eHealth: from promise to sustainability eHealth – sharing of experiences and lessons learned EHR in Austria – regional and nationwide
Overview: points to be addressed; Introduction: personal and organisational information; Background: region, programme or project to be presented; Major issues: lessons learned, requirements and future outlook; Conclusions: final remarks.
Points to be addressed Lower Austria: Local EHR project Nömed WAN Austria: National EHR program ELGA
Overview: points to be addressed; Overview: points to be addressed; Introduction: personal and organisational information; Background: region, programme or project to be presented; Major issues: lessons learned, requirements and future outlook; Conclusions: final remarks.
Task Force Electronic Health Record Decision of Federal Health Commission (BGK) from July 2006 concerning establishment of Arge ELGA and financial remuneration - Federal Government
- Federal states / Provinces and
- Social Insurance Institutions
Since September 2006 ARGE ELGA is acting operationally
Federal Health Commission (BGK –Bundesgesundheitskommission) Consists of 27 members - 7 Federal Government,
- 9 for provinces (1 for each federal state),
- 6 Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions,
- 1 representing cities and
- 1 representing communities,
- 1 bishops’ conference together with the Protestant’s,
- 1 patients’ ombud,
- 1 General Medical Council of Austria
Chair: Minister of Health, Family and Youth
Overview: points to be addressed; Overview: points to be addressed; Introduction: personal and organisational information; Background: region, programme or project to be presented; Major issues: lessons learned, requirements and future outlook; Conclusions: final remarks.
ELGA the EHR-Solution in Austria
Definition of ELGA ELGA contains relevant multimedia-based and health related data and information referring to a precisely identified person. Data und information originate from - different health service providers (HSP) and
- from the patient himself/herself
and are stored in one or several different information systems (virtual health record). Data are available independently of place and time (cost-saving) at the place of treatment for all authorized persons according to the tasks and needs of these persons and in compliance with data protection rules.
ELGA Steps of progress ELGA Feasibility Study 2006 Architectureplan, 1th Phase of Implementation Masterplan BGK Decision 04 05 2007 - Architecture
- Standards
- Detailed planning projects
2008 Cost-Benefit Study BGK Decision Autumn 2008
ELGA-Architecture
Overview: points to be addressed; Overview: points to be addressed; Introduction: personal and organisational information; Background: region, programme or project to be presented; Major issues: lessons learned, requirements and future outlook; Conclusions: final remarks.
Requirements Technical (syntactical) interoperability Content wise (semantical) interoperability Requirement: - Standards raise quality and reduce costs!
- Standards promote competition!
“Legal interoperability??” “Financial interoperability??”
Why Standards ?
Request HSP authorization Request HSP authorization Request patient identifikation Request insurance status Request patient consent Search med. documents Access / download med. documents
Austria & epSOS European Patients Smart Open Services – Open eHealth Initiative for a European Large Scale Pilot of Patient Summary and Electronic Prescription Arge ELGA is Austrian‘s national Competence Center, Austria is the leader in the Working Package 3.6 Identity Management ELGA Connex - e-Prescription (ELGA-eMedication)
- Patient Summary (~ELGA-Discharge summary)
Overview: points to be addressed; Overview: points to be addressed; Introduction: personal and organisational information; Background: region, programme or project to be presented; Major issues: lessons learned, requirements and future outlook; Conclusions: final remarks.
Key success factors Patients are in the Center Involvement of all Health Service Providers and Stakeholders in planning and implementation phase Considerations concerning the federated healthcare structures in Austria
Recommendations Recommend a step by step migration from existing, proprietary local systems to a compatible distributed and shared eHealth infrastructure Require the separation between - IT-Infrastructure
- Applications
- Data
Recommendations Don‘t think about „point to point communication“ n*(n-1)/2 27 EU-Members 351 Interfaces Don‘t reinvent the wheel Look for best practices Think big and global, act small and local
Thank you for your Attention! Thank you for your Attention!
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |