112
According to Table 4.21, the low-achievers in the experimental group scored
slightly lower than those in the
control group on the pre-test, with the mean difference
of -0.21, and the p-value of .67. But the low-achievers in the experimental group
scored significantly higher than those in the control group (p= .00) on the post-test.
In
other words, both the high- and low-achievers’ oral proficiency in the experimental
group improved significantly after the intervention of cooperative learning, while
those in the experimental group remained almost the same.
In addition to comparing the average scores of the
oral task between the two
groups, the Paired Samples Test was computed to examine the intra-group
improvement on each of the five grading items. As shown in Table 4.22, the
high-achievers in the experimental group gained significantly (p < .00) in the post-test
oral task on all of the five items of the grading criteria. In other words, the
high-achievers made statistically significant improvement
on the appropriateness,
vocabulary, grammar,
intelligibility, and fluency.
Table 4.22 Paired Samples Statistics of High Achievers in Experimental Group
N=12
Pre
Post
M
SD
t
p
Appropriateness 13.66
16.83
3.16
.93
11.70
.00**
Vocabulary
14.66
18.00
3.33
2.67
4.31
.00**
Grammar
12.83
17.66
4.83
2.12
7.88
.00**
Intelligibility
13.16
16.83
3.66
1.15
11.00
.00**
Fluency
14.50
16.50
2.00
1.90
3.63
.00**
As
a sharp contrast, the high achievers in the control group gained significantly
only on the item of grammar, as shown in Table 4.23. The score
of the pre-test was
13.00 and that of the post-test was 15.33. The p-value was .00. However, the other
four items, i.e., appropriateness, vocabulary, intelligibility, and fluency, did not show
any sign of significant improvement on the post-test.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: