29
He also says: “I take communicative competence to include
capability for use necessarily includes knowledge of what is linguistically
appropriate for any given context”. For instance, this concept does move
apart from Chomsky’s original notion of
competence and adds a new
perspective or twist to it.
We must remark that Chomsky (1965) states that ‘competence’ is
a technical term within transformational-generative grammar to mean a
hypothetical
monolingual
native-speaker’s
tacit
knowledge
of
grammaticality. To remark this difference some linguists have with
Chomsky’s theories we can refer to Le Page (1973) who describes
competence in his way (which he claims is not the same as Chomsky’s)
as a quality or resource that consists in
having available a code, and the
knowledge of how and in what contexts to use that code.
Communicative competence itself divides into four major components as
described in the next table stated by Canale and Swain (1980).
Communicative
Competence
1.
Grammatical competence: words and rules
2. Sociolinguistic competence: appropriateness.
3. Discourse competence: cohesion and coherence.
4. Strategic competence: appropriate use of communication strategies.
30
Grammatical competence
Grammatical competence can be seen as the ability to recognize
and produce the distinctive grammatical structures of a language and to
use them effectively in communication.
In addition to the concept
presented above grammatical
competence comprises knowledge of vocabulary, syntax, morphology
and phonology/graphology (Bachman 1990). For example,
a person
needs to arrange words in a correct order in a sentence with appropriate
endings (e.g. high, higher, or highest).
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: