Download 3.08 Kb.Pdf ko'rish
Translating Style A Literary Approach to Translation - A Translation Approach to Literature ( PDFDrive )
Doc 552fd41685d9465ea9c3454244ebcfea, ZARIFA NURMUXAMADOVNA, 05.14, Reja.doc, komp 2lab, Презентация Microsoft PowerPoint, HBAS-62 Nurullayeva Madina Budjet (pdf format), 1403752579 46337, 4-ma’ruza. Qattiq jism aylanma harakati, вопросник логопед ит, 3-sinf O\'zbek titlidan javoblari, 1 lab konspektga, 1-laboratoriya, 32-32-16 ишчи дастур, New Документ Microsoft Word
Quick and Delicious.
Una cucina rapida e squisita – a cuisine/type of cooking [that is] quick
The concept ‘cucina’ (type of cooking) is absent (or only implicit) in the Eng-
lish. The presence of the word raises the register in the Italian. If translating
from the Italian, would an English translator have had any reasons for omitting
the word? Perhaps yes, in the sense that the only word available in English
here is ‘cuisine’, which seems too noble a concept for this kind of piece. But
equally we can see why an Italian translator of an English original might
have wished to introduce the word. If he did not, he would have had to give
masculine plural endings to the two adjectives ‘rapido’ and ‘squisito’ (quick,
delicious) in order to have them agree with ‘piatti’ (dishes), and this would
seem extremely primitive, stylistically, in Italian. Since both texts in this case
might easily be the result of translation from the other, this difference tells us
very little about which text is the original.
The time-saver’s cookbook.
Il libro di cucina che vi farà risparmiare tempo – the book of cooking
that] will save you time
Here one can merely note that while it would take an inventive English trans-
lator to arrive at the compression of ‘time-saver’s’, an Italian translator of the
English expression has no alternative but to offer this entirely standard formula.
Italian does not share with English the resource either of the compound noun
or the Anglo-Saxon genitive and is thus forced to introduce a ‘that’ clause,
‘the book that will save you time.’
If you love good food but hate spending time preparing it
Se apprezzate la buona cucina ma non avete il tempo per dedicarvi
alla preparazione dei cibi
(If you appreciate good cooking but don’t have the time to give to
As with the title, the English, with its concept ‘hate’, seems more radical than
the Italian ‘ma non avete tempo’ (but don’t have time). Again while it is hard to
imagine an English translator introducing such a strong notion while working
from the blander Italian, we can see every reason for an Italian translator to
Identifying an Original
eliminate it. For one cannot reasonably assume, in Italy, that a large number
of people ‘hate’ cooking, or, even assuming they do, that they are willing to
admit as much.
The next divergence between the texts, ‘the cookbook you’ve been wait-
ing for’ and ‘il libro che fa per voi’ (the book that makes/is for you) hardly
helps us with the task of identiﬁcation, since, as with ‘in un minuto’ and ‘in
minutes’, both expressions have the same register and work well here in their
respective languages, despite the evident difference in meaning. However, on
reaching the last sentence, our growing suspicions that this must be an English
original are amply conﬁrmed.
GREAT MEALS IN MINUTES makes it possible for you to get in
and out of the kitchen in a snap – without resorting to those expensive
and all-too-familiar entrées.
PIATTI PRONTI IN UN MINUTO vi consentirà di entrare e uscire
dalla cucina in un momento, senza dover ricorrere alle pietanze sur-
gelate, tanto costose quanto ormai sin troppo comuni.
(DISHES READY IN A MINUTE will allow you to go in and out of
the kitchen in a moment, without resorting to deep-frozen meals, as
expensive by now as they are all too common)
Here the very colloquial, unusual and appropriate, ‘in a snap’ is hardly
matched, nor could have been inspired, by ‘in un momento’ (in a moment),
while the last line shows the English referring to a cultural context (the use
of recognizable deep-frozen entrées) which has to be explained in the Italian,
whose readers are perhaps not familiar with such practices at all.
What conclusions can be drawn from all this? First that the text has been
translated with a strong sense of purpose, or function. The translator strives
to domesticate its content in order to arrive at the text’s desired end (to sell
the book). In this sense one might object that from a certain point of view,
with the elimination of ‘great’ and ‘hate’, the text has not been ‘translated’ at
all. For example, were this piece to appear in an American novel satirizing
incongruous American attitudes to cooking, then an Italian translator with the
task of communicating that incongruity in his own language would have been
wise to maintain ‘great’ and ‘hate’. No longer obliged to be faithful to the
text’s commercial function he would be eager to draw attention to its culture
Similarly, had our ﬁrst piece about the attractions of Mantua appeared in
an Italian novel ridiculing the kind of rhetoric to be found in Italian tourist
Download 3.08 Kb.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2022
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling