Analysis of the possibilities of using reflected radiation of ground-based radioelectronic devices from low-orbit Earth satellites
Download 445.63 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Analysis of the possibilities of using reflected radiation
Fig. 2. The main lobe of the shadow contour scattering diagram The peak of the main lobe of the SD along the direction of propagation of the incident wave can be immense. An essential feature of bistatic forward scattering is that an intense reflected signal can arrive at the receiver even in cases when the "object- receiver" direction corresponds to the side lobes of the shadow field diagram. The ESA value when the directions from the diffuser coincide with the source of the probing signal and the observation point is called a backscattering diagram (BSD). For experimental determination, the BSD REM is moved around objects and at the same time the field strength of the Е рх is measured (Fig.3, a). Then the tested object is replaced with a reference (usually shaped like a ball) with a known ERA value of σ оэ and the Е оэ field strength is determined. Объект ДОР РЭ С D Пер еда тчик Прием ник Объект ДР D a) b) Fig. 3. Conditions for the experimental determination of BSD and SD . In contrast to the considered case of single-position (monostatic) REM, the term ESA (effective scattering area) is more applicable for two-position (bistatic) REM. To remove the SD, you can, for example, fix the transmitter and move the receiver around the circle around the object (Fig.3, b). The possibility of comparing SD and BSD in some cases is of interest. So, for simple ideally conducting bodies of sufficient smoothness at a small wavelength (strictly speaking, tending to zero) and the transmitter—object—receiver angle β <180°, the SD is equal to the BSD in the direction of the angle bisector β. It follows that the SD does not change if you swap the transmitter and receiver. This theorem is clearly incorrect at angles β ≈ 180° i.e., near the so-called forward scattering (or shadow scattering). ERA of two-point objects. Several point objects located within the allowed volume form a group object. The simplest model of group objects is two-point. а) О 1 О 2 D 1 D 2 D РЭС b) Е 1 Е 2 Fig. 4. Determining the ERA of two point objects It consists of two isotropic reflectors, the distance between which is L, and the distance to the REM is D 1 and D 2 (Fig. 4, a). Such a model correctly describes complex objects containing at least two shiny points. Real objects contain many brilliant points, however, using the example of a two-point model, it is possible to trace the most important patterns that occur when the REM signal is reflected from complex objects. The secondary radiation fields of each of the reflectors О 1 and О 2 at the REM are characterized in a complex form by the following expressions: 𝐸 1 𝑒 𝑗𝜔(𝑡−𝑡 31 ) = 𝐸 1 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 1 𝑒 𝑗𝜔𝑡 , 𝐸 2 𝑒 𝑗𝜔(𝑡−𝑡 32 ) = 𝐸 2 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 2 𝑒 𝑗𝜔𝑡 , (1.2) The fields of individual reflectors at the REM are summed up. The total field is represented as 𝐸̇ 𝑝 𝑒 𝑗𝜔𝑡 , where the complex amplitude 𝐸̇ 𝑝 = 𝐸 1 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 1 + 𝐸 2 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 2 . (1.3) Accordingly, the amplitude 𝐸 𝑝 = |𝐸 1 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 1 + 𝐸 2 𝑒 −𝑗𝜑 2 | = √𝐸 1 2 + 𝐸 2 2 + 2𝐸 1 𝐸 2 cos 𝜑 1,2 (1.4) where is the phase difference of the oscillations from the individual reflectors: 𝜑 1,2 = 𝜑 1 − 𝜑 2 = 2𝜋 𝜆 2(𝐷 2 − 𝐷 1 ) = 4𝜋 𝜆 𝐿 sin 𝜃 (1.5) A similar result for E р can be obtained using the formula of an oblique triangle when adding two vectors (Fig. 4, b). Applying formula (1.1) and assuming that its primary field Е о is the same for both objects, we obtain the ERA of two-point objects 𝜎 𝑜 = 4𝜋𝐷 2 𝐸 𝑝 2 𝐸 𝑜 2 = 4𝜋𝐷 2 ( 𝐸 1 2 𝐸 𝑜 2 + 𝐸 2 2 𝐸 𝑜 2 + 2 𝐸 1 𝐸 𝑜 𝐸 2 𝐸 𝑜 cos 𝜑 1,2 ) = = 𝜎 𝑜1 + 𝜎 𝑜2 + 2√𝜎 𝑜1 𝜎 𝑜2 cos 𝜑 1,2 (1.6) In particular, for identical objects, when σ o1 = σ o2 = σ o0 , we obtain the following expression for BSD: 𝜎 o (𝜃) = 2𝜎 o0 [1 + cos ( 4𝜋𝐿 𝜆 sin 𝜃)] = 4𝜎 o0 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 ( 2𝜋𝐿 𝜆 sin 𝜃) (1.7) The analysis of the dependence 𝜎 o (𝜃) shows that it is multi-petal (Fig.5). The zeros of the function 𝜎 o (𝜃) correspond to the directions where the secondary oscillations of two objects are in antiphase and cancel each other out, and the maximum to the directions of in—phase addition, and the resulting ERA exceeds four times the ERA of each object. The greater the ratio L/λ, the stronger the interference nature of the dependence 𝜎 o (𝜃) is manifested. If group objects consist of n reflectors, then the resulting field 𝐸 𝑝 = |∑ 𝐸 𝑘 𝑒 𝑗𝜑 𝑘 𝑛 𝑘=1 |. (1.8) Small random movements of objects lead to random changes in the phase difference φ i,k and, as a result, to significant fluctuations in the amplitudes of the reflected signals. If the phase difference φ i,k is equally probable in the range 0–π, then the average value of the cosine cosφ i,k =0. Therefore, the average value of the ERA 𝜎 ц ̅̅̅ = ∑ 𝜎 ц𝑖 𝑛 𝑖=1 . (1.9) 1 2 3 0 о 90 о 180 о 270 о а) 1 2 3 4 0 о 90 о 180 о 270 о b) Fig. 5. BSD of two-point objects For n=2, this directly follows from the fact that, for 𝜑 1,2 = 𝜋,: 𝜎 o ̅̅̅ = (𝜎 o 𝑚𝑎𝑥 + 𝜎 o 𝑚𝑖𝑛 ). (1.10) The power of reflected radiation depends on the ESA σ of objects, which depends on the main reflective properties of objects, such as the size of the object (the projection area of the body on a plane perpendicular to the direction of the REM), configuration, surface material, the wavelength of the REM, its polarization, the direction of irradiation. The power of the reflected signal in the receiving antenna is given by the equation: 𝑃 𝑟 = 𝑃 𝑡 𝐺 𝑡 𝐺 𝑟 𝜆 2 𝜎 (4𝜋) 3 𝑅 𝑡 2 𝑅 𝑟 2 𝐿 (1.11) This equation establishes the relationship between the received signal power 𝑃 𝑟 and the radiation power 𝑃 𝑡 . From the formula (1.11) it can be seen that with increasing distance to objects, the power of the received signal decreases very quickly-inversely proportional to the 4th degree of range. In this regard, the power of the received signal will be small, and the signal itself is random. The low power of the reflected signal is explained by the large distance to objects in near-Earth orbits and the absorption of signal energy during its propagation. Using the MATLAB Radar Equation Calculator application, it is possible to determine the required signal strength of the transmitter according to the formula (1.11) (Fig.6). It is necessary to enter data such as wavelength, pulse width, system losses in dB, noise temperature and effective scattering area of objects, gain of transmitting and receiving antennas, signal/interference ratio on the receiving antenna (probability of detection, probability of false alarm, number of pulses) and distance to objects. When performing the calculation for the radio communication system under consideration, the parameters given in Table 1 were used. TABLE I. S YSTEM P ARAMETERS Download 445.63 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling