Their differential syntactic features and morphological features are the same

This syntactic connection, i.e., the main difference between a non-nuclear predicative connection and a nuclear predicative connection, is that it cannot form the basic structure of a sentence. The syntactic units involved in these sentences falls into the same functional model:

Their differential syntactic features and morphological features are the same:

NP1 NP2 NDP1 NP2
PnP Vf PnNg V inf f.m.6
As a result of analyzing the components individually, impersonal forms of the verbs to reveal, to hide, to confess are considered non-predicate components 2(NP₂). Such devices are available in English but not found in Uzbek.
2.3. The role of negative expressive conjunctions in speech
In English and Uzbek, indivisible conjunctions are represented by the words neither ... nor, na ... na etc. These conjunctions serve mainly to connect the cohesive parts in the speech devices.
In the Uzbek language, in a sentence, cohesive parts can occur in more than one case, performing the same syntactic function. This means that cohesive parts are syntactically equal regardless of the function they come from in a sentence. they maintain equality in connection with another word, i.e., either the two are subject to another parts, or another parts is subject to both of the cohesive parts. Their grammatical forms are also the same, depending on how they are represented by a syntactic unit However, there is no detailed comment on the syntactic relationships of the cohesive parts.
In English theoretical grammar, neither ... nor - is considered a pair of conjunctions denying the element (43.95), in Uzbek grammar na ...na is emphasized as auxiliary (117,145) words or cohesive word (115.168)
In general, in both languages, the elements neither ... nor, na ...na are mainly connectors used to express different relationships between some simple sentences and cohesive parts in the compound sentence. They do not change grammatically and do not have an independent lexical meaning,
1. Neither the railway geologist Foster, nor the company made further mention of Arthur Nelson (D. Carter)
In this sentence neither Foster and nor the company sentence contains the nucleus predicate 1
instead, they are elements with equal rights.
It combines syntactic units on the basis of mutual coordination, and participates in the structure of speech using the nuclear predicative connection with the syntactic unit made, which comes to the sentence structure as a nuclear predicate 2.
Indeed, in terms of coordinative communication, as emphasized A.M. Mukhin (61.139), V.A. Severyanova (81.13), T.S Kharitonova cohesive parts adds to the sentence with the help of the two syntactic connection, that is, if the cohesive parts are connected by a co-ordinating relationship, the second s depending on the position they hold in the sentence, the second syntactic connection ( nuclear predicative, non-nuclear predicative, subordinative) etc. can be connected.
The syntactic interactions of the syntactic units in the above sentence in determining the connections, primarily in order to know the core components We use the emission transformation: Neither the railway geologist Foster nor the company made further mention of Arthur Nelson
Neither ... geologist nor the company made ... mention of Arthur Nelson
Neither ... ... Foster, nor the Company made …..