KamLAND Collaboration T. Araki1, K. Eguchi1, S. Enomoto1, K. Furuno1, K. Ichimura1, H. Ikeda1, K. Inoue1, K. Ishihara1, T. Iwamoto1, T. Kawashima1, Y. Kishimoto1, M. Koga1, Y. Koseki1, T. Maeda1, T. Mitsui1, M. Motoki1, K. Nakajima1, H. Ogawa1, K. Owada1, J.-S. Ricol1, I. Shimizu1, J. Shirai1, F. Suekane1, A. Suzuki1, K. Tada1, O. Tajima1, K. Tamae1, Y. Tsuda1, H. Watanabe1, J. Busenitz2, T. Classen2, Z. Djurcic2, G. Keefer2, K. McKinny2, D-M. Mei2, A. Piepke2, E. Yakushev2, B.E. Berger3, Y.D. Chan3, M.P. Decowski3, D.A. Dwyer3, S.J. Freedman3, Y. Fu3, B.K. Fujikawa3, J. Goldman3, F. Gray3, K.M. Heeger3, K.T. Lesko3, K.-B. Luk3, H. Murayama3, A.W.P. Poon3, H.M. Steiner3, L.A. Winslow3, G.A. Horton-Smith4, C. Mauger4, R.D. McKeown4, P. Vogel4, C.E. Lane5, T. Miletic5, P.W. Gorham6, G. Guillian6, J.G. Learned6, J. Maricic6, S. Matsuno6, S. Pakvasa6, S. Dazeley7, S. Hatakeyama7, A.Rojas7, R. Svoboda7, B.D. Dieterle8, J. Detwiler9, G. Gratta9, K. Ishii9, N. Tolich9, Y. Uchida9, M. Batygov10, W. Bugg10, Y. Efremenko10, Y. Kamyshkov10, A. Kozlov10, Y. Nakamura10, H.J. Karwowski11, D.M. Markoff11, J.A. Messimore11, K. Nakamura11, R.M. Rohm11, W. Tornow11, R. Wendell11, A.R. Young11, M.-J. Chen12, Y.-F. Wang12, and F. Piquemal13
1Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA 3Physics Department, University of California at Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4W. K. Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 5Physics Department, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA 8Physics Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 9Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA 10Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA 11Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA and Physics Departments at Duke University, North Carolina State University, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 12Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100039, People's Republic of China 13CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan, IN2P3-CNRS and University Boreaux I, F-33175 Gradignan Cedex, France
Introduction to reactor measurement
KamLAND Situated to Detect Reactor Anti-neutrinos
KamLAND (Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector)
The Detector
Inside the Detector
Determining the Event Vertex
Tagged Cosmogenics used as Calibration Device
Fraction of volume used verified using μ-produced 12B/12N and n
Energy Calibration Using Sources and 12B/12N
Selecting Electron Anti-neutrinos Rprompt, Rdelayed < 5.5m ΔR < 2m 0.5μs < ΔT < 1ms 1.8MeV < Edelayed < 2.6MeV 2.6MeV < Eprompt < 8.5MeV
2003 saw a substantial dip in reactor anti-neutrino flux
Good correlation with reactor flux
Energy spectrum shows distortion
Oscillations with L/E
Alternative neutrino propagation models
Two flavor rate and shape analysis
Improvement since first result
Prospects Measure the global concentration of U and Th in the Earth Solar anti-neutrinos Solar neutrinos Exotic nucleon decay modes Observe supernova neutrinos
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |