Different approaches in lesson development Content Introduction

Conclusion
First and foremost, it is perhaps the nature of the language being taught that determines if an inductive approach is possible. Inductive learning is an option for language with salient features and consistency and simplicity of use and form. The basic forms of comparative adjectives, as shown above, is an example of this. Conversely, teaching the finer points of the use of articles (a/an, the) inductively, for example, would most probably be problematic. The metalinguistic tools that the learners will need to accomplish the task is also a factor.
However, the learner-centred nature of inductive teaching is often seen as advantageous as the learner is more active in the learning process rather than being a passive recipient. This increased engagement may help the learner to develop deeper understanding and help fix the language being learned. This could also promote the strategy of ‘noticing’ in the student and enhance learner autonomy and motivation.
On the other hand, inductive learning can be more time- and energy-consuming and more demanding of the teacher and the learner. It is also possible that during the process, the learner may arrive at an incorrect inference or produce an incorrect or incomplete rule. Also, an inductive approach may frustrate learners whose personal learning style and/or past learning experience is more in line with being taught via a more teacher-centred and deductive approach.
While it might be appropriate at times to articulate a rule and then proceed to instances, most of the evidence in communicative second language teaching points to the superiority of an inductive approach to rules and generalizations. Nevertheless, while there are pros and cons to both approaches and while a combination of both inductive and deductive grammar teaching and learning is probably inevitable, an inductive approach does seem to be broadly accepted as being more efficient in the long run, at least for some learners.

References
[1] Zhang, Y. (2021). Comparative analysis of English college entrance examination papers from the perspective of core literacy and enlightenment of high school English teaching (Master's thesis, Qufu Normal University).
[2] Wang, Q. (2020). The Importance of Sentence Analysis in Filling in the Blanks in Senior English Grammar. English for Middle School Students (32), 159.
[3] Chen, S. (2014). Investigation and analysis of English grammar teaching and acquisition sequence in senior high school (Master's thesis, Shandong Normal University).
[4] Wang, Q. (2006). English Teaching Method Course. Second Edition. Higher Education Press.
[5] Liu, R.R. (2021). A comparative study of deductive and inductive methods in high school English grammar teaching.
[6] Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating Grammar in Adult TESOL Classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29, 456-482.
[7] Zhang, Z.B. (1983). A New English Grammar Course Book. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[8] Zhang, M. (2022). Research on the application of 5E teaching mode in English grammar teaching in high school (Master's thesis, Sichuan Foreign Studies University).
[9] Mei, L.M. (2021). A Brief Talk on Commonly Used Teaching Methods in Preparatory English Grammar..(eds.) South China Education Informatization Research Experience Exchange Conference 2021 Paper Compilation (13) (pp.365-369)
[10] Han, Q.Y. (2016). Comparative analysis of the role of inductive and deductive methods in English grammar teaching in high school .

1^ 2.Barron, R. F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In Research

2^ .H. L. Herber, & P. L. Sanders (Eds.), Syracuse. NY: Syracuse University, Reading and Language Arts Center.
3.Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitis, & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic Organizers. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.

3

^{9.Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.}