ‘commonplace today’: this was in 1963. Wang thus 

advocates early specialization, arguably because his focus is primarily on 

competence and only secondarily, if still very strongly, on the avoidance 

of corruption and imperial bureaucracy that come with a lack of rotation, 

which in turn requires generalists. Early specialization, never mind whether 

one agrees with it or not, also seems to be the current trajectory in public 

management (see Ingraham, 2007; also Peters, 2010).

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   85

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



86  History of Public Administration

Nurturing

Regarding nurturing, i.e. remuneration, Wang is a realist (to an extent which 

did not enter the Western discourse before Machiavelli almost half a millen-

nium later), stating that if civil servants are not adequately remunerated, 

they will become corrupt (WYS, p. 55; see Qi, 1979, pp. 102–103; Smith, 

2009, p. 359). It is from this perspective that he makes the ever-unpopular 

and almost always correct remark: ‘The rate of salaries paid nowadays is 

generally too low’ (WYS, p. 65). He mentions that highly dedicated civil serv-

ants will even work well without appropriate income and really bad ones not 

even with, but the normal, average person is motivated by money, or at least 

by an adequate salary, to perform well (WYS, p. 65). ‘What people want is 

a decent life, to earn a good reputation, gain a distinguished title, and get 

good pay’ (WYS, p. 79).

Wang is very thorough regarding this point, arguing in favour of bench-

marking with private sector incomes a civil servant would otherwise have. 

The concept for just salary is thus that of alimentation, i.e. the idea that civil 

servants receive ‘sufficient to make up for what they had lost in farming by 

being called upon for public work’ (WYS, p. 55). It is implicitly opposed, 

therefore, to performance pay, i.e. in the contemporary and post-NPM sense, 

Wang is arguing for civil servants to be paid well enough to live but moti-

vated by identification with the state. Wang’s concept is thus precisely that 

of the Economics Nobel Prize winner George A. Akerlof and his notion of 

‘motivational capital’ (Akerlof and Kranton, 2005). It is also fully in line with 

the recent public management discourse on public sector motivation and 

incentives (see Ingraham, 2007; Perry et al., 2010; Peters, 2010).

Wang matches this with spending control, i.e. outlawing excessive show-

off and luxury spending (WYS, p. 66) – as was common in the West for 

centuries as well but not an idea deemed possible today – on the one hand. 

On the other, heeding the context, and well aware of the rule of nepotism, 

Wang even allows salary continuity for children and grandchildren (WYS, p. 

55). Given the Chinese notion of family, this is of great importance. This is, 

of course, just like what is still done today in several modern systems in the 

form of continued pensions for widows and younger children if a civil serv-

ant dies (see Bossaert et al., 2001).

And to the common complaint that there is no money to pay the civil 

servants, one that was indeed leveled against him (see Kuhn, 2009, p. 56), 

and one that meets anyone arguing for adequate civil service remuneration 

today, Wang basically says that there is no alternative and that decent fiscal 

management produces enough resources to pay for a well-working civil ser-

vice. (WYS, pp. 67–68; see Smith, 1993, pp. 83–84). Wang was miscast as 

profit-seeking, as opposed to Confucian, by his antagonists (see Liu, 1968, p. 

50; Kuhn, 2009, p. 56), but his point was simply to have sufficient revenues 

in order to have a well-functioning state.

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   86

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  87

Selection

Candidates for civil service positions, according to Wang, should be nomi-

nated decentrally, i.e. locally and then checked and educated, after which 

there would be a trial or probationary period (WYS, p. 57). Today, we see a 

clear tendency in Western public management towards general decentraliza-

tion as well (Ingraham, 2007) – what is interesting here is that, for Wang, 

this decentralization is part and parcel of, and indeed strengthening if not 

making possible, the centralization of the overall system. In that sense, it is 

akin to the impetus of, for instance, the famous Steinian establishment of 

municipal autonomy in Prussia 200 years ago, still the most important concept 

of local autonomy, which was intended to make the nation work better (see 

Drechsler, 2008). Checking and also educating, again, is left to experienced 

senior civil servants, i.e. practitioners (WYS, p. 58) – something that was actu-

ally done in the system, including grading the exams (Miyazaki, 1976, p. 24). 

So there is an important snowball effect – once one has some good people as 

senior civil servants, they can and will select good people for lower or younger 

ranks as well (WYS, p. 70). This is an idea fully congruent with the con-

temporary discussion of public sector leaders as ‘stewards’ (see Denis et al., 

2007). On the other hand, bad people would produce more bad ones as well 

(WYS, p. 71). Due to the size of the Chinese empire, not everything could 

have been done by the emperor himself, and so it was important to delegate 

hiring to people who had shown themselves to be competent (WYS, p. 51).

Appointment

Finally, civil servants are assessed after an extended time period of at least 

three years, as too short a period makes no sense – something taken up in the 

problem of monitoring, performance pay, etc. today, which interferes with 

good public management. (See again Akerlof and Kranton, 2005; on the con-

ceptual problems with performance measurement see Van de Walle, 2009.) 

As this is a key insight, the argument, which still stands today, is cited in full:

. . .it is only after a prolonged period in any one appointment, allowing one’s 

superior sufficient time to learn of his real capacity and attainments, and 

for the people under him to become truly subservient and happy under his 

control, that the really worthy have the chance to display their worth, and 

on the other hand that the non-diligent civil servants may have their irre-

sponsibility exposed.

Hence, they made provision for a prolonged period of probation as the best 

method of testing the appointees. This being ensured, those of real character 

and ability realized that they would be afforded a full chance to carry their 

projects to a successful issue, and were not distressed by the prospect that 

possibly they could not carry out their ideas properly, or that they would be 

deprived of their just reward (WYS, p. 59).

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   87

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM


88  History of Public Administration

It ought to be generally a rule that appointments should be made for a long 

time, relatively longer periods being allowed to those who have control of 

greater areas, or particularly heavy responsibilities. Only in that case can 

a person be responsible and make some valuable contribution to the state 

(WYS, p. 75).

Whether this is something like the classic NPM performance contract with 

agency heads, typically for three to five years (see Hood, 1998), or in effect 

the opposite, would be a fascinating item for discussion.

The historical Chinese precept, which Wang cites approvingly, is in this 

regard to have an inspection every three years, and after three successful 

inspections, the candidate would perhaps receive something like tenure 

(WYS, p. 60) – very similar to, for instance, the Estonian academic tenure 

system today. This includes only sparing rotation, of course (WYS, p. 74), 

because, as has been mentioned previously, Wang wants to avoid generalism, 

which would lead to a lack of expertise and to the appointment of men to 

positions for which they would not be suited.

This system also includes the need for some trust in the civil servants, a post-

NPM notion today again emphasized especially by Halligan and Bouckaert 

(2009; Bouckaert, 2012), and not weighing them down with overregulating 

micro-management, basically the earliest charter of managerialism:

Another defect I must now stress is that after they are appointed to office, 

they are not trusted to carry out their duties. An official is hedged about 

by a multitude of minute prohibitions and hindrances, so that he simply 

cannot carry out any idea he may chance to have. . .It is equally futile to 

expect efficient government if, having the right men in their proper positions, 

you hedge them about by a multitude of minute and harassing prohibitions 

(WYS, p. 75).

Of course, the necessity for trust – necessary objectively because only 

time will tell and subjectively because it hinders and demotivates the compe-

tent civil servant – requires having the latter to begin with – and that in turn 

is accomplished by training and by the payment structure. Thus, promotion, 

too, should be by merit and not by seniority, and the fact that once the for-

mer happens, there are complaints among the literati civil servants shows, 

Wang says, how much the system has degenerated already (WYS, pp. 73–74; 

see Franke, 1932, p. 275).

Given that framework, Wang is strongly in favour of performance review. 

Civil servants should not only be dismissed, or at least not promoted, if they 

do something wrong, but also if they do not perform well enough (WYS, pp. 

75–76). This is something many would certainly call an NPM feature, and it 

is one if compared to classical ‘Weberian’ systems, but equally surely not to 

Weber at least as regards promotion (see Weber, 1922, pp. 124–130). This is 

also a concept that goes back to early modern Western public management in 

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   88

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM


Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  89

some of the earliest texts, such as Oldendorp’s Was billig und recht ist of 1529 

(1948, pp. 5–23), which also emphasizes that legality is not good enough for 

public management action but that benefit for the given entity of governance 

is. The key for all of them is, however, that civil servants have to have the 

space to do the things they are supposed to do, and well.

In Sum


Reverting again to the idealized historical precedent, Wang concludes:

So we see that due caution was paid to the selection of officials in those 

days, that they were given an appropriate position, that they were kept in 

office for a long-enough period, that they were regulated and rewarded in a 

most careful manner, and were given freedom and authority for the proper 

discharge of their duties (WYS, pp. 59–60).

But also:



If there is failure to secure the right method in regard to any one of these 

matters, viz., the instruction, selection, maintenance, and appointment of 

officials, it is sufficient to ruin the future of the country. What state of things 

can we expect if all four of these are present together? (WYS, p. 76; see also 

Bol, 1993, p. 162.)

How to get to the well-working, interconnected system, then? Only ‘by stra-

tegic planning and calculating on the basis of the data available, and taking 

actions gradually’ (WYS, p. 79) – by incremental change, that is – based on 

proper foresight (WYS, p. 77).

Wang saw that there would be problems with his reform plans, seeing as 

they went against powerful vested interests (WYS, pp. 80–82; see Meskill, 

1963, p. xii; Mote, 1999, pp. 141–142). But the same, as he says, was the 

case with Confucius himself (WYS, p. 81).



Wang Anshi’s Reforms

And indeed, Wang and his plans failed after the death of ‘his’ emperor and 

patron, Shenzong (1048–1085, ruled 1067–1085); as Franke claims (1932, 

p. 266), because he did not heed his own advice on the need for incrementalism. 

But of course, from a public management perspective, the point is that many 

of his reforms were actually implemented, and even by himself. This included:

•  The raising of salaries, especially for minor officials. 

•  The promotion only of the truly qualified and successful.

•  Some change to the civil service examination; and that of previous educa-

tion as well (Qi, 1979, pp. 102–112; see Elman, 2000, pp. 16–17).

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   89

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



90  History of Public Administration

Most reforms may have been rolled back later, but for anyone dealing with 

public management reform, to implement them for years or even decades 

is a huge accomplishment (see Meskill, 1963, pp. xi–xiv; Higashi, 1970, 

p. 955; Mote, 1999, p. 140; Hsiao quoted in Mote, 1999, pp. 143–144) This 

is important to underline because it is my impression from the discussions 

with Chinese scholars and senior civil servants (who all do know him) that 

he is still seen as a practical failure and thus not as someone one should take 

as a model for Chinese public management.

From the traditional Chinese Marxist perspective, Wang is seen, quite as 

would be expected, either as a reformer, but just a reformer – and therefore 

someone on the internally good but externally bad side of class struggle 

(Qi, 1979) – or even as someone who made the exploitation of peasants 

worse by stabilizing the system (Wang Zengyu, 1980, pp. 144–145). But, to 

argue with Franke, the motive for Wang Anshi’s reform proposals was not 

only the functioning state, but also that only a well-paid, well-motivated 

bureaucracy will not oppress and exploit the citizenry (1932, pp. 265–266; 

further, Liu, 1968, p. 46; Hsiao quoted in Mote, 1999, p. 144).

On the other hand, Wang has remained a household name, and a few years 

ago, according to China Daily, the then Prime Minister Wen Jiabao ‘cited Wang 

Anshi, the Song Dynasty (960–1279) literary master and reformer: A true 

reformer should fear neither heaven, nor convention nor gossip’ (Zhao, 2008).

Wang Anshi’s reform proposals are specific and concrete, and he realized 

they could only be implemented incrementally and together. And in a limited 

way, more than which he never claims, Wang’s system is self-perpetuating: 

good senior civil servants will indeed lead to more good ones, especially if 

closely engaged in the selection and education of new ones (see Cheung, 

2010, pp. 38–40).

Almost all of Wang’s proposals are extremely ‘modern’ and could be 

applied with a few adaptations today. Or vice versa – assuming that Wang’s 

diagnosis of problems was correct – his very concrete remedies would com-

pletely be in line with important strings of 21st-century public administra-

tion research:

•  Applied yet fundamental training.

• Specialization.

•  Adequate remuneration.

•  Corruption avoidance geared to the specific context. 

•  An evidence-based, careful and considered performance measurement 

system based on appropriate time and trust.

All this he proposes in full awareness of the interconnectedness of the sys-

tem’s elements and the necessity for incremental change. In the West, such 

public management discussions would have to wait another 500 years at 

least – partially almost another millennium.

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   90

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM


Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  91

Note

1.  For this essay, I have used as a basis Williamson’s standard translation (1935), abbrevi-



ated ‘WYS’, but I have edited this text based on the facsimile of the original given by 

Franke in his appendix (1932). I have added the reference to the facsimile after 

Williamson’s page number in cases of direct quotations. Franke uses the text from 

Wang’s collected works originally published in 1883, which in turn is based on a text 

from 1560, and that again on one from 1140 (Franke, 1932, p. 15). The (silent) 

edition of Williamson was made, while also consulting Franke’s nicely annotated 

translation (pp. 15–51), by Cong Yongqing with Aziz Klebleyev and myself.

References

Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2005), Identity and the economics of organizations. 

Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 1, pp. 9–32.

Bell, D. A. (2010), China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Soci-



ety (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

Bol, P. K. (1993), Government, society, and the state: on the political visions of Ssu-ma 

Kuang and Wang An-shih. In Hymes, R. P. and Schirokauer, C. (Eds), Ordering the 

World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China (University of California 

Press, Berkeley), pp. 131–154.

Bossaert, D. et al. (2001), Civil Services in the Europe of Fifteen (EIPA, Maastricht).

Bouckaert, G. (2012), Reforming for performance and trust: some reflections. The NISPAcee 



Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 5, 1, pp. 9–22.

Cheung, A. B. L. (2010), Checks and balances in China’s administrative traditions. In 

Painter, M. and Peters, B. G. (Eds), Tradition and Public Administration (Palgrave 

Macmillan, London), pp. 31–43.

Denis, J.-L. et al. (2007), Rethinking leadership in public organizations. In Ferlie, E. et al. 

(Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 

pp. 446–467.

Drechsler, W. (2008), Foundations of municipal autonomy: Karl Freiherr vom Stein at 250 

and the Preußische Städteordnung at 200. Heinz Duchhardt: Stein. Eine Biographie. 

The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1, 1, pp. 137–141.

Drechsler, W. (2009), Towards the law & economics of development: Ragnar Nurkse 

(1907–1959). European Journal of Law and Economics, 28, 1, pp. 19–37.

Elman, B. A. (2000), A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China 

(University of California Press, Berkeley).

Franke, O. (1932), Der Bericht Wang Ngan-schis von 1058 über Reform des Beamtentums. 

Ein Beitrag zur Beurteilung des Reformators. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akad-

emie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 1932 (issue XIII, 21 April) 

(Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin), pp. 264–312, i–x.

Fukuyama, F. (2011), The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French 

Revolution (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).

Gadamer, H.-G. (1960), Wahrheit und Methode (Mohr/Siebeck, Tübingen).

Gardner, D. K. (Ed) (2007), The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian 

Tradition (Hackett, Indianapolis).

Halligan, J. and Bouckaert, G. (2009), Performance and trust: developmental paths and 

optional directions. In Roness, P. G. and Sætren, H. (Eds), Change and Continuity in 

Public Sector Organizations. Essays in Honour of Per Lœgreid (Fagbokforlaget, Bergen), 

pp. 257–277.

Higashi, I. (1970), O Anseki shinpo no kenkyu [A study of Wang Anshi’s reforms] (Kazama 

shobo, Tokyo).

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   91

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



92  History of Public Administration

Hood, C. (1998), Individualized contracts for top civil servants. Governance, 11, pp. 443–

462.

Ingraham, P. (2007), Striving for balance: reforms in human resource management. In 



Ferlie, E. et al. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford University 

Press, Oxford), pp. 521–536.

Jacques, M. (2011), How China will change the way we think: the case of the state. Trans-

Atlantic Academy Paper Series (February).

Kattel, R. and Drechsler, W. (2009), Towards the Neo-Weberian State? Perhaps, but cer-

tainly adieu, NPM! The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1,  2, 

pp. 95–99.

Kuhn, D. (2009), The Age of Confucian Rule: The Song Transformation of China (Belknap/

Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

Liu, J. T. C. (1968), Reform in Sung China: Wang An-shih (1021–1086) and His New Policies 

(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

Man-Cheong, I. D. (2004), The Class of 1761. Examinations, State, and Elites in Eighteenth-

Century China (Stanford University Press, Stanford).

Meskill, J. (Ed) (1963), Wang An Shih: Practical Reformer? (Heath, Boston).

Miyazaki, I. (1976), China’s Examination Hell: The Civil Service Examinations of Imperial 

China (Yale University Press, New Haven).

Mosher, F. C. (1982), Democracy and the Public Service (Oxford University Press, New York).

Mote, F. W. (1999), Imperial China, 900–1800 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

Nurkse, R. (1952), Trade fluctuations and buffer policies of low-income countries. Kyklos, 



12, 3, pp. 141–154; Epilogue: pp. 244–265.

Nurkse, R. (1964), Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries (Basil Black-

well, Oxford).

Oldendorp, J. (1948 [1529]), Was billig und recht ist. In Was billig und recht ist (1529)/



Ratsmannenspiegel (1530) (Klostermann, Frankfurt/Main), pp. 5–23.

Perry, J. L. et al. (2010), Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years 

of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 10, 5, pp. 

681–690.


Peters, B. G. (2010), Recruiting public personnel. In The Politics of Bureaucracy (Routledge, 

London), pp. 81–123.

Pollitt, C. (2005), Performance management in practice: a comparative study of executive 

agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (June).

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, C. (2011), Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: 

New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian Stale (Oxford University 

Press, Oxford).

Qi Xia (1979), Wang An-shih pien-fa [The Wang Anshi reforms], (Shang-hai jen-min ch’u-

pan-she [Shanghai People’s Press], Shanghai).

Smith, P. J. (1993), State power and economic activism during the new policies, 1068–1085. 

In Hymes, R. P. and Schirokauer, C. (Eds), Ordering the World: Approaches to State and 



Society in Sung Dynasty China (University of California Press, Berkeley), pp. 76–127.

Smith, P. J. (2009), Shen-Tsung’s reign and the new policies of Wang An-Shih, 1067–

1085. In Twitchett. D. and Smith, P. J. (Eds), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 5, 

pt. 1: The Sung Dynasty and its Precursors, 907–1279 (Cambridge University Press, 

Cambridge), pp. 347–483.

Van de Walle, S. (2009), International comparisons of public sector performance: how to 

move ahead? Public Management Review, 11, 1, pp. 39–56.

Wang Anshi (1058), The Wan Yen Shu, or Memorial of a Myriad Words. Williamson, H. R. 

(trans.). In Williamson (1935), vol. 1, pp. 48–84. (WYS.)

Wang Zengyu [cited Wang Zengyu] (1980), Wang Anshi bianfa jianlun [A brief introduc-

tion to the reforms of Ang Anshi]. Zhongguo shehui kexue [Chinese Social Science], 3, 

pp. 131–154.

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   92

11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM



Drechsler 

l

 Origins of Modern Public Management  93

Weber, M. (1922), Grundrib der Sozialökonomie, Vol. 3: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Mohr/

Siebeck, Tübingen).

Williamson, H. R. (1935–1937), Wang An Shih – A Chinese Statesman and Educationalist of 

the Sung Dynasty. 2 vols (Probsthain, London).

Zhao Xu (2008), PM uses poetry, prose and passion to make point. China Daily (19 March). 

See http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2008npc/2008–03/19/content_6547197.htm

05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05.indd   93



11/12/2014   3:58:15 PM

Document Outline

  • 00-MW Peters & Pierre_01~FM
  • 01-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-01
  • 02-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-02
  • 03-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-03
  • 04-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-04
  • 05-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-05
  • 06-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-06
  • 07-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-07
  • 08-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-08
  • 09-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-09
  • 10-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-10
  • 11-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-11
  • 12-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-12
  • 13-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-13
  • 14-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-14
  • 15-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-15
  • 16-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-16
  • 17-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-17
  • 18-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-18
  • 19-MW Peters & Pierre~Ch-19


Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:


Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2017
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling