Content: Introduction The Impact of lingua-cultural rhetorical questions on dialogues general-rhetorical questions 2 Examples of rhetorical questions 15 Benefit

Conclusion

My course work displayed the thorough data on rhetorical question which is the one for the questioner does not expect a direct answer: in many cases it may be intended to start a discourse, or as a means of displaying the speaker's or author's opinion on a topic. And the impact of RQ on speech whether oral or written form defining with punctuation or intuition. I have learned much about RQ and had no idea about what big the theme included at all. Below try to show some examples of my work relating to what I learned.

A common example is the question "Can't you do anything right?" This question, when posed, is intended not to ask about the listener's ability but rather to insinuate the listener's lack of ability.
The way of rhetorical questions define what speaker mean is so special and mostly does not choose culture or language. For instance, in different language you can use them and they show you what you mean by just asking a question even without an answer even in Uzbek language.
By teaching students how to use rhetorical questions, any teacher could get the broaden language usage by common communication such as collocations according to the way of it.
In my coursework I tried to mention the importance of RQ especially with the help of mentioning language as a communicating device of people in modern world comparing to different culture.

REFERENCES

1. Galperin I.R. Stylistics. – Moscow: Higher school, 1977. – 335 p.

2. Delaney D. and others. Fields of Vision. – Essex: Volume I. Longman, 2003. – 480 p.
3. Delaney D. and others. Fields of Vision. – Essex: Volume II. Longman, 2003. – 530 p.
4. Quronov D. Introduction to Literature. – Toshkent, 2004. – 224 p.
5. Saidova M.U. Lexical Stylistic Devices and Literary Terms of Figurative Language//
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN:2277-3878, Volume-X, Issue-X, July 2019, p. 1-3.
6. Skrebnyov M.Y. Fundamentals of English Stylistics. – Moscow: Astrel, 1994. – 221 p.
7. Sosnovskya V.B. Analytical Reading. – Moskva: Visshaya shkola, 1974. – 191 p.
8. Wellek R. and Warren A. Theory of literature. – New York: A Harvest book, 1956. – 375 p.
9. Znamenskaya T.A. Stylistics of the English Language. –URCC, 2008. – 214 p.
10. Arnold I. V. Stylistics of Modern English: Decoding Stilistics. – Moskva: Prosveshenie, 1990. – 295 p.
11. Boboxonova L.T. English Stylistics. – Tashkent: O‘qituvchi, 1995. – 144 p.
12. Esin A.B. Principles and devices of analysis of literary text. – Moskva: Flinta, 2010. – 248 p.
13. Ivashkin M.P. Practice of English Stylistics. – Nijniy Novgorod, 1999. – 117 p.
14. Kuznets M.D., Skrebnev YU. M. Stylistics of English. – Leningrad, 1972. – 175
15. Kuxarenko V. A. Seminars in style. – Moscow, 1971. – 184 p.
16. Kuxarenko V. A. Practice of English Stylistics: Pіdruchnik. –Vіnnitsya: Nova kniga, 2000. – 184 p.
17. Timofeev L.I. i Vengrov M.P. Short dictionary of literary terms. – Moskva: Uchpedgiz, 1963. – 192 p.
18. Xazagerov G.G., Lobanov I.B. Fundamentals of Theory of Literature. – Rostov-naDonu:Feniks, 2009. 316 p.
19. Xalizev V.E. Theory of Literature. – Moskva: Visshaya shkola, 2005. 405 p.
20. Hotamov N., Sarimsoqov B. Russian-Uzbek Interpretive Dictionary of Literary Terms. – T.: O‘qituvchi, 1979. – 365 p.