Ielts essays abazar alizadeh
19- In the fight against crime, police forces and governments are
Download 2.6 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
jump ielts
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Essay Practice
41
19- In the fight against crime, police forces and governments are increasingly using security cameras in public places. Some people are opposed to this, saying that it invades our privacy. Discuss both these views and finally give your opinion. Security cameras have become ubiquitous in many countries. Whereas before they appeared only in banks and at high-security areas, they are now entering public places such as malls, streets, stadiums and transport. Many people feel they intrude on citizens’ privacy while others believe they may help increase social security. Some people believe security cameras are far from being a perfect solution. The biggest objection they can lodge concerns privacy. Many people feel that they should be free to travel or move around a shop, mall, street or country without being photographed or recorded. They feel that being watched constantly is like being in a jail, and that ordinary people are losing their freedom because of these security devices. Another point is that although the police say that only criminals have something to fear from the cameras, many people do not trust governments with too much information. Corrupt authorities could use the information in the wrong way or twist it to victimize some groups, and finally I think cameras and computers can make mistakes. However, others believe that surveillance cameras have several benefits. An obvious benefit is that the police can catch criminals in the act, and reduce crime. This will make the streets safer for ordinary people. Catching a criminal red handed will also greatly reduce the police costs as the police do not need to conduct large scale investigation to prove a criminal guilty. A more important point is that criminals, particularly young offenders or petty criminals will be deterred. They will not be tempted to carry out crimes, and thus society will be a lot safer. Cameras are also cost-effective and unobtrusive. Authorities do not need to spend large amounts of money on police. In conclusion, although there are definite disadvantages to using surveillance devices such as cameras, but considering the rapidly increasing crime rate in our society and the critical need for enhancing our social security, I think the merits way outweigh its demerits. (327 words) Essay Practice Some people believe citizens should be allowed to carry handguns in order to protect themselves, while others think this can lead to many social security problems in the society. What’s your opinion? Use specific reasons to support your answer. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling