Interpretation of literary
Parts of the text containing the author's digressions also play an
Download 5.01 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
interpretation of literary text
Parts of the text containing the author's digressions also play an important role in disclosing the conceptual information. The author's discourses usually take the form of deep philosophic generalizations, conclusions, judgments and individual epigrams. The author's reasonings very distinctly show his position, his social, political and aesthetic credo. It is just the author's reasonings that very frankly express his ideologic and aesthetic point of view, his personal evaluation of depicted things. Thus, the author's discourses arc characterized by an extraordinary functional load, performing the role of principal turning points in a literary production, most ponderous in ideological and artistic respects. The enumerated forms of context-variative segmentation- narration, description, discourse — constitute the plan of the author's speech. The speech of the personages is represented in the text by the forms of dialogues, monologues and represented speech. Dialogue of a literary work is a complex and polyfunctional formation. Being an analogue of oral speech, it, on one side, reflects the regularities intrinsic to oral intercourse and on the other side it immediately expresses individual peculiarities of a speaker and characterizes his life standing, ideologic, aesthetic and social status'. The dialogic context is a portrayal of personages: ilreveals their speech peculiarities, discloses their world outlook and clearly shows their emotional, ethic and moral traits. Let's again it-urn to the analysis of the 42 extract from J.Galsworthy's novel "The Man of Property". As it has been stated above, the disposition of the given episode at the beginning of the new chapter, the rupture in the nutritional chain signalizes the significance of this text span in revealing the conceptual informatio n. The extract begins with narration. The very first sentence indicates implied importance of the described event. The word "Dinner" is emphasized graphically. The sentence is isolated into a separate paragraph. The pause following the paragraph makes it possible to comprehend the utterance, to imagine the solemn ceremony of the dinner. In subsequent sentences our attention is attracted by the repetition of the word — "in silence", given in the function of anadiplosis and placed in the initial, the most prominent, position of the sentence. In this way the word becomes stylistically marked and makes the utterance emotionally-coloured. Thanks to this we feel the tense atmosphere, the excitement of the people at the dinner table. Analyzing direct speech of the personages, we draw deductions about their emotional state. Irene and Bo sinney arc excited, show interest in each other, perceptive to the beauty of the awakening nature. Their speech contains exclamatory sentences, words of positive emotional evaluation. It is interesting to mark that although the conversation at the table is general, Irene's and Bosinney's talk is addressed only to each other. Their cues, like an echo, always follow each other: "Bosinney ventured: it's the first spring day! Irene echoed softly: Yes, the first spring day!" The reader feels the personal interest Irene and Bossinney have for each other, the source of their love, when every word becomes significant, when words of one person find response in the heart of the other. June's speech reflects a quite contrary emotional state-She denies everything that Irene and Bossinney say. She doesn't like spring: "there isn't a breath of air", the scent of flowers: "How can you like the scent? » the sunset "A London sunset!" June's words contain negative emotional evaluation: "Wine's such horrid •stuff!" Thus June's speech reflects her inner state —she is out of spirits, she is irritated and angry. She is jealous, feeling Irene's and Bossinney's mutual attraction, she cannot conceal her bad mood. Soames, in contradistinction to the three outliners, is quite calm and unaware of their feelings. His speech characterizes him as a neutral man, entirely indifferent to everything that doesn't immediately concern his own interests. For Soames this dinner is only an occasion for establishing business contacts with Bossinncy. He is concerned only 43 with the dinner-itself. Against the background of the general emotional tension Soames cues about cutlets, wine, olives cause nothing but an ironical smile on the part of the reader. Thus, dialogue supplies material for characterization of the personages and in this way plays an important role in revealing the .general conceptual information of the- text. It is necessary to remark that the analysed speech forms are seldom used in their pure state. They are usually mixed up or combined with one another. There arc different ways of joining them: either one form is interspersed with elements of the other, or one form intrudes in big portions into the other, or several forms are mixed up together. Replenishing each other they blend so organically that sometimes it is difficult to disjoin them. And yet they present different kinds of information dynamic (action, movement, communication) and static (the description of an object and its environment). Download 5.01 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2025
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling