Trend not only allows people to purchase items from overseas easily but

Answer 2: (Disagreement)
People have divergent attitudes towards the unpaid community services. Certain people strongly argue that these types of services should be included in high school education such as charity activities, teaching other children and activities for society. Even though it has some positives, it should not be included in the high school education due to various reasons.
Unpaid community services should not be mandatory in the high school programmes. First and foremost, students have a lot of subjects to study within a limited period of time and that would become even harder in case the community programmes are made compulsory for them. For example, in India, most of the schools have added more subjects recently in the curriculum of high schools. Besides, if they are to perform such community activities, they would definitely face challenges in the academic area and sometimes, they may fail in the examinations.
Moreover, during this period of time, most of the students are not mature enough. Since they are not capable of handling service programmes effectively, they may feel difficulties and dissatisfied while implementing such activities among others. In addition, it would develop a negative attitude towards the unpaid community services from the tender age. Consequently, they may lose interest in doing those kinds of services later on.
However, one should not ignore the fact that if community services become a part of high school education, everyone gets a chance to work for society. Thus, these programmes instil moral and ethical values in the mind of children which is degenerating today’s generation enormously. Nevertheless, I think that students should be more focused on education and should not be forced to do something that might detract them from their main target and task.
To conclude, despite some advantages, unpaid community services should not be promoted in the early stages of education.

Answer 3: (Agreement)
What is the likely outcome, if unpaid community services make mandatory part of the high school programme? To comment on this subject, I am including a study, which collected statistical data taken from polls conducted, recently, among diverse segments of society. The majority of participants supported the idea, whereas others disagreed with the idea. In subsequent paragraphs, I will discuss the opinion expressed by participants of study with a personal choice of aligning myself with the majority of the society.

According to the survey, there should be no social unpaid work because such an activity will hinder student’s studies. The students will have to take time out of studies diluting concentration. In addition, if social community services are compulsory, then a child might become a victim of bad society trends, especially in their teenage time. The study shows that those participants who had the aforementioned views were in limited number. Some of these opponents presented their ideas logically whereas some others were impulsive and rigid followers of social taboos.
On the other hand, a large majority of those interviewed agreed with the idea, viz. unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. They explained that poor and needy families - which are a part of our society - will be benefitted by this idea. Such a programme will help to build a healthy society.

I am strongly of the view that, the social unpaid work should be made a mandatory part of the high school programme.

Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that high
school
students should be involved in unpaid
community
services as a compulsory part of high
school
programs. I personally believe that sending students to
community
services is a good idea to gather experiences by different activities and it should provide them lots of valuable skills.
To begin
with, compulsory unpaid
community
services encouraged students to do more creative works. When students do different voluntary works, it should increase their experiences.
For instance
, scouting assist students to gather experiences. Compulsory unpaid activities not only be the asset on their CV but
also
increases their employability. If students do not have practical knowledge
then
they do not respect any works and cannot realize the difficulty to earn money.
Hence
, unpaid services as a compulsory part is required to improve experiences.
Furthermore
, by doing voluntary
work
students can learn how to communicate with others and
work
in a team. Working with a group or team increase the skills to manage time, organizing something, decision making and so on.
For example
,
school
club can give a chance to
work
in a team and do different works. After to joining a
school
club students can get a chance to
work
for their society
such
as they can campaign in their locality about environment pollution.
Therefore
, during the campaign students
also
increase their skills to reduce several pollutions. To sum up, unpaid
community
activities should be effective when teaches as a compulsory part in the schools or colleges. I think that it is a very good idea and hope
this
program will be put into action for high schools shortly.

In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
While Some people think that serving paid work by the children would promote serious problems, other opine that it will expand their expertise in practical life. In my opinion, youngsters should be associated with paid work but with proper supervision. On the one hand, wage employment will help the children to grow as a person. If they do jobs with the exchange of remunerations, that will make them more attentive to the tasks, which will let them get expertise in various fields.
Moreover
, they will realize the value of money, and
consequently
, they will be more sensible to save and expend
this
.
Besides
, these young service holders will likely to contribute their income to their studies and other household purposes.
Thus
, paid job placement drives youngster's cognitive development, and apparently, makes them better individuals.
For example
, a survey conducted by Wikipedia reveals that the success rate in careers is higher among those professionals who earned earlier stages in their life.
However
, getting money in hand can let the teenagers go astray. In the early stage of life, humans are a bit immature, and in most cases, they cannot distinguish ethical and unethical issues correctly.
Therefore
, If adolescents have finance, they are likely to do blunder and engage in violence,
such
as bad company, drinking alcohol, or smoking cigarettes.
Hence
, employed children have a great chance of being spoiled.
Nevertheless
, guidance and regular inspection of parents and teachers can refrain these youngsters from these acts and let them to income and acquire competencies. In conclusion, People have contrasting views, whether children should be associated with paid service or not. I think they could earn to become skilful; but, parents should guide and oversee their employed offsprings regularly.

The issue of whether or not the children should be engaged in some paid work has sparked a heated debate. People have already differed around it. Some argue that having some employment experience is conducive to the child's learning and development.
However
, I believe that youngsters have to enjoy their time
instead
of working.
This
essay will deal with my viewpoint on the matter and opposing views to reach the most proper concept. On the one hand, I firmly believe that minors should stay away from working. There are many reasons, the most obvious one is that youths must spend their time in education, and explore a new nation by travelling abroad.
Furthermore
, learn a new language to be able to acquire a job in a multinational organization that requires a bilingual candidate.
For instance
, adolescents can utilize their spare time in learning new skills, like communication and negotiation skills,
instead
of working.
On the other hand
, a group of people argue that children should work because they will gain more experience and skills from an early age for the following reasons.
Firstly
, youths will be reliable and have the ability to be more responsible.
Additionally
, they will gain much money to be able to cover their basic need and carry the money for their future.
For example
, if young people acquire a job at an early age, they will have advantages over their colleagues. To summarize, even though both concepts seem convincing, as each one of them has its own rationale. Yet, I strongly agree with the
last
opinion, which states that children must not get a job at a very early young age, for the previously mentioned reasons.