Contents I. Introduction chapter I. Cognitive aspects of grammar

LIST OF USED LITERATURE

1. 
   Langacker, Ronald W. (1982) 'Space Grammar, Analysability, and the English Passive', Language, 58, 1, 22-80.
   

2. 
   Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   

3. 
   Langacker, Ronald W. (1990) Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 1.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [paperback edition 1991]
   

4. 
   Langacker, Ronald W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   
5. 
   Langacker, Ronald W. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   

6. 
   Sattonnet, Marie-Cécile. Étude comparée de la Grammaire Cognitive de Ronald W. Langacker et des grammaires énonciatives. (Thèse de Doctorat). ANRT, 2001
   

7. 
   Taylor, John R. (2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University PressChapman, S., & Routledge, C. (2009). Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press.
   

8. 
   Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Perspectives. Stanford University Press.
   

9. 
   Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press.
   

10. 
    Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying cognitive grammar in the foreign language classroom. In Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer.
    

11. 
    Uzum, B. (2010). Applications of cognitive linguistics: Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(1), 160-161.
    

12. 
    Harrison, C., & Giovanelli, M. (2020). Cognitive Grammar in the Classroom. Oxford University Press.
    

13. 
    Nesset, T. (2009). Ronald W. Langacker, cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Journal of Linguistics, 45(2), 477-480.
    

14. 
    Peters, B. (1998). Cognitive musings. Word, 49(2), 225-237.
    

15. 
    Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2012). On the status of external evidence in the theories of cognitive linguistics: Compatibility problems or signs of stagnation in the field? Or: Why do some linguists behave like Fodor’s input systems? Language Sciences, 34(6), 656-66
    
16. 
    Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
    

17. 
    Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    

18. 
    Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on 'noticing the gap': Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126
    

19. 
    Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the 'noticing' hypothesis. Language Learning 45: 283-331.
    

20. 
    Schachter, J. (1976). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24, 205-214
    

21. 
    Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    
22. 
    Scovel, T. (2001). Learning New Languages: A Guide to Second Language Acquisition. Boston: Heinle and Heinle
    

23. 
    Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-241.
    

Internet sources:
www.google.uz
www.search.com
www.vikipedia.com
www.yandex.ru