The importance of listening in language learning and listening comprehension problems experienced by language learners: a literature
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HEARING AND LISTENING
Download 479.08 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
YABANCI D L REN M NDE D NLEME BECER S N N NEM VE YABANCI D L RENENLER N YA ADI I D NLEME ANLAMA PROBLEMLER B R ALANYAZIN DE ERLEND RMES [#304614]-291967
2. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HEARING AND LISTENING
Kline (1996) states that being aware of the difference between hearing and listening is an important feature for learning and teaching listening effectively. He describes the difference as follows: “Hearing is the reception of sound, listening is the attachment of meaning to the sound. Hearing is passive, listening is active” (p. 7). Similarly, Rost (2002) states the difference as follows: “Hearing is a form of perception. Listening is an active and intentional process. Although both hearing and listening involve sound perception, the difference in terms reflects a degree of intention” (p. 8). According to Flowerdew and Miller (2005), all children are born with the ability to hear. Children first listen and then start to speak. They speak before they read, and finally writing comes after reading. That is, among all the other language skills, listening is the first one to appear (Lundsteen, 1979). Rost (2002) states that over the years listening has been defined in various ways by educators in social sciences depending on their area of expertise. In the 1900s, listening was defined “in terms of reliably recording acoustic signals in the brain” (p. 1). In the 1920s and 1930s, with more information obtained about the human brain, listening was defined as an “unconscious process controlled by hidden cultural schemata” (p. 1). Because of the advances in telecommunications in the 1940s, listening was defined as “successful transmission and recreation of messages” (p. 1). In the 1960s, listening included listeners’ own experiences to understand the intention of the speaker. In the 1970s “the cultural significance of speech behavior” was accepted. In the 1980s and 1990s, listening was defined as “parallel processing of input” (p. 1). O’Malley, Chamot, and Kupper (1989) define listening comprehension as “an active and conscious process in which the listener constructs meaning by using cues from contextual information and from existing knowledge, while relying upon multiple strategic resources to fulfill the task requirements” (p. 434). Vandergrift (1999) defines listening as “a complex, active process in which the listener must discriminate between sounds, understand vocabulary and grammatical structures, interpret stress and intonation, retain what was gathered in all of the above, and interpret it within the immediate as well as the larger sociocultural context of the utterance” (p. 168). To summarize, when all the aforementioned definitions are taken into account, defining listening as a passive skill would be misleading (Anderson & Lynch, 2003; Lindslay & Knight, 2006). If the listener takes part actively in the process of listening linguistically and uses his/her non-linguistic knowledge to follow up the message that the speaker intends in a conversation, if s/he listens, replies, and asks/answers questions, it is active listening (Lindslay & Knight, 2006, Littlewood, 1981). As Anderson and Lynch (2003) state, understanding is not something that happens because of what speaker says, the listener needs to make connections between what s/he hears and what s/he already knows and at the same time he/she tries to comprehend the meaning negotiated by the speaker. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling