Proof of Corollary 1.5. We would like to use directly the continuous mapping theorem. However, Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 only give the convergence in distribution on D ([−R, R] × [0, 1]) which leads to the converge nce in (1.28) and (1.29) where the integral over R are replaced by integrals over [−R, R]. Then we show that the contribution of the integrals on R \ [−R, R] is negligible.
More formally, we will use the Theorem 4.2 in [1].
Proposition
|
2.8. Let Yn(R)
|
n,R>1
|
be
|
a family of random variable and let (Yn)n>1 and
|
(ZR)R>1 be a sequence of random variables such that
|
for all R
|
|
1, the sequence Y
|
(R)
|
converges in distribution to a random variable
|
(1) ZR;
|
|
>
|
|
|
n
|
n>1
| -
the sequence (ZR)R>1 converges in distribution to a random variable Z and
-
for all positive ε,
lim lim sup
|
n
|
Y (R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
(2.106)
|
P
|
−
|
Y
|
n
|
|
> ε
|
= 0
|
.
|
R→+∞ n→+∞
|
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |