Lawrence Kasdan
William Hurt (Macon Leary) Kathleen Turner (Sarah Leary) Geena Davis (Muriel Pritchett)
Macon Leary
Sarah Leary
Muriel Pritchett
Melodrama (Lopez) Sides are clearly divided and defined. Heroes and villains are clearly divided and defined. The struggle between good and evil ends with the victory of good. Human psychology and motivation are presented in a simple way. Plots are often artificial and perhaps even clearly impossible. The purpose of the film is to arouse an emotional response.
AT as Melodrama How does the film differ from other melodramas you have seen? How might the film age? For instance, what elements of The Accidental Tourist might become ridiculous in the future?
Opening Segment The credits are run with a voice over and scenes of a man packing. How does this segment function as a metaphor? What different (metaphorical) directions does it take? Note how it is juxtaposed with humor. segment: 0.40-2.40/2.40-4.30
Macon and Sarah How do Hurt’s and Turner’s characters differ? How is the idea of travel employed as escape, and again, as metaphor for the divisions between characters (or more generally, people)? segment: 4.30-8.30
London segment: 14.50-16.40 What do we learn from this? Origins: 30.30-31.10 The unexpected: 40.10-40.40 Baggage: 1:13.20-1:14.15
Muriel’s Role What does Muriel’s role represent? Why is she interested in an asshole like Macon? segment: 54.10-1:00
Challenges to Roles? In some respects stereotypes seem to be reversed—for instance, women are more assertive in some ways: Turner demands a divorce and Davis pursues Hurt, and Hurt’s character is emotional and dependent.
Conventional Roles A lot of conventional gender roles are shown: Davis’ “mothering” of Hurt, the situation in Hurt’s family between his brothers and sister, Julian’s courtship of Rose. Are the traditional roles being criticized or satirized? segment: 1:50.45-1:54.00
Comic Elements Why does Kasdan put comic elements in? How do they function in the overall development of the film? segment: 30.10-, 41,50-
Edward The dog, Edward, is an important though complex character in this film. What symbolic meanings might he bear? What explains his violence? And towards whom?
Overview of Course Venice: Goethe, Dickens, James South America: Darwin, Guevara Emic/Etic: Geertz, Harris Africa: Kinglake, Haggard China: Maugham, Hilton Fantasy/Imagination: Wells, Kasdan
Travel Problem We are now in a position to revisit the questions that we began with to see whether new answers have appeared.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |