Economic Geography
Download 3.2 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Economic and social geography
Linda McDowell
Feminist economic geographies 37 that mean that women’s work – and so feminist arguments about its construc- tion (for example the association of gendered traits with particular kinds of work and the under-enumeration of ‘women’s work’ – began to loom larger on the landscape of economic geography. In the advanced industrial economies, tech- nological change, new international divisions of labour, capital mobility and new state policies were connected with the transformation of the labour markets in these economies. Women began to be constructed and officially recognised as waged workers as well as domestic labourers in state discourses (of course women’s waged work has been a key part of the economy across the centuries) and their efforts were seen as crucial to economic growth and efficiency (McDowell 2005a). From the mid twentieth century onwards, the rhetoric of women’s ‘dual roles’ proved an acceptable way of constructing women as part-time workers, able to combine their primary role as housewives and mothers – a domestic ideology with a long tradition in Britain but which took an extreme form after the end of the Second World War, written into the postwar settlement as women’s duty (Lewis 1991) – with earning a wage. Both the economy and the family seemed to prosper on this division in the postwar era as consumer industries expanded and individual families began to live in more comfortable ways, in part supported by women’s ability to earn a second wage in part-time jobs. This division of labour, however, began to flounder as deindustrialisation ripped apart the postwar compact, the families largely dependent on the wages of the male breadwinner and as new forms of service work began to expand. Here, the male-dominated trade union movement was slow to see that its complacent acceptance of lower wages for women and the development of female ghettoes in service sector employment – in the semi-professions for example of nursing, primary school teaching and social work as well as in the expanding lower echelons of service sector work – child care, retail, leisure and so on – meant that these sectors were able to be constructed as ‘women’s work’ and so rejected as potential jobs by unemployed men who had previously worked in more masculinised forms of heavy labour. In addition these female ghettoes included mainly low paid jobs. As a result, although more and more women entered the labour market, often in casualised or part-time jobs, the overall incomes of the poorest families dependent on wage labour began to fall. Toynbee (2003) and Ehrenreich’s (2001) recent exposes of the most exploitative end of these female- dominated servicing jobs in the UK and USA respectively provide shocking evidence of how the feminisation of the economy is related to growing income inequality. Meanwhile, other women – the better educated and more affluent who have benefited from the rising rates of educational participation – have begun to enter high status work in the service sector in growing numbers, moving into the professions, into law, medicine, banking, and the universities as well as into new sectors in the information economy and the cultural industries. The expansion of women’s waged labour thus provided an impetus to its analysis by economic geographers, albeit not necessarily drawing on feminist explanations. As a consequence, economic geographers interested in the transformation of their national economies, began to address new questions about regional change, 38 Linda McDowell organisational cultures, occupational segregation and the future shape of and spatial differentiation within service-dominated economies. And in this work, the very fact that many more workers were women, that women often worked part- time to allow for their continued responsibilities for their families, that they might not want to or be able to travel long distances to work raised new ques- tions that had seemed irrelevant in earlier studies. Thus, for example, in a fasci- nating case-study of the connections between recruitment policies and locational strategies, Kristen Nelson (1987) showed how high tech firms in the Bay Area in California explicitly searched for and changed location in order to attract a certain fraction of the female labour force; reliable but unambitious middle class and middle aged women for clerical positions. Susan Hanson and Gerry Pratt (1995) in their influential study of the labour market in Gloucester Mass looked at the connections between occupational segregation, travel to work patterns and household labours, Milkman (1987) showed how local labour market conditions especially the demand for labour influenced the ways in which firms in postwar America came to different decisions about the differential pay rates between men and women. In the UK, Doreen Massey (1984) and McDowell and Massey (1984) looked at regional divisions of labour and the connections with women’s domestic responsibilities. Massey (1995) then developed these ideas in an explo- ration of the connections between gendered roles and responsibilities in the emerging employment practices of the hi-tech industries then expanding around the university town of Cambridge and I looked at new gender divisions of labour in the City of London as deregulation after 1988 led to high demand for labour (McDowell 1997). In all this work, what distinguished it from other studies of regional development and labour market changes was explicit attention to the causes and consequences of the gender division of labour in the workplace and in the home. Feminist economic geographers built new ways of understanding gender divisions of labour exploring why women undertake the majority of domestic labour and caring for dependents, why men and women do different jobs in the labour market, under different conditions and for different rewards, but also began to ask how assump- tions about the characteristics of femininity and masculinity are themselves writ- ten into job descriptions, embedded within the cultural practices of capitalist organisations and reflected in different rates of financial remuneration. Download 3.2 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling