40-49%
Entry 2
|
You argue adequately based on sources. You weigh all important evidence offered with limited criticality. You reach a satisfactory judgement on the presented issue.
|
You express a personal rationalized position or stance about the presented issue adequately. You demonstrate a satisfactory possession of citizenship values. You attempted to connect and extend knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from your academic life/study to civic engagement by suggesting adequate actions to be taken regarding the chosen issue.
|
30-39%
Entry 1
|
You identify the issue and explain it poorly. You make limited connections to the local and global contexts and fail to justify the relation.
|
You demonstrate a poor awareness of global and local issues. You poorly show an open- and fair- minded attitude towards different viewpoints.
|
You demonstrate poor academic integrity skills (e.g., plagiarized most of the material). You demonstrate a limited critical approach in incorporating and referencing sources in a reference list with multiple inaccuracies.
You presented your video with no clarity and cohesion. Significant parts of the video are not comprehensible (either due to poor audio or video). Almost all the requirements have been ignored.
|
30-39%
Entry 2
|
You argue poorly and do not base on sources. You weigh all important evidence offered with limited criticality. You reach a poor judgement on the presented issue.
|
You express a personal rationalized position or stance about the presented issue unclearly. You demonstrate a poor possession of citizenship values. You poorly connect and extend knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from your academic life/study to civic engagement by suggesting impractical actions to be taken regarding the chosen issue.
|
|
