An examination of public-private partnerships
Page 38 The Whitney Apartments ‐ Bethesda Garage – Bethesda Theater
Download 1.66 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Vrooman An Examination of Public-Private Partnerships Partnership Structure, Policy Marking, and Public Value 2012 Sislen
Page 38 The Whitney Apartments ‐ Bethesda Garage – Bethesda Theater The redevelopment of the Bethesda Theater was not initially envisioned as a public‐private partnership but as the deal developed different elements of the project were structured and managed similar to a PPP. In 1991, the Owner of the Bethesda Theater, who was not in the real estate industry, was interested in selling the theater to a developer to preserve the theater and develop an office building on the property. The property was zoned for a commercial use, but in order for an office building to work the adjacent property needed to be acquired which did not happen. A residential use was an option within the CBD zone but the developer would have to apply to rezone the property as they were advised by a development consultant. The property owner applied to rezone the property to allow for residential use prior to selling the property. The sale included the theater parcel and the parcel adjacent to the rear public parking garage. The challenge here was that the public parking garage was owned and operated by Montgomery County. The garage was directly behind the theater property making the sale and redevelopment more difficult. Page 39 Through negotiations, the County agreed to trade parcels for the redevelopment of the theater and housing to be one fluent project. The agreement included the construction of a new underground parking garage for residents and the public. The County was interested in this because they would benefit from additional parking at no cost to them. This larger garage could provide space for the anticipated growth along the Bethesda commercial/commuter corridor. The rezoning process did not begin until 1996. The developer team was a joint venture between The Bozzuto Group, Smith & Payes, LLP, and Times Square Real Estate Investors. The development team met with citizens and the planning commission throughout the public approval process. The public voiced a number of concerns with the overall development because they were concerned the theater would not be preserved. Concerns with the development included cutting off access to the adjacent neighborhood, constructing a new apartment tower that would not blend in with the adjacent single family home communities, and bringing a rental property to the neighborhood which was perceived to lower the local home property value. The property values in this area did not decrease due to the development and it may have increased the property values. The plan for the new development addressed the community concerns by creating a transition of 3‐story townhomes and landscaped buffers between the single family neighborhood and the high‐rise apartment building. The rezoning process and abandonment of an existing alley continued through August 1998 when both were approved. The approvals did not go unnoticed when an appeal was brought up by an adjoining property owner but this was resolved with a permanent easement that cut through the new garage. In fall 1998, the Art Deco Society of Washington (ADSW) filed for the theater to be considered for the National Register of Historic Places to preserve the theater. There was another year delay due to building setback requirements from the theater and additional opposition to the new development. Other opp Redevelop The devel but as a re the apartm County re 2001, the municipal including Economic together i involved. The contr County w owned an was fully a position grou pment Killer) lopment desig esult, additio ment building equirements f final site pla l approvals w the develope c Developmen in planning m ractual structu here the deve nd leased from amortized. T ps were creat . gn was modif nal approvals g. In 2000, ag for MPDU uni n approval w were received er, the County nt, and the St meetings and t ure for the pa eloper built a m the develop The maintena ted in Bethes fied to accom s were neede greements we its and buildin as received a in July 2001 a y, the ADSW, ate of Maryla through appr arking garage and financed t per to the pu nce and the o sda such as SH mmodate the ed as the deve ere made on ng heights we long with a v allowing cons residents, M and business rovals to find e was an agree the parking g blic for a sho operation of t HARK (Save H new required eloper reques the garage d ere also appr variance for th struction to b ontgomery C and economi a solution th ement betwe garage. The p rt term lease the public gar Historic Archit d setbacks for sted to increa esign with th oved at the s he building he begin. All of t County Depar ic developme at was a win‐ een the devel parking garage of 5‐10 year rage were tra Pa tecture from r the preserva ase the heigh e County. Th same time. In eight. Final he stakehold tment of ent teams wo ‐win for all loper and the e was private s until the ga ansferred bac age 40 ation t of he n ers rked e ely rage ck to Page 41 the County. At the time the loan was paid, the developer sold the 396 parking garage back to the County at the end of the lease for a previously agreed upon amount. In order to build the development the air rights over the public garage were given to the developer. In the end, the public maintained access to Wisconsin Avenue through an accessible route in the garage. This was an agreement the Developer agreed to due to the removal of an existing alley. The Ownership of the theater was donated by the developer in 2006 to a non‐profit organization, the Bethesda Cultural Alliance, to own and operate the theater. The developer received tax benefits/credits for the creation of the Bethesda Arts & Entertainment District and the Theater Historic Registry designation. Nederlander Worldwide Entertainment was the production management team contracted to manage the shows that would be showcased at the theater. In 2007, at the beginning of the economic downturn the theater struggled to bring in productions that profited and the theater was not successful and defaulted on the mortgage. In June 2010, the Bethesda Cultural Alliance closed and has sat vacant since. The Alliance had hoped the County could buy the mortgage keeping the theater in public han to Richard As a resul previous o soar to th installed t developm area. Wi increased communit succeed b The privat benefited nds, but the C d W. Brown (C t of this deve one increasin e community to provide a m ment has incre th the County its total tax b ty. The comm but the hope te developer d from the hig County did no Citybiz, 2012) elopment, the ng the revenu y and was rep more appealin eased the den y’s cooperatio base in prope munity benef is that a new also benefite gh use of the ot have the av ). e County bene e stream for placed with a ng transition nsity of the pr on to negotia erty taxes, inc ited from the organization ed with a high bigger garage vailable fundi efited from a the County, t more attract between the roperty and im ate the redeve come taxes, a e restoration o will be able t h occupancy f e. ing. The thea new garage the existing g tive garage. L e neighborhoo mproved the elopment and and increased of the theate to preserve a for the apartm ater was sold that was larg arage was co Landscaped b od and Wisco urban develo d the land sw d the value of er but unfortu and make the ments and the Pa in February 2 ger than the onsidered an e buffers were a onsin Avenue. opment in th wap, the Coun the homes in unately it did theater a suc e County age 42 2012 eye also . The e nty n the not ccess. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling