“Which developed so powerfully and fruitfully from the 1820s to the 1880s. This discovery enabled linguists to explain modern languages as a result of law-governed historical development” On a closer look one realizes that without a good synchronic (descriptive) work, valid historical (diachronic) postulations are not possible; in other words, a good historical linguist needs to be thorough descriptive scholar too. References - http://changingminds.org/explanations/critical_theory/concepts/synchrony_diachrony.htm
- https://www.quora.com/What-are-synchrony-and-diachrony-in-terms-of-linguistics
- http://www.angelfire.com/md2/timewarp/saussure.html
- https://www.thoughtco.com/synchronic-linguistics-1692015
- https://neoenglish.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/write-a-note-on-linguistic-synchrony-and-diachrony/
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
