networks, planning zones, and states, and at the boundaries of branch interests
(drinking water supply, irrigation,
power engineering, industry, and the environment),
with managerial variable elements such as “water,” “salt,” and “energy.” The set
should allow us to make water–salt balance, power,
and economic calculations
(effects, damages, and compensation), assess electric energy flows and fuel delivery
49
between the states, make effective decisions
on water resources management, and
predict conflict situations and interstate agreement violations among the states.
plan
one
8
9
7
5
3
4
2
6
1
Social-
economic
model модель
Hydrological
model of
prospective
management
Level of annual
management
Level of
prospective
planning
Water-Economic Units
States,
river
basins,
region as
a whole
Power model
Hydrological
model of annual
management
Model of
ning z
Multiyear river
flow regulation
model
Figure A.1. Management levels and logical links within a set of models
Note. Logical links between the models on the scheme are:
1. Regional hydrological indicators of sustainable development and indicators of ecological
consequences of water resources management.
2.
Agricultural
production, economy, social-demographic indicators, investments.
3.
Power engineering (requirements, production, impacts, damages, compensations).
4, 5. Diversion from transboundary rivers, return flow, diverted water productivity.
6.
Available
water resources, diversion from rivers, water reservoirs and power plants operation
mode.
7, 8.
Power plant modes
9.
Restrictions on water reservoir filling to the end of year (season).
NOTES
1. Kyrgyzenergo has now been restructured as separate power production, power
transferring, and power distributing bodies.
2. This view was expressed in a survey of more than 250 participants
in multi-stakeholder
workshops and training in the ICWC Training Center.
Index entries: Aral Sea, transboundary rivers, water conflicts, interstate cooperation
50