Variant – 3 What problems is text semantics concerned with?

Discuss the problems of individual style.

Special significance in text stylistics is attached to the problems of individual style. Individual style (idiostyle) is regarded as a complex structural unity of the means and forms of verbal expressions peculiar to certain authors, and reflecting their world vision and subjective evaluation of the described phenomena. In this field of research good results have been achieved both in practical and theoretical aspects. Suffice it to mention the works by V. V. Vinogradov, G. O. Vinokur, I. R. Galperin, I. V. Arnold, V. A. Kukharenko and others. These works give rise to theoretical discussions of the following problems:

● individual specificity of fictional texts;
● the author’s image and viewpoint;
● types of the narrator;
● a polyphonic structure of the literary text;
● correlation of individual style with general language norms;
● individual peculiarities of the language usage in the text.
The key notion of the theory of individual style is the notion of the author’s image, which was introduced by V.V. Vinogradov. The author’s image is a focus of the whole text, its content and compositional structure. As V.A.Kukharenko stated, the author’s image is an organizing centre of the whole literary work, it combines its separate parts into a united whole characterized by a single world outlook (1988:179).
At the present stage of text stylistics a new impetus has been given to the problem of “individual paradigm”, and a new term “cognitive style” has emerged. This term is defined as a style of conveying and presenting information, its peculiar arrangement in the text/discourse connected with a specific choice of cognitive operations or their preferable usage in the process of text production and interpretation (КСКТ, 1996:80). Cognitive style is regarded as a style of the author’s individual representation associated with his personality, the peculiarities of an individual creative process of thinking and subjective modality.

3.