Operative dentistry aje qualtrough, jd satterthwaite la morrow, pa brunton

REFERENCES
1.
Jagger D.C. and Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear
effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil, 1995;
22
: 275–81.
2.
Odman P. and Andersson B. Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to
10.5 years: a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont, 2001; 14: 504–9.
3.
Fischer H., Weber M. and Marx R. Lifetime prediction of all-ceramic
bridges by computational methods. J Dent Res, 2003; 82: 238–42.
4.
Langeland K. and Langeland L.K. Pulp reactions to crown preparation,
impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. 
J Prosthet Dent, 1965; 15: 129–43.
POOC06 02/18/2005 04:36PM Page 150

---

Indirect restorations – further considerations


151
5.
Fleisch L., Cleaton-Jones P., Forbes M., van Wyk J. and Fat C. Pulpal
response to a bis-acryl-plastic (Protemp) temporary crown and bridge
material. J Oral Pathol, 1984; 13: 622–31.
6.
Driscoll C.F., Woolsey G. and Ferguson W.M. Comparison of exothermic
release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim
restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 1991; 65: 504–6.
7.
DeWald J.P., Moody C.R. and Ferracane J.L. Softening of composite resin
by moisture and cements. Quintessence Int, 1988; 19: 619–21.
8.
Millstein P.L. and Nathanson D. Effects of temporary cementation on
permanent cement retention to composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent,
1992; 67: 856–9.
9.
Peutzfeldt A. and Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing tempor-
ary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci, 1999;
107
: 65–9.
10.
Ganss C. and Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements
on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent, 1998; 23: 55–62.
11.
Silness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges. 
J Periodontal Res, 1970; 5: 60–8.
12.
Padbury A., Jr, Eber R. and Wang H.L. Interactions between the gingiva
and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol, 2003; 30: 379–85.
13.
Ferrari M., Cagidiaco M.C. and Ercoli C. Tissue management with a new
gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report. J Prosthet Dent,
1996; 75: 242–7.
14.
Shannon A. Expanded clinical uses of a novel tissue-retraction material.
Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2002; 23: 3–6.
15.
Loe H. and Silness J. Tissue reactions to string packs used in fixed
restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 1963; 13: 318–23.
16.
Kopac I., Sterle M. and Marion L. Electron microscopic analysis of 
the effects of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes. 
J Prosthet Dent, 2002; 87: 51–6.
17.
Spangberg L.S., Hellden L., Robertson P.B. and Levy B.M. Pulpal effects
of electrosurgery involving based and unbased cervical amalgam
restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1982; 54: 678–85.
18.
Eder A. and Wickens J. Surface treatment of gold alloys for resin 
adhesion. Quintessence Int, 1996; 27: 35–40.
19.
Djemal S., Setchell D., King P. and Wickens J. Long-term survival 
characteristics of 832 resin-retained bridges and splints provided in a
post-graduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993. J Oral Rehabil,
1999; 26: 302–20.
20.
Silness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges.
2. The influence of full and partial crowns on plaque accumulation,
development of gingivitis and pocket formation. J Periodontal Res, 1970;