Эволюцияси, трансформацияси ва лексикографик

CONCLUSION
1. The rapid assimilation of modern assimilations into the language can be understood as a way of easy acceptance of neonominations of today’s world innovations into the lexis. The increase in borrowings is characterized by the influence of the quantity and quality of the lexis of the recipient language. Importantly, it is determined by the influence factor on the actual lexis.
2. The genetic sources of the lexical layer of the Uzbek language were statistically analyzed according to the total number of lexemes in the explanatory dictionary. In this case, the native words have a sufficient amount in terms of share, and the ratio of the words of the native layer to it is kept at a standard level. Among the borrowings, Persian and Arabic words occupy a significant place due to their activity in the actual lexis.
3. The period of independence was characterized by the fact that the mediating role of the Russian language became passive in the process of word borrowing, and the tendency to directly borrow words from European languages became active. In such appropriations, the proportion of English units acting as a metalanguage for international communication and computer terms has grown significantly.
4. New words in the language have their own stage before becoming a dictionary: protologism – a newly invented/discovered word; prelogism – a word appearing in the press, website, books, at the time of publication; a neologism is a word that has spread to the masses and formed in their minds as a general concept. After the final stage, they stabilize as a vocabulary word and the color of novelty disappears.
5. The mediating role of the Russian language in word borrowing remains stable in some areas. Moving away from the indirect process as much as possible, to the direct reception of source language words, is seen as an adequate way towards the benefit of the language.
6. The contribution of borrowed term neologisms to the lexis is significant, and several lexical-semantic groups have emerged. Formation of emerging neologisms on the basis of reserve words of one’s own layer, relying on the experience of naming models of world culture in necessary places also plays an important role.
7. Semantic transformation of borrowings in the lexis differs in the comparison of explanatory dictionary units created before independence and after independence. Such changes in appropriations are mainly related to metaphors.
8. Transformational gradation of new era appropriations is manifested in the form of lexemes used in the basic meaning, the basic meaning partially changed, disconnected from the basic meaning.
9. Reflecting new borrowings in general explanatory or spelling dictionaries is also characterized by the fact that regular users of the Internet and social networks significantly lag behind the rate of borrowing of words. The work of publishing a series of adopted neologisms dictionary as a base source for them is also of special importance. Also, the creation of an explanatory dictionary of the borrowings of the period of independence is also relevant for today.
10. In the synergetic process, the stability of the lexementation of new words in the vocabulary reserve strengthens the uniting of foreign language units in the association. As a result, an associative system of borrowings is formed in the recipient language. The norm of their formation is unique, quality and quantity signs differ in terms of periodicity.
11. Some problematic issues related to the lexicographic aspect of linguistically stabilized modern borrowings are highlighted. Among them are the reflection of stabilized independence-era borrowings in educational and general explanatory dictionaries, and the lexicographical description of those existing in dictionaries according to the expansion or narrowing of the meaning.
12. With the increase of native words in the vocabulary of the language, certain changes occur in its national nature. These changes are more related to the lexical, phonetic and stylistic levels, and in general have an impact on the whole language system. Moreover, as they assimilate into the language, the language, in turn, is characterized by its influence on the culture of that nation.