Methodology course paper on the theme
The ways of developing skills for oral presentation group discussion
Download 320.03 Kb.
|
DIYORA
The ways of developing skills for oral presentation group discussion
The audience determines the credibility of the information and arguments presented. It helps people increase their self-worth and confidence while enhancing their public speaking abilities. Also, the argument is guided by predetermined rules that are decided upon at the beginning. One side is winning, while the other is losing because it is being assessed. The team that favors the idea, or the positive team, starts things off. Then comes the team that is against it, and so on. Each unit has an equal opportunity to counter the opponent's case in this manner. During a debate, each speaker is allotted a specific length of time to deliver their arguments and respond to the points the opposing team makes. So, there is a warning bell to give them time to finish and then a closing bell. Group discussions are a comprehensive approach to evaluating a person's suitability for a position, admittance, or other circumstances. The goal is to clarify the participants' points of view. It examines a person's personality, including ideas, opinions, behavior, emotional intelligence, viewpoint, etc. This method presents a topic to the participants for discussion, and information and opinions are exchanged systematically. The candidates are seated such that their backs are to one another. A panel of judges evaluates the competitors based on their leadership, communication, social abilities, and intelligence. In the academic, professional, and administrative fields, debate and group discussion are crucial for evaluating a person's communication abilities. Both group discussion and debate involve exchange of information between individuals regarding a certain topic. They aim to produce a healthy discussion and impart essential facts and opinions. However, the former has a more amiable nature as there are less stringent rules on timeframe and mode of speaking.15 Based on its etymology which is “discussus”, group discussants often “break up” a topic to examine various perspectives. In this sense, a group discussion is a friendly exchange of ideas which give more light to the subject matter. The participants are free to express their opinions and aptly rationalize their view points as the main goal of the group is to have a clearer understanding of the selected issue. The word “debate” came from the Latin prefix, “dis-“, which expresses “reversal” and “battere” which means “to fight”. Correspondingly, a debate is an argumentation between two groups or individuals. It is usually a formal competition which showcases the extent of knowledge and reasoning skills of the opposing sides. The debaters have to take turns in countering the other team’s stated key points. Thus, participants have to be keen in spotting flaws in the other side’s arguments. There are two to three members from each side. The first affirmative speaker, who will be questioned by the first negative speaker, opens with their entire case. This is followed by the presentation of the entire negative case by second negative speaker who will, in turn, be questioned by the first or second affirmative speaker.16 The main goal of a group discussion is to have a clearer understanding of the chosen topic. On the other hand, a debate is conducted to verify if a certain standpoint is more credible than its opposite. Unlike debates, group discussions are less formal as they do not have strict rules on topic coverage, time, taking turns, mode of speaking, and others. The contradicting positions are evidently stated in the beginning of a debate whereas two opposing opinions are not needed for a group discussion to commence. In a debate, there is a winner and a loser though there are times when the results can be a draw. As for group discussions, the participants are not competing with each other so they do not need to worry about gaining points. Debaters have an audience who listen to the pros and cons of an issue. The listeners have a more passive role as they cannot take part in the argument. On the other hand, group discussants may or may not have an audience and if they would have listeners, some types of discussions welcome input from them. Participants in a debate need to properly take turns in airing out ideas. Conversely, those in a group discussion do not have rules on taking turns. There is less cooperation involved in debates as the opposing sides need to attack or defend opinions. Thus, aggressive speech may sometimes be manifested. On the contrary, group discussions are often more cooperative as they are meant to achieve a more comprehensive and accurate view of a topic. A debate is largely more complex as more preparation, details, and roles are involved. As for a group discussion, this may be done more spontaneously with less guidelines and keypersons. Debaters need to persuade the listeners to take their side while group discussants simply aim to share information. Debates end with a specific conclusion which denotes the winning side whereas group discussions may not have a specific conclusion as there is no winner nor loser at the end. Download 320.03 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling