Chapter 1 the study of collocations
Figure 17. Model of the Development of Collocational Knowledge
Download 0.8 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
colloca
Figure 17. Model of the Development of Collocational Knowledge According to this model, collocational knowledge develops as overall language proficiency develops, as students become more mature, and as more exposure to collocations takes place. The development of collocational knowledge is influenced by the 'salience' of the particular collocation types. Grammatical collocations that are simple and frequent in everyday speech are early acquired. 45 The more complex structures are acquired later. Lexical collocations are more difficult to acquire than the simple grammatical collocations. They are syntactically simple (e.g. Noun Verb, Verb Noun, Noun Prep, Prep Noun, Verb Adverb), but their acquisition is affected by other factors of 'semantic complexity', e.g. arbitrariness, predictability and idiomaticity, i.e. the more fixed and idiomatic they are, the more difficult they are to acquire. Also, based on these results, a continuum of collocational knowledge and language proficiency can be described. Beginning students (Group 1) are able to produce simple grammatical collocations, they are more accurate on lexical collocations than complex grammatical collocations, but their overall accuracy is low. This can be interpreted as evidence that these students use lexical collocations as unanalysed blocks of language that they have memorised, and because their grammatical competence is not yet well-developed, they are less accurate with the more structurally demanding grammatical collocations. The fact that they can memorise lexical collocations more than grammatical ones could be due to the saliency of lexical collocations in terms of length of the collocational strings, i.e. most of the lexical collocation types consist of two words (Verb Adverb, Adjective Noun, Noun Prep, Adjective Prep) so they are easier to remember. Grammatical collocations, on the other hand, are longer and as such harder to memorise. At the intermediate level (Group 2), students become more accurate with the more complex grammatical collocations as their grammatical competence 46 increases, but their accuracy on lexical collocations and their overall accuracy do not improve. As students reach a higher level of proficiency, post-intermediate (Group 3), their overall accuracy in collocations (both lexical and grammatical) increases considerably, and they once again show greater accuracy on lexical collocations, indicating a richer vocabulary. Previous research has also shown that more advanced learners have more lexical and syntactic tools when they approach a language learning task (Ferris 1991, 1994). A similar step-by-step model of L1 acquisition is described by Berman (1986). According to Berman's model, children in acquiring their L1 go through three main phases: (a) a PREGRAMMATICAL phase... where children's knowledge is largely item-bound...; (b) the phase of GRAMMAR ACQUISITION..., where rules are applied productively across items in terms of linguistic structure, and items are interrelated within more general systems, categories and paradigms; and (c) a final phase of APPROPRIATE USAGE where the repertoire of forms and rules acquired previously are deployed with increasing skill. (Berman 1986:193). The beginners' stage is similar to Berman's pregrammatical phase: they learn collocations as lexicalised items. At the intermediate level, learners are at the phase of grammar acquisition: they apply rules productively, increasing their 47 knowledge of grammatical collocations. At the post-intermediate level, students are approaching Berman's final phase of appropriate usage: their overall knowledge of collocations increases for both grammatical and lexical collocations. Since collocations are one of the key building blocks of language, it is not surprising that their acquisition proceeds to a pattern similar to L1 acquisition. Pienemann's Processability Model also provides a framework for understanding the development of collocational knowledge. The first stage of Pienemann's model consists of basic sentence structures and basic categories (Pienemann 1996). This stage coincides with the initial stage of collocational knowledge: learners acquire simple grammatical collocations and relatively free lexical collocations that are basic and frequent in everyday speech. The second stage of Pienemann's model contains extensions of the noun phrase, verb phrase, and sentence. This is the stage where students become able to apply grammatical rules productively and have a better understanding of the constituents of the sentence resulting to the use of more complex collocational strings. Stage 3 of the Processability model is characterised by the use of new categories which are filled with lexical items. The third stage of collocational knowledge is also characterised by a better command of both lexical and grammatical and a preference for lexical collocations signifying a richer vocabulary. The roughly parallel stages between Pienemann's Processability model and the model of the development of collocational knowledge described in this study underscore the existence of a 48 stage-by-stage development of collocational knowledge and its significance for the overall development of L2 proficiency. Download 0.8 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling