The Art of Learning: An Inner Journey to Optimal Performance
part of our lives. We would be fools to deny such a rich element of the human
Download 7.86 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
part of our lives. We would be fools to deny such a rich element of the human experience. But, when our emotions overwhelm us, we can get sloppy. If fear reduces us to tears, we might not act effectively in a genuinely dangerous situation. If we seethe when someone crosses us, we may make decisions we come to regret. If we get giddy when things are looking up, we will probably make some careless mistakes that turn our good situation upside down. Competitors have different ways of approaching their emotions in the heat of battle. Many either feel that their natural movements are irrepressible or fail to consider the question altogether. These are not ideal approaches—if we don’t think the issue through, chances are we will be controlled by our passions. There are performers who recognize the disruptive potential of emotions and try to turn them off, become cold, detached, steely. For some personalities this might work, although in my opinion denial tends to melt down when the pressure becomes fierce. Then there are those elite performers who use emotion, observing their moment and then channeling everything into a deeper focus that generates a uniquely flavored creativity. This is an interesting, resilient approach based on flexibility and subtle introspective awareness. Instead of being bullied by or denying their unconscious, these players let their internal movements flavor their fires. Over the years, at various stages of my development, I have found myself all over this spectrum. In time, I have come to believe that this last style, rooted in my notions of The Soft Zone and The Internal Solution, is a potent launching point for a unique approach to performance. In this chapter, I’ll focus on one of the most decisive emotions, one that can make or break a competitor: Anger. As we enter into this discussion, please keep in mind the three steps I described as being critical to resilient, self-sufficient performance. First, we learn to flow with distraction, like that blade of grass bending to the wind. Then we learn to use distraction, inspiring ourselves with what initially would have thrown us off our games. Finally we learn to re-create the inspiring settings internally. We learn to make sandals. My own experience with anger in competition began with being jerked around by a rival of mine whom I mentioned in Part I of the book. This kid was a hugely talented Russian player who immigrated to the U.S. when we were fifteen years old. Immediately he and I were the top two young players in the country. Boris knew how to push my buttons. He was unrestrained by any notion of competitive etiquette or even by the rules. He would do everything it took to win, and would sometimes do things so far outside the lines of normal chess behavior that I was totally taken aback. Consider the hilarity of this moment. We are in the U.S. Junior Championship, last round, playing for the title. I am four or five minutes into a deep thought process. This is the critical position. The ideas are coming together, I’m approaching a solution, and suddenly Boris kicks me under the table, two or three times, hard. Boris studied karate and I know he liked to kick things, but this was ridiculous. There were many times that Boris pummeled me under the table during critical moments of our games, but of course not all of his tactics were so over- the-top. He would shake the board, loudly clear his throat in my face five or six times a minute, tap pieces on the table while I tried to think, or confer about the position in Russian with his coach. The standard reaction to such moments is to go tell the arbiter what is happening. The problem is that when this happened Boris would feign innocence, insist in Russian and broken English that he had no idea what I was talking about, and the arbiter would have nothing to go with. Even if Boris was reprimanded, he had succeeded in getting my mind off the position. He was winning the psychological battle. I found Boris’s disregard for sportsmanship infuriating. People like him hurt the game that I loved. I mentioned in Part I that we both traveled to a world championship in India to represent the United States, and several teams lodged formal protests against the American team because he and his coach were blatantly cheating throughout the event. The whole situation made me sick. The problem is that it also made me angry. Time and again in critical moments of our games, Boris would pull out some dirty trick, and I would get irritated and make an error. To his credit, Boris knew how to get in my head. As a teenager, anger clouded my vision and Boris played me like a drum. After losing a couple of games to him, I realized that righteous indignation would get me nowhere. I decided to block my anger out. When Boris tapped pieces, I took a deep breath. When he talked about the position with his coach, I just played knowing I would have to beat both of them. When Boris shook the board, I ignored him. This might have seemed a good strategy, but the problem with this approach is that Boris didn’t have a limit. He was perfectly content to escalate the situation (for example by leg kick combinations) and eventually I would get pissed off and have a meltdown. It took me some time to realize that blocking out my natural emotions was not the solution. I had to learn to use my moment organically. Instead of being thrown off by or denying my irritation, I had to somehow channel it into a profound state of concentration. It wasn’t until my martial arts career that I really learned how to do this. It took work. The first time this issue came up in my competitive martial arts life was in the finals of my first Tai Chi Chuan Push Hands National Championship in November 2000. I had cruised through the tournament thus far and was in the lead in this match until my opponent head-butted me in the nose, which is blatantly illegal. The referee didn’t see it and play continued. The rules of this particular tournament were that points were scored when someone was unbalanced and either thrown into the air, on the ground, or out of a large ring. No blows to the neck, head, or groin were allowed. About fifteen seconds later he head-butted me again, harder, and a wild surge of anger flew up through my body and into my eyes. The blood rush to the eyes that comes with a hard blow to the nose is, I believe, where the expression “seeing red” comes from. I saw red and went out of control for about ten seconds. On the video it looks like my methodical style somehow mutated into a bullish madness. I was over-aggressive, off-balance and completely vulnerable—quite literally, I was blinded by rage. I almost lost the Nationals in those moments, but fortunately I returned to my senses and was able to win the match. A weakness of mine was exposed and luckily I didn’t have to lose to learn. This experience was disturbing to me on a number of levels. There is the competitive angle, but for me there was also a much more important idea at stake. My relationship to the martial arts is rooted in nonviolence. I don’t get into fights. I don’t want to hurt anyone. I believe that our world is destroying itself with a cycle of violence begetting violence, and I don’t want to have any Download 7.86 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling