Task 7.
The historic and prehistorical periods have not marked to separate certainly by now.
The traditional and modern outlooks are used which is matter in this article.
The author learns which is used sources , traditional viewpoints' defects and existed changes on this specialty.Traditionally the study of history was limited to the written and spoken word.A new term, prehistory, was coined, to encompass the results of these new fields where they yielded information about times prior
to the existence of written records.
In the twentieth century the artificial division between history and
prehistory was proving problematic. Historians were looking beyond traditional political history narratives with new approaches such as economic,
social and cultural history, all of which relied on various sources of evidence. Additionally, "prehistorians" were using archaeology to explain important events in areas that were traditionally in the field of history .In generally, It is all the same to me talk about above theme but After I read this information , I had understood their difference.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |