Smile on the phone

1.Buyer's rights questions
1.Who is the buyer?
2. Who is the customer?
3.Does the client always speak correctly?
4.Does the client always speak correctly?
2.Questions about the buyer
1.How should the buyer be?
2.Will there be a good deal?
3.should he be able to sell the goods?
Vokabulery

Customer	Mijoz
Buyer	Hairdo
Trade	Savdo
Income	Daromad
The goal	Maqsad
Success	muoffaqqiyat
Tax	Soliq
treatment	muomala
commodity	Tovar
shop	Magazine

4. Strong competition
1. What is competition?
2. What are the forms of competition?
3. What should be paid attention to in the competition?
4. free competition?
5. About technology in the market?
1. the place of demand in the market?
2. Why did Apple produce new smartphones?
3. If there is no technology period, the state of the market?


Different destinations- defferent customs
Secularism is the principle of seeking to conduct human affairs based on naturalistic considerations, uninvolved with religion.
Secularism is most commonly defined as the separation of religion from civil affairs and the state, and may be broadened to a similar position seeking to remove or to minimize the role of religion in any public sphere.^[1] The term "secularism" has a broad range of meanings, and in the most schematic, may encapsulate any stance that promotes the secular in any given context.^[2][3] It may connote anti-clericalism, atheism, naturalism, non-sectarianism, neutrality on topics of religion, or the complete removal of religious symbols from public institutions.As a philosophy, secularism seeks to interpret life based on principles derived solely from the material world, without recourse to religion. It shifts the focus from religion towards "temporal" and material concerns. There are distinct traditions of secularism in the West, like the French, Benelux-German, Turkish, and American models, and beyond, as in India,^[4] where the emphasis is more on equality before law and state neutrality rather than blanket separation. The purposes and arguments in support of secularism vary widely, ranging from assertions that it is a crucial element of modernization, or that religion and traditional values are backward and divisive, to the claim that it is the only guarantor of free religious exercise.Secularism takes different forms with varying stances on where and how religion should be separate from other aspects of society.^[6] People of any religious denomination can support a secular society, but the adoption of secularism as an identity is typically associated with non-religious individuals, including atheists.^[7] Political secularism encompasses the schools of thought in secularism that consider the regulation of religion by a secular state.^[8] Religious minorities and non-religious citizens in a country tend to support political secularism while members of the majority religion tend to oppose it.^[9] Secular nationalists are people that support political secularism within their own state.^[10]
Scholars identify several variations of political secularism in society. The strictest form, associated with the French laique model, advocates a state that is both firmly and officially distanced all religions and non-religious philosophical convictions in all of its manifestations and official dealings, without exception. A more "humanistic" form is indifferent towards religions per se but also advocates for the states to operate on purely a rational basis of evidence-based policy and a focus on human needs and welfare, entailing non-discrimination between peoples of differing religions and non-religious philosophical convictions throughout society A third "liberal" or "pillarized" form of secularism holds that governments may in some instances express sympathy to, provide funding to, license state services to, or otherwise allow unique special treatment of religions (common in German-speaking and Benelux secular states), so long as states nevertheless treat these convictions equally, and are neither hostile nor preferential towards any particular set of religious and those of non-religious philosophical convictions such as humanists.^[12] In these countries, secular humanist organisations typically receive state funding according to the same funding formulas used to provide state funding to religious groups.^[13] In Indian political discourse, the pejorative term pseudo-secularism is also used to highlight instances where it is believed that while the state purports to be secular, indifferent, or impartial towards religions, its policies in reality favor a particular religion over others.