Operative dentistry aje qualtrough, jd satterthwaite la morrow, pa brunton
SUPPLEMENTARY RETENTION FOR DIRECT RESTORATIONS
Download 0.95 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Principles of Operative Dentistry.compressed
SUPPLEMENTARY RETENTION FOR DIRECT RESTORATIONS
Retention is the ability of a restoration to resist forces that would dislodge it in the long axis of the tooth. Resistance of a restoration is the ability of a restoration to resist forces that would dislodge it in a lateral or rotational direction. In general terms, features of a prepara- tion that provide resistance form will also provide some degree of retention, and the two terms are often interchanged. Retention of a restoration within the tooth relies primarily on there being sufficient coronal tooth tissue which can provide: • Adequate bulk of dentine to form an undercut preparation or allow for placement of undercuts without resulting in weakened tooth structure. • Sufficient coronal tooth tissue to provide ‘bracing’ to lateral forces and hence provide some resistance to displacement of the restoration. Often with extensively broken down teeth it is impossible to develop appropriate retention and resistance form with the remaining tooth Principles of direct intervention 43 POOC02 02/18/2005 04:33PM Page 43 tissues and alternative methods to retain the restoration must be considered. A variety of techniques may be employed (perhaps in combination) to provide the extra retention. Bonding The principle of acid etching of enamel and the use of resin-based adhesives with resin composite materials is well established and the continuing development of multi-purpose bonding systems has allowed such materials to be bonded to tooth structure in a broad range of situations without the need to sacrifice healthy tooth struc- ture in order to increase retention and resistance. A more difficult situation arises when the material being used does not bond to tooth structure. Retention is normally provided by undercuts and prepara- tion features; however at times it may not be possible to create these features. This is classically the case with amalgam restorations in large preparations. With any operative procedure, there is a fundamental need to preserve tooth structure wherever possible and this equally applies to situations in which additional retention is required. In this respect, the ability to achieve additional retention through bonding restorative materials to tooth structure (and rely less on mechanical means of resistance) offers obvious advantages. A variety of propriety adhesives that are specifically for use in bonding amalgam to tooth structure are now available 27 . These are principally bi-functional polymeric resins, for example phosphonated esters of bis-GMA, 4-META and HEMA. Most of these adhesives bond to enamel and dentine in a similar way to resin composite bond- ing systems, though the bond between amalgam and adhesive is thought to be purely micromechanical 28 . Numerous in vitro studies related to bonded amalgam restorations have been reported in the literature. Despite there being few long-term clinical studies, there are definite short-term advantages, including: preservation of tooth structure, decreased immediate postoperative sensitivity, increased retention and increased fracture resistance of remaining tooth structure 29–31 . The long-term benefits are, however, less certain, reflecting uncertainty regarding the durability of the resin bond. In addition it should not be forgotten that bonding an amalgam restoration requires a well-controlled operating field and may be more time consuming. When the short-term benefits of bonding amalgam restorations are of use, for example to reinforce weakened cusps before providing a cuspal coverage restoration (large cores, or endodontically treated 44 Chapter 2 POOC02 02/18/2005 04:33PM Page 44 teeth), there seems little excuse for not adopting such a procedure. The long-term benefit of bonding amalgam restorations is uncertain. Therefore, given the lack of long-term clinical data, increased cost and technique sensitivity, the use of adhesive liners under amalgam restorations cannot yet be advocated as a routine procedure. Download 0.95 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling