Different systems with different learners in different contexts simplify, select and
combine features in different ways for different kinds of assessment. Indeed rather than
being too long, the list of 12 categories is probably unable to accommodate
all the vari-
ants
people choose, and would need to be expanded to be fully comprehensive.
Users of the Framework may wish to consider and where appropriate state:
•
the way in which theoretical categories are simplified into operational approaches in their
system;
•
the extent to which the main factors used as assessment criteria in their system can be
situated in the set of categories introduced in Chapter 5 for which sample scales are
provided in the Appendix, given further local elaboration to take account of specific
domains of use.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment
196